Federally mandated health planning is one of the most significant responses to the cost crisis of American medicine. Portrayed as an objective and rational mechanism of determining the future, planning is a socially acceptable means of exerting third-party control over a sector of the economy long able to escape meaningful controls on its growth and development. However, far from being the neutral science which it is heralded to be, the planning process serves the interests that are able to control its use.
Health planning agencies must be studied in the context of the current emphasis on cost containment and reorganization of health services. Supported and enfranchised largely by major third-party payors, planning smooths the implementation of changes in the health sector. Despite its progressive potential, planning serves the interests of these third-party payors by masking their attempts to control the future development of the health system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
The National Health Planning and Resource Development Act. PL93-641, 1974.
2.
SalmonJ.Corporate Attempts to Reorganize the American Health Sector. Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, 1978.
3.
Committee on the Cost of Medical Care. Medical Care For The American People—The Final Report of the Committee on the Cost of Medical Care, Volume 28. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1932.
4.
RoemerM. I.Bed supply and hospital utilization. Hospitals35(21): 36–42, 1961.
5.
PivenF. F.Whom does the advocate planner serve?, pp. 47–52. In The Politics of Turmoil, edited by PivenF.ClowardR., Random House, New York, 1975.
6.
KrauseE.Health planning as a managerial ideology. Int. J. Health Serv. 3(3): 445–463, 1973.
7.
KlarmanH. E.Health planning: Progress, prospects, and issues. Milbank Mem. Fund Q. 56(1): 78–112, 1978.
8.
VladeckB. C.Interest-group representation and the HSAs: Health planning and political theory. Am. J. Public Health67(1): 23–29, 1977.
9.
LanderL.HSAs: If at first you don't succeed…. Health/PAC Bulletin70: 1–15, 1976.
10.
DrorY.The planning process: A facet design, pp. 326–333. In A Reader in Planning Theory, edited by FaludiA., Pergamon Press, New York, 1973.
11.
AppelbaumR. P.Planning as technique: Some consequences of the rational-comprehensive model. In The Structural Crises of the 1970's and Beyond: The Need For a New Planning Theory. Proceedings of the Conference on Planning Theory, edited by GoldsteinH.RosenbergS., Division of Environmental and Urban Systems, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Va., 1978.
12.
EdwardsR. C.ReichM.WeiskopfT. E.The Capitalist System: A Radical Analysis of American Society. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1972.
13.
NavarroV.Medicine Under Capitalism. Prodist, New York, 1976.
14.
CrawfordR.You are dangerous to your health: The ideology and politics of victim blaming. Int. J. Health Serv. 7(4): 663–680, 1977.
15.
BerlinerH.Ideology in medicine. HMO—A Network for Marxist Studies in Health, No. 1, 1976.
16.
BerlinerH.SalmonJ.An historical critique of health and disease. HMO—A Network for Marxist Studies in Health, No. 4, 1978.
17.
KotelchuckD., editor. Prognosis Negative, pp. 163–201. Vintage Books, New York, 1976.
18.
EhrenreichB.EhrenreichJ.Hospital workers: Class conflict in the making. Int. J. Health Serv. 5(1): 43–51, 1975.
19.
KelmanS.The social nature of the definition problem in health. Int. J. Health Serv. 5(4): 625–642, 1975.
20.
RodbergL.StevensonG.The health care industry in advanced capitalism. Review of Radical Political Economics9(1): 104–115, 1977.
21.
Consumer Commission on the Accreditation of Health Services, Inc. Medical technology and the health care consumer. Consumer Health Perspectives5 (5, 6, 8), 1978.
22.
National Chamber Foundation. A National Health Care Strategy: How Business Can Improve Health Planning and Regulation. Washington, D.C., 1979.
23.
Califano announces HEW's new initiative: Productivity standards. Health Planning and Manpower Report7(23): 3–4, 1978.
24.
Nassau-Suffolk Health Systems Plan. Nassau-Suffolk HSA, Inc., Melville, N.Y., 1979.
25.
BrownD. R.Community health planning or who will control the health care system. Am. J. Public Health62(10): 1336–1338, 1972.
26.
RosenG.A History of Public Health. MD Publications, New York, 1958.
27.
BerlinerH.A larger perspective on the Flexner Report. Int. J. Health Serv. 5(4): 573–592, 1975.
28.
ShonickW.Elements of Planning for Area-Wide Personal Health Services. C. V. Mosby Co., St. Louis, 1976.
29.
KlarmanH. E.Planning for facilities. In Regionalization and Health Policy, edited by GinzbergE., Health Resources Administration, Washington, D.C., 1977.
30.
KotelchuckR.The depression and the AMA. Health/PAC Bulletin69: 13–18, 1976.
31.
LawS.Blue Cross: What Went Wrong?Yale University Press, New Haven, 1976.
32.
LeeR. J.JonesL. W.The fundamentals of good medical care. Publications of the Committee on Costs of Medical Care, No. 22. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1933.
33.
ThompsonP.Voluntary regional planning. In Regionalization and Health Policy, edited by GinzbergE., Health Resources Administration, Washington, D.C., 1977.
34.
GottliebS. R.A brief history of health planning in the U.S. In Regulating Health Facilities Construction, edited by HavighurstC., American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C., 1974.
35.
NavarroV.Political power, the state, and their implications in medicine. Review of Radical Political Economics9(1): 61–80, 1977.
36.
BradleyJ.A Strategy to Improve the Effectiveness of Consumer Participation in Health Planning: An Educational Approach. Submitted to the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Urban and Regional Planning, University of Pittsburgh, 1978.
37.
Editors. Economic crisis: Midwife to change. Health/PAC69, 1976.
38.
MarmorT.MoroneJ.HSAs and the Representation of Consumer Interests: Conceptual Issues and Litigation Problems. Health Law Project Library Bulletin4(4): 117–128, 1979.
39.
AlfordR. R.Health Care Politics: Ideological and Interest Group Barriers to Reform. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1975.
40.
SalmonJ.Monopoly capital and the reorganization of the health sector. Review of Radical Political Economics9(1): 125–133, 1977.
41.
BerlinerH.Emerging ideologies in medicine. Review of Radical Political Economics9(1): 117–124, 1977.
42.
CHAN: Consumer Health Action Network. Consumer Coalition for Health, Washington, D.C.
43.
TannenL.LiebmanJ.Population-based planning as a tool for health plan development. American Journal of Health Planning3(3): 48–55, 1978.
44.
NormileF. R.ZielH. A.Jr.Too many beds. Hospitals44(14): 61–64, 1970.
45.
DowlingW. L.A procedure for rational planning, pp. 26–38. In Cost Control in Hospitals, edited by GriffithJ. R.HancockW. M.MunsonS. C., Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor, 1975.
46.
RoemerM.Hospital utilization and the health care system. Am. J. Public Health66(10): 953–955, 1976.
47.
LewisC. E.Variance in the incidence of surgery. N. Engl. J. Med.282(3): 135–144, 1970.
