Carolyn Miller's oft-cited “Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing,” published in 1979, tries to give technical communication faculty more cultural capital in English departments controlled by literature professors. Miller replaces a positivistic emphasis in technical communication pedagogy with rhetoric. She shows how technical knowledge is produced by individual activity and social affirmation and not by objective descriptions of sensory impressions. Her “Rationale” is an attempt to change institutional and discursive structures by persuading literature professors that technical communication can have as much distinction in the academy as literature.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SavageG. J., Introduction: Toward Professional Status in Technical Communication, in Power and Legitimacy in Technical Communication, Vol. 1, Kynell-HuntT. and SavageG. J. (eds.), Baywood Publishing Company, Amityville, New York, pp. 1–12, 2003.
2.
TebeauxE., The Emergence of a Tradition: Technical Writing in the English Renaissance, 1475–1640, Baywood Publishing Company, Amityville, New York, 1997.
3.
ConnorsR. J., The Rise of Technical Writing Instruction in America, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 12(4), pp. 329–351, 1982.
4.
HaggeJ., The First Technical Writer in English: A Challenge to the Hegemony of Chaucer, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 20(3), pp. 269–289, 1990.
5.
LongoB., Plain Talk from Rudolf Flesch: Making a Science of Writing, in Power and Legitimacy in Technical Communication, Vol. 1, Kynell-HuntT. and SavageG. J. (eds.), Baywood Publishing Company, Amityville, New York, pp. 39–52, 2003.
6.
Kynell-HuntT., Technical Communication from 1850–1950: Where Have We Been? in Power and Legitimacy in Technical Communication, Vol. 2, Kynell-HuntT. and SavageG. J. (eds.), Baywood Publishing Company, Amityville, New York, pp. 11–19, 2004.
7.
TebeauxE., Returning to Our Roots: Gaining Power through the Culture of Engagement, in Power and Legitimacy in Technical Communication, Vol. 2, Kynell-HuntT. and SavageG. J. (eds.), Baywood Publishing Company, Amityville, New York, pp. 21–50, 2004.
8.
MillerC., A Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing, College English, 40(6), pp. 610–617, 1979.
9.
SmithE. O., Points of Reference Contributing to the Professionalization of Technical Communication, in Power and Legitimacy in Technical Communication, Vol. 2, Kynell-HuntT. and SavageG. J. (eds.), Baywood Publishing Company, Amityville, New York, pp. 51–72, 2004.
10.
GuilloryJ., Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1993.
11.
BourdieuP., Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1984.
12.
FaberB., Professional Identities: What Is Professional about Professional Communication?Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 16(3), pp. 306–337, 2002.
13.
Aristotle, On Rhetoric, trans. KennedyGeorge A.. Oxford University Press, New York, 1991.
14.
NelsonC., Review: Between Anonymity and Celebrity: The Zero Degrees of Professional Identity, College English, 64(6), pp. 710–719, 2002.
15.
WrightR., Nonzero: The Logic of Human Destiny, Vintage Books, New York, 2000.
16.
SingerP., A Darwinian Left: Politics, Evolution, and CooperationYale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, 1999.
17.
MoorePatrick, Questioning the Motives of Technical Communication and Rhetoric: Steven Katz's ‘Ethic of Expediency’, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 54(1–2), 2004.
18.
MoorePatrick, Rethinking the Idea of Profit in Professional Communication and Cultural Capitalism, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 18(2), 2004.
19.
MoorePatrick, Evolving Paradigms of Communication Analysis: A Defense of Teaching Software Programs in Technical Communication Classes, TEXT Technology, Winter 2001.
20.
MoorePatrick, When Persuasion Fails: Coping with Power Struggles, Technical Communication, 46(3), 1999.
21.
MoorePatrick, Myths about Instrumental Discourse: A Response to Robert R. Johnson, Technical Communication Quarterly, 8(2), 1999.
22.
MoorePatrick, Rhetorical vs. Instrumental Approaches to Teaching Technical Communication, Technical Communication, 44(2), 1997.
