Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The National Educational Technology Standards for Students promote constructivist technology use for K-12 students in U.S. schools. In this study, researchers reported on 716 cases in which teachers described technology-based activities they conducted with their students. Narrative analysis was used to examine case transcripts relative to the NETS*S, and the constructivist principles that support them. Findings suggest teachers' instructional technology use has shifted from the drill-and-practice and word-processing usage that was so pervasive in the 1980s and 1990s, to more constructive hands-on tool-based uses. However, teachers missed opportunities to engage their students in higher-order thinking when they limited problem-solving potential and over-structured student design activities.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

I. E.

(1988). Personality, psychological assessment, and psychobiography. In McAdams

& Ochberg

(Eds.), Psychobiography and life narratives (pp. 265–294). London: Duke University Press.

Barron

A. E.

Kemker

Harmes

, & Kalydjian

(2003). Large-scale research study on technology in K-12 schools: Technology integration as it relates to the national technology standards. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(4), 489–507.

Bawden

(2001). Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts. Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 218–259.

Becker

H. J.

(1991). How computers are used in United States schools: Basic data from the 1989 I.E.A. Computers in Education Survey. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7(4), 385–406.

Becker

H. J.

Ravitz

J. L.

, & Wong

(1999). Teacher and teacher-directed student use of computer software. Retrieved July 24, 2005 from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/computeruse/html/startpage.htm

Bruner

(1986). Play, thought and language: Prospects. Quarterly Review of Education, 16(1), 77–83.

Bruner

(1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Clandinin

J. D.

, & Connelly

M. F.

(2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Claris Corporation. (1994). ClarisWorks (Version 2.1) [Computer Software]. Santa Clara, CA: Claris Corp.

10.

Cuban

(2001). Oversold and underused. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

11.

David

(1991). Restructuring and technology: Partners in change. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(1), 37–40, 78–82.

12.

Duffy

T. M.

, & Cunningham

D. J.

(1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In Jonassen

(Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 170–198). New York: Macmillan.

13.

Fidel

Davies

R. K.

Douglass

M. H.

Holder

Hopkins

C. J.

Kushner

E. J.

Miyagishima

, & Toney

D. D.

(1999). A visit to the information mall: Web searching behavior of high school students. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 50, 24–27.

14.

Foster

B. G.

(1995). Helping children cope in the information age. Educational Horizons, 73(4), 174–180.

15.

Inspiration Software, Inc. (1997). Inspiration [Computer Software]. Portland, OR: Inspiration, Inc.

16.

Inspiration Software, Inc. (2000). Kidspiration [Computer Software]. Portland, OR: Inspiration, Inc.

17.

International Society for Technology in Education. (2000). National educational technology standards for students: Connecting curriculum and technology. Eugene, OR: ISTE.

18.

isee systems. (2005). Stella (Version 8.1) [Computer Software]. Lebanon, NH: isee systems, inc.

19.

Jonassen

D. H.

(1995). Supporting communities of learners with technology: A vision for integrating technology with learning in schools. Educational Technology, 35(4), 60–63.

20.

Jonassen

D. H.

(1996). Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.

21.

Jonassen

D. H.

(1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–95.

22.

Jonassen

D. H.

Campbell

J. P.

, & Davidson

M. E.

(1994). Learning with media: Restructuring the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 31–39.

23.

Jonassen

Howland

Moore

, & Marra

(2003). Learning to solve problems with technology (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

24.

Jonassen

D. H.

Peck

K. L.

, & Wilson

B. G.

(1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

25.

Kafai

, & Resnick

(1996). Constructionism in practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

26.

Kalton

, & Schuman

(1982). The effect of the question on survey responses: A review. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 145(1), 42–57.

27.

Lehrer

(1993). Authors of knowledge: Patterns of hypermedia design. In Lajoie

& Derry

(Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 197–227). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

28.

Maddux

C. D.

Johnson

D. L.

, & Willis

J. W.

(1997). Educational computing (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

29.

MapleSoft. (2004). Maple [Computer Software]. Ontario, Canada: MapleSoft.

30.

Microsoft Corporation. (2005). PowerPoint [Computer Software]. Redmond, WA: Microsoft.

31.

Minnesota Educational Computing Corporation. (2001). Oregon Trail [Computer Software]. Minneapolis, MN: MECC.

32.

National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (2000). Teacher use of computers and the Internet in public schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

33.

National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (2003). Internet access in U.S. public schools 1994–2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

34.

National Council for Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

35.

National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

36.

National School Board Foundation. (2002). Are we there yet? Research and guidelines on schools' use of the Internet. Retrieved June 23, 2003 from: http://www.nsbf.org/thereyet/fulltext.htm

37.

Niederhauser

D. S.

(1996). Using computers in an information age classroom: What teachers need to know. National Association for Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 80(582), 72–80.

38.

Niederhauser

D. S.

, & Stoddart

(2001). Teachers' instructional perspectives and use of educational software. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(1), 15–31.

39.

November

(2001). Empowering students with technology. Arlington Heights, IL: Skylights.

40.

Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). (1988). Power on! New tools for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

41.

Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

42.

Oppenheimer

(2003). The flickering mind: The false promise of technology in the classroom and how learning can be saved. New York: Random House.

43.

Papert

(1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.

44.

Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2003). The road to 21st century learning: A policymaker's guide to 21st century skills. Retrieved May 11, 2005, from: http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=30&Itemid=32

45.

Peck

K. L.

, & Dorricott

(1994). Why use technology? Educational Leadership, 51(7), 11–15.

46.

Polanyi

(1985). Telling the American story: A structural and cultural analysis of conversational storytelling. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishers Corporation.

47.

President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology. (1997). Report to the President on the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States. Retrieved March 12, 2003, from: http://www.ostp.gov/PCAST/k=12ed.html

48.

Raudenbush

S. W.

(2004). Learning from attempts to improve schooling: The contribution of methodological diversity. Retrieved July 23, 2005, from: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Multiple_Methods_Raudenbush_Paper.pdf

49.

Renaissance Learning. (2005). Accelerated Reader [Computer Software]. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Renaissance Learning.

50.

Resta

(1990, April). Computer ethics and students: The educational challenge. Paper presented at the National Institute of Justice Professional Conference on Information Technology Ethics, Washington, DC.

51.

Riel

, & Becker

H. J.

(2000). The beliefs, practices and computer usage of teacher-leaders. Retrieved July 23, 2005, from: http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/aera/startpage.html

52.

Ritta

, & Stewart

(1996). Applying technology in the classroom: Innovation strategies for teaching anatomy and physiology. Tech Trends, 41, 1.

53.

RiverDeep Software. (1991). Kid Pix[Computer Software]. El Cajon, CA: Roger Wagner.

54.

Roger Wagner Publishing Company. (1997). HyperStudio [Computer Software]. El Cajon, CA: Roger Wagner.

55.

Salomon

, & Perkins

(1996). Learning in wonderland: What do computers offer education? In Kerr

(Ed.), Technology and the future of schooling (pp. 111–130). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

56.

Sandholtz

H. J.

Ringstaff

, & Dwyer

D. C.

(1992). Teaching in high-tech environments: Classroom management revisited. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8(4), 479–505.

57.

Scardamalia

, & Bereiter

(1996). Engaging students in a knowledge society. Educational Leadership, 54(3), 6–10.

58.

Schacter

Chung

, & Dorr

(1998). Children's Internet searching on complex problems: Performance and process analyses. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 840–849.

59.

Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills. (1991). What work requires of schools: A SCANS report for America 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

60.

Sharp

(1996). Computer education for teachers. Madison, WI: Brown and Benchmark.

61.

Sheingold

(1991). Restructuring for learning with technology: The potential for synergy. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(1), 17–27.

62.

Sheingold

, & Hadley

(1990). Accomplished teachers: Integrating computers into classroom practice (Tech. Rep.). New York: Bank Street College of Education, Center for Technology in Education.

63.

Siegle

, & Foster

(2001). Laptop computers and multimedia and presentation software: Their effects on student achievement in anatomy and physiology. Journal of Research in Education, 34(1), 29–37.

64.

Spivey

N. N.

(1995). Written discourse: A constructivist perspective. In Steffe

& Gale

(Eds.), Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

65.

Strike

, & Posner

(1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In Dunkle

& Hamilton

(Eds.), Philosophy f science, cognitive psychology and educational theory and practice. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

66.

Thorsen

(1998). Teaching presentation software: Thinking in 3-D. Boise, ID: Boise State Education Technology Program.

67.

Tobin

(Ed.). (1993). The practice of constructivism in science education. Washington, DC: AAAS Press.

68.

Tyack

, & Cuban

(1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

69.

U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Federal funding for educational technology and how it is used in the classroom: A summary of findings from the integrated studies of educational technology. Washington, DC: Policy and Program Studies Service.

70.

von Glasersfeld

(1979). Radical constructivism and Piaget's concept of knowledge. In Murray

(Ed.), The impact of the Piagetian theory on education, philosophy and psychology (pp. 109–122). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

71.

von Glasersfeld

(Ed). (1991). Radical constructivism in mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

72.

Vernier Software and Technology. (2004). Logger pro (Version 3) [Computer Software]. Beaverton, OR: Vernier Software & Technology.

73.

Vygotsky

L. S.

(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher order psychological processes. Cole

John-Steiner

Cribner

S. J.

, & Souberman

(Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

74.

Willis

J. W.

Stevens

E. C.

, & Matthew

K. I.

(1996). Technology, reading and language arts. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Addressing the Nets for Students Through Constructivist Technology Use in K–12 Classrooms

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References