The Role of Self-Regulated Learning in Fostering Students' Conceptual Understanding of Complex Systems with Hypermedia

Abstract

This study examines the role of self-regulated learning (SRL) in facilitating students' shifts to more sophisticated mental models of the circulatory system as indicated by both performance and process data. We began with Winne and colleagues' information processing model of SRL (Winne, 2001; Winne & Hadwin, 1998) and used it to examine how students regulated their own learning when using a hypermedia environment to learn about the circulatory system. Undergraduate students (N = 24) were trained to use a hypermedia environment to learn about the circulatory system. Pretest, posttest, and verbal protocol data were collected to measure the shifts in conceptual understanding (from pretest to posttest) and the SRL variables associated with shifts in conceptual understanding. We used a median split to divide the sample into two groups of learners—high-jumpers and low-jumpers (i.e., students who either showed large gains in conceptual understanding or showed relatively little or no gain in their conceptual understanding). Findings revealed that the high-jumpers shifted an average of 4.5 mental models, while the low-jumpers had an average shift of less than one mental model from pretest to posttest. The verbal protocol data were coded for various self-regulating variables to examine which SRL variables differentiated the low-jumpers from the high-jumpers. High-jumpers were much better at regulating their learning during the knowledge construction activity. In general, they used effective strategies, planned their learning by creating sub-goals and activating prior knowledge, monitored their emerging understanding, and planned their time and effort. In contrast, low-jumpers used equal amounts of effective and ineffective strategies, planned their learning by using sub-goals and recycling goals in working memory, handled task difficulties and demands by engaging mainly in help-seeking behavior, and did not spend much time monitoring their learning. Our results provide a valuable initial characterization of the role of SRL in accounting for differences in conceptual knowledge gains when students use hypermedia environments to learn about complex science topics. In addition, we discuss the general instructional implications of our findings and how they can be used to inform the design of hypermedia environments to teach students about complex systems.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Azevedo

(2002). Beyond intelligent tutoring systems: Computers as metacognitive tools to enhance learning? Instructional Science, 30, 31–45.

Azevedo

Seibert

Guthrie

J. T.

Cromley

J. G.

Wang

Tron

(2002, April). How do students regulate their learning of complex systems with hypermedia? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

Azevedo

Verona

M. E.

Cromley

J. G.

(2001). Fostering students' collaborative problem solving with RiverWeb. In Moore

J. D.

Redfield

C. L.

Johnson

W. L.

(Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education: AI-ED in the wired and wireless future (pp. 166–175). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

Boekaerts

Pintrich

Zeidner

(2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Chi

M. T. H.

(2000). Self-explaining: The dual processes of generating inference and repairing mental models. In Glaser

(Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology: Educational design and cognitive science (Vol. 5, pp. 161–238). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Chi

M. T. H.

de Leeuw

Chiu

M. H.

LaVancher

(1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477.

Chi

M. T. H.

Siler

Jeong

Yamauchi

Hausmann

(2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471–534.

Dillon

Gabbard

(1998). Hypermedia as educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research, 68, 322–349.

Ericsson

K. A.

Simon

H. A.

(1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

10.

Hadwin

A. F.

Winne

P. H.

(2001). CoNoteS2: A software tool for promoting self-regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7, 313–334.

11.

Hmelo

C. E.

Holton

D. L.

Kolodner

J. L.

(2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 247–298.

12.

Jacobson

Archodidou

(2000). The design of hypermedia tools for learning: Fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 145–199.

13.

Kozma

Chin

Russell

Marx

(2000). The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 105–144.

14.

Land

(2000). Cognitive requirements for learning with open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48(3), 61–78.

15.

MacGregor

S. K.

(1999). Hypermedia navigation profiles: Cognitive characteristics and information processing strategies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 189–206.

16.

Mayer

R. E.

(2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Mayer

R. E.

Chandler

(2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia passages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 390–397.

18.

Moreno

Mayer

R. E.

(2002). Learning science in virtual reality multimedia environments: Role of methods and media. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 598–610.

19.

Narayanan

N. H.

Hegarty

(1998). On designing comprehensible interactive hypermedia manuals. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 48, 267–301.

20.

Oliver

Hannafin

(2001). Developing and refining mental models in open-ended learning environments: A case study. ETRD, 94(4), 5–32.

21.

Pintrich

P. R.

(2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In Boekaerts

Pintrich

Zeidner

(Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

22.

Pressley

Afflerbach

(1995). Verbal reports of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

23.

Shapiro

(1999). The relationship between prior knowledge and interactive overviews during hypermedia-aided learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 143–167.

24.

Shapiro

(2000). The effect of interactive overviews on the development of conceptual structure in novices learning from hypermedia. Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9, 57–78.

25.

Vosniadou

Brewer

(1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535–586.

26.

White

B. A.

Frederiksen

J. R.

(1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science more accessible to all students. Cognition & Instruction, 16(1), 3–118.

27.

Winne

P. H.

(2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In Zimmerman

Schunk

(Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153–189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

28.

Winne

P. H.

Hadwin

A. F.

(1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In Hacker

D. J.

Dunlosky

Graesser

(Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

29.

Winne

P. H.

Jamieson-Noel

Muis

(2002). Methodological issues and advances in researching tactics, strategies, and self-regulated learning. In Pintrich

Maehr

(Eds.), New direction in measures and methods (pp. 121–156). Amsterdam: JAI.

30.

Winne

P. H.

Perry

N. E.

(2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In Boekaerts

Pintrich

Zeidner

(Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

31.

Winne

P. H.

Stockley

D. B.

(1998). Computing technologies as sites for developing self-regulated learning. In Schunk

Zimmerman

(Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 106–136). New York: Guilford Press.

32.

Zimmerman

(2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In Boekaerts

Pintrich

Zeidner

(Eds.), Handbook of selfregulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

33.

Zimmerman

(2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In Zimmerman

Schunk

(Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

34.

Zimmerman

Schunk

(2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.