Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The primary goal of the experiment was to examine whether emotional and intellectual responses to sculptures increase or decrease over time. A second purpose was to explore the effects on these ratings of generating or receiving accounts of what was happening in these scenes. Seventy-two subjects viewed four groups of figurative sculptures in a public gallery and rated them twice on nine 7-point scales. They generated interpretations for two sculptures and received interpretations for two others between the first and second ratings. Results showed that emotional responses predominated during the initial encounter, while intellectual activity was more significant in the second one. Generating interpretations reduced the tendency for emotional impact and perceived originality to diminish over time. A qualitative analysis suggested four kinds of written interpretations; objectifying, personalizing, universalizing, and metaphorizing.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berlyne

D. E.

(1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appelton-Century-Crofts.

Berlyne

D. E.

(1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics. Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere.

Bruner

J. S.

(1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Reivew, 31, 21–32.

Cupchik

G. C.

, & Berlyne

D. G.

(1979). The perception of collative properties in visual stimuli. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 20, 93–104.

Cupchik

G. C.

, & Gebotys

R. J.

(1988). The experience of time, pleasure, and interest during aesthetic episodes. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 6, 1–12.

Cupchik

G. C.

Shereck

, & Spiegel

(1994). The effects of textual information on artistic communication. Visual Arts Research, 20, 62–78.

Cupchik

G. C.

Spiegel

, & Shereck

(1996). Unity in the diversity of aesthetic response. Visual Arts Research, 22(1), 1–10.

Getzels

J. W.

, & Csikszentmihalyi

(1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: John Wiley.

Gombrich

E. H.

(1960). Art and illusion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

10.

Isen

(1987). Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior. In Berkowitz

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 20 (pp. 203–253). New York: Academic Press.

11.

Schmidt

S. J.

(1982). Foundations for the empirical science of literature ( de Beaugrande

, Trans.). Hamburg: Buske.

12.

Winston

A. S.

, & Cupchik

G. C.

(1992). The evaluation of high art and popular art by naive and experienced viewers. Visual Arts Research, 18, 1–14.

Generating and Receiving Contextualized Interpretations of Figurative Sculptures

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References