Abstract
Dramatic advances in psychopharmacology, the increased number of psychiatric rehospitalizations, and the advent of automated methods for processing information have all served to make more urgent psychiatry's need for a common language. In order to determine if psychiatry has a current common language, twenty-eight recognized experts from medical centers across the country were questioned regarding what categories, areas, and items of information they felt should be recorded in a mental status examination from one diagnostic interview. Results indicate that a basis for both a traditional and relevant common language in psychiatry does exist when viewed from the perspective of describing a patient's current mental status. Each psychiatrist must strive to overcome a tendency in the profession to develop a unique, elite and often incomprehensible vocabulary.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
