Social Austerity versus Structural Reform in European Health Systems: A Four-Country Comparison of Health Reforms

Abstract

Cost containment has captured the attention of health policymakers in most OECD countries, and deliberations about creating powerful financial incentives dominate health care politics. Some European health systems are now implementing hospital payment schemes that mirror the U.S. model of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) and are raising premiums and copayment levels in an effort to limit public expenditures. Though financial incentives may indeed help rein in health expenditures, focusing predominantly on financial incentives hinders due consideration of needed structural reforms that improve the continuity, quality, and appropriateness of health care service delivery. This article focuses on the structural specifics of two legally enacted health insurance systems (Germany and Austria) and two national health systems (Great Britain and Denmark) to discuss the influence of structural characteristics on cost-containment efforts. Structural reform strategies discussed include increasing reliance on general practitioners, improving coordination of community and hospital-based specialty care, addressing the stark divide between ambulatory and hospital-based care that exists in some European health systems, and improving continuity of care by better integrating medical and social care sectors. Also discussed is the relative focus on financial incentives versus structural deficits in recent European health care reform strategies.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

OECD. New Directions in Health Care Policy. OECD Health Policy Studies No. 7. Paris, 1995.

OECD. OECD Health Data 2000: Comparative Analysis of 29 Countries. Paris, 2000.

Kupor

, The effect of copayments and income on the utilization of medical care by subscribers to Japan's national health insurance system. Int. J. Health Serv. 25(2): 295–312, 1995.

Stoddart

G. L.

Barer

M. L.

, and Evans

User Charges, Snares, and Delusions: Another Look at the Literature. Center for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 1993.

Rice

The Economics of Health Reconsidered. Health Administration Press, Chicago, 1998.

Enthoven

A. C.

What can Europeans learn from Americans? In OECD: Health Care Systems in Transition—The Search for Efficiency. OECD Social Policy Studies No. 7, pp. 57–71. OECD, Paris, 1990.

Wendt

Krankenversicherang oder Gesundheitsversorgung? Gesundheitssysteme im Vergleich. Westdeutscher Verlag, Wiesbaden, 2003.

Alber

Die Gesundheitssysteme der OECD-Länder im Vergleich. In Staatstätigkeit: International und historisch vergleichende Analysen, ed. Schmidt

M. G.

, pp. 116–150. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1998.

Alber

, Die Steuerung des Gesundheitssystems in vergleichender Perspektive. Journal für Sozialforschung 29(3): 259–284, 1989.

10.

NOMESCO. Health Statistics in the Nordic Countries. Copenhagen, 2001.

11.

Office of Health Economics. Compendium of Health Statistics, Ed. 10. London, 1998.

12.

Bundesministerium für Gesundheit. Statistisches Taschenbuch Gesundheit. Bonn, 2002.

13.

Hauptverband der österreichischen Sozialversicherungsträger. Die österreichische Sozialversicherung in Zahlen. Vienna, 2003.

14.

Evans

R. G.

Supplier induced demand: Some empirical evidence and implications. In The Economics of Health and Medical Care, ed. Perlman

. Macmillan, London, 1974.

15.

Evans

R. G.

Marketing markets, regulating regulators: Who gains? Who loses? What hopes? What scope? In OECD: Health Care Reform: The Will to Change. OECD Health Policy Studies No. 8, pp. 95–114. OECD, Paris, 1996.

16.

OECD. The Reform of Health Care Systems: A Review of Seventeen OECD Countries. OECD Health Policy Studies No. 5. Paris, 1994.

17.

Hirschman

A. O.

Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Declines in Firms, Organizations, and States. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1970.

18.

Hirschman

A. O.

Rival Views of Market Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1992.

19.

Wendt

Health Services for Children in Denmark, Germany, Austria and Great Britain. MZES Working Paper 4. Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung, Mannheim, 1999.

20.

OECD. OECD Health Data 1998: Comparative Analysis of 29 Countries. Paris, 1998.

21.

BASYS. Gesundheitssysteme im internationalen Vergleich: Übersichten 1997. Augsburg, 1998.

22.

Sandier

Health service utilization and physician income trends. In OECD: Health Care Systems in Transition—The Search for Efficiency. OECD Social Policy Studies No. 7, pp. 41–56. OECD, Paris, 1990.

23.

Beske

, and Hallauer

J. F.

Das Gesundheitswesen in Deutschland: Struktur—Leistung—Weiterentwicklung, Ed. 3 Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag, Cologne, 2001.

24.

Central Archive for Empirical Social Research. Eurobarometer 44.3: Health Care Issues and Public Security, February—April 1996.

25.

Tálos

Vom “goldenen Zeitalter” zur Krise. In Österreich 1945–1995, Gesellschaft, Politik, Kultur, ed. Sieder

, pp. 537–551. Verlag für Gesellschaftskritik, Vienna, 1995.

26.

Badelt

, and Österle

Grundzüge der Sozialpolitik: Spezieller Teil—Sozialpolitik in Österreich. Manzsche, Vienna, 1998.

27.

Bundesministerium für Gesundheit. Das Gesundheitswesen in Österreich. Vienna, 1996.

28.

Schieber

G. J.

, and Poullier

J.-P.

Overview of international comparisons of health care expenditure. In OECD: Health Care Systems in Transition—The Search for Efficiency. OECD Social Policy Studies No. 7, pp. 9–15. OECD, Paris, 1990.

29.

Saltman

R. B.

, The context of health reform in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Germany, and the United States. Health Policy 41: 9–26, 1997.

30.

Saltman

R. B.

, Patient choice and patient empowerment in northern European health systems: A conceptual framework. Int. J. Health Serv. 24(2): 201–229, 1994.

31.

Statistisches Bundesamt. Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes. Metzler-Poeschel, Stuttgart, 1998.