Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In the Fall of 2004, 1,948 5th grade students from Phoenix, AZ enrolled in an evaluation of a school-based, substance use prevention intervention. To assess the consistency of Mexican and Mexican-American students' self-reports of lifetime substance use, the present study analyzed data reported by 1,418 students who reported Mexican ancestry and completed 2 to 6 questionnaires administered over a 40-month period. By wave 6, which was completed in March 2008, lifetime alcohol, cigarette, marijuana, and inhalant use rates were 86.0%, 65.0%, 64.5%, and 62.1%, respectively. Corresponding rescission rates were 24.0%, 9.6%, 5.8%, and 9.2%. Reporting patterns with one “Yes–No” sequence accounted for more than 88% of the inconsistent self-reports. This finding suggests that the majority of Mexican/Mexican-American preadolescents participating in a substance use prevention intervention provided logically consistent self-reports of lifetime substance use.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bailey

S. L.

Flewelling

R. L.

Rachal

J. V.

(1992). The characterization of inconsistencies in self-reports of alcohol and marijuana use in a longitudinal study of adolescents. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 53, 636–647.

Collins

Graham

J. W.

Hansen

W. B.

Johnson

C. A.

(1985). Agreement between retrospective accounts of substance use and earlier reported substance use. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 301–309.

Cornfield

(1978). Randomization by group: A formal analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 108, 100–102.

Ellickson

P. L.

Bell

R. M.

(1990). Drug prevention in junior high: A multi-site longitudinal test. Science, 247, 1299–1305.

Farrell

A. D.

Danish

S. J.

Howard

C. W.

(1991). Evaluation of data screening methods in surveys of adolescents' drug use. Pychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 295–298.

Fendrich

Kim

J. Y. S.

(2001). Multiwave analysis of retest artifact in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth drug use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 62, 239–253.

Fendrich

Mackesy-Amiti

M. E.

(2000). Decreased drug reporting in a cross-sectional student drug use survey. Journal of Substance Abuse, 11, 1–12.

Fendrich

Rosenbaum

D. P.

(2003). Recanting of substance use reports in a longitudinal prevention study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 70, 241–253.

Fendrich

Vaughn

C. M.

(1994). Diminished lifetime substance use over time: An inquiry into differential underreporting. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58, 96–123.

10.

Hansen

W. B.

Graham

J. W.

(1991). Preventing alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use among adolescents: Peer pressure resistance training versus establishing conservative norms. Preventive Medicine, 20, 414–430.

11.

Henry

K. L.

(2007). Who's skipping school: Characteristics of truants in 8th and 10th grade? Journal of School Health, 77, 29–35.

12.

Johnson

R. A.

Gerstein

G. A.

Rasinski

R. A.

(1998). Adjusting survey estimates for response bias: An application to trends in alcohol and marijuana use. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 354–377.

13.

Johnston

L. D.

O'Malley

P. M.

(1997). The recanting of earlier reported drug use by young adults. In Harrison

Hughes

(Eds.), The validity of self-reported drug use: Improving the accuracy of survey estimates (pp. 59–80). NIDA Research Monograph 167 (NIH Publication No. 97-4147). Rockville, MD: U.S. Government Printing Office.

14.

Johnston

L. D.

O'Malley

P. M.

Bachman

J. G.

Schlenberg

J. E.

(2006). Monitoring the future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2005. (NIH Publication No. 06-5882). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

15.

Mensch

B. S.

Kandel

D. B.

(1988). Underreporting of substance use in a national youth cohort: Individual and interviewer effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 100–124.

16.

Percy

McAlister

Higgins

McCrystal

Thornton

(2005). Response consistency in young adolescents' drug use self-reports: A recanting rate analysis. Addiction, 100, 189–196.

17.

Rodgers

J. L.

Billy

J. O. G.

Udry

J. R.

(1982). The rescission of behaviors: Inconsistent responses in adolescent sexuality data. Social Science Research, 11, 280–296.

18.

Siegel

D. M.

Aten

M. J.

Roghmann

K. J.

(1998). Self-reported honesty among middle and high school students responding to a sexual behavior questionnaire. Journal of Adolescent Health, 23, 20–28.

19.

Stanton

C. A.

Papandonatos

Lloyd-Richardson

E. E.

Niaura

(2007). Consistency of self-reported smoking over a 6-year interval from adolescence to young adulthood. Addiction, 102, 1831–1839.

20.

Stata Corporation. (2007). Stata statistical software: Release 10.0. College Station, TX: Author.

21.

Stein

L. A. R.

Colby

S. M.

O'Leary

T. A.

Monti

P. M.

Rohsenow

D. J.

Spirito

, (2002). Response distortion in adolescents who smoke: A pilot study. Journal of Drug Education, 32, 271–286.

22.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2007). Results from the 2006 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings (Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-32, DHHS Publication No. SMA 07-4293). Rockville, MD. [Available as a PDF at http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nsduh/]

A Six-Wave Study of the Consistency of Mexican/Mexican American Preadolescents' Lifetime Substance Use Reports

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References