Abstract
This article proposes that the conception in literary theory now known under the name of Empirical Science of Literature should take up the name: Constructivist Science of Literature. The reason for this is, that the use of the term “empirical” diminishes the chances of the school to become a paradigm, because 1) according to the ontological use of “empirical” the Empirical Science of Literature is not an empirical science; 2) the (epistemological) use of the term “empirical” by the Empirical Science of Literature is irreconcilable with its (ontological) use by the potential legitimatizing community; and 3) the significance of the Empirical Science of Literature does not spring from its empirism, but from its constructivism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
