To promote the academic success of and to retain adult students of color, the Academic Services Unit at the University of Detroit Mercy (UDM), an urban Catholic university, in Detroit Michigan, has designed and implemented the Professional Mentor Program Plus, funded by the State of Michigan's King-Chavez-Parks (KCP) higher education initiative, that fuses academic support programming, and mentoring, designed exclusively for adult students, into a proactive academic success and retention model. The program's rationale, history, and findings from the 2003–04 year-end evaluation are presented, followed by the program's future development plan.
AustinA. W. (1984). Minorities in American higher education: Recent trends, current prospects, and recommendations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
ChavezM. & Maestas-FloresM. (1991). Minority student retention: ENLACE. New Directions for Community Colleges, 74(2), 63–67.
4.
ClewellB. C. & FicklenM. S. (1987). Effective institutional practices for improving minority retention in higher education. Journal of College Admissions, Summer(116), 7–13.
5.
CohenN. H. (1995). Mentoring adult learners: A guide for educators and trainers. Mallbar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company.
6.
CoxT. H.Jr. (1991). The multicultural organization. Academy of Management Executive, 5(2), 34–47.
7.
CoxT. H.Jr. & BlakeS. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness. Academy of Management Executive, 5(8), 45–56.
8.
FagensonE. A. (1989). The mentor advantage: Perceived career/job experiences of protégés versus non-protégés. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 309–320.
9.
GraysonJ. P. (1998). Racial origin and student retention in a Canadian university. Higher Education, 36(3), 323–352.
10.
Higher Education Research Institute. (1996). UCLA study finds number of college students successfully earning bachelor's degrees is declining. Retrieved October 29, 1999, on the World Wide Web: http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/heri/darcu.html.
11.
JacobiM. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 505–532.
12.
MooreK. M. & AmeyM. J. (1998). Some faculty leaders are born women. In SagariaM. A. D. (Ed.), Empowering women: Leadership development strategies on campus: New directions for student services, no. 44. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
NewbyT. J. & CornerJ. (1997). Mentoring for increased performance: Steps in the process. Performance Improvement, 36(5), 6–10.
14.
O'BrienE. M. (1989). Keeping them coming back for more: Retention personnel help schools hold onto minority students. Black Issues in Higher Education, 5(1), 3–5.
15.
ParatoreJ. (1984). The relationship between participation in a mentoring program and developmental growth and persistence of freshman students at Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.
16.
Phillips-JonesL. (1982). Mentors and protégés. New York: Arbor House.
17.
Professional Mentor Program Plus Official Records 2002–03. University of Detroit Mercy. Detroit, Michigan.
18.
Professional Mentor Program Plus Official Records 2003–04. University of Detroit Mercy. Detroit, Michigan.
ShandleyT. C. (1989). The use of mentors for leadership development. NASPA Journal, 27, 59–66.
21.
ThomasR. R.Jr. (1992). Managing diversity: A conceptual framework. In JacksonS. E. & Associates (Eds.), Diversity in the workplace (pp. 306–317). New York: Guilford Press.
22.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
