A great deal of research, notably by Prigerson and colleagues (e.g., Prigerson & Jacobs, 2001; see Prigerson & Maciejewski, this issue) and Horowitz and colleagues (e.g., Horowitz, this issue; Horowitz, Bonanno, & Holen, 1993), has recently been conducted with the purpose of establishing criteria for the designation of Complicated Grief (CG) as a mental disorder for inclusion in DSM-V. Some dissenting voices have been heard from teams of researchers adopting different approaches and/or using different criteria and diagnostic categorizations. We argue the need for a conceptual framework as a starting point for understanding the different positions on this CG—DSM controversy. This analysis is used as a tool to evaluate the questions posed by the Editor of this Special Issue, Colin Murray Parkes: (1) Should Complicated Grief be regarded as a psychiatric disorder? (2) Does the syndrome described by Prigerson and colleagues meet the required scientific criteria? Discrepancies emerge between scholars in the ways that they have conceptualized and assessed complicated grief and associated disorders: Examination of the positions of researchers within the framework reveals five systematically different approaches. We argue that potential criteria and diagnostic categorization systems emerging from the different perspectives need to be considered. General implications of DSM-V (non)inclusion are summarized.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
BeckA. T. (1967). Depression: Clinical, experimental and theoretical aspects. New York: Hoeber.
3.
BonannoG.WortmanC., & NesseR. (2004). Prospective patterns of resilience and maladjustment during widowhood. Psychology and Aging, 19, 260–271.
4.
BowlbyJ. (1980). Attachment and loss. Vol. III. Loss: Sadness and depression. London: Hogarth.
5.
ChorpitaB., & BarlowD. (1998). The development of anxiety: The role of control in early environment. Psychological Bulletin, 24, 3–21.
6.
ClaytonP. (1990). Bereavement and depression. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 51, 34–40.
7.
de KeijserJ. (1997). Sociale steun en professionele begeleiding bij rouw. [Social support and professional counseling for the bereaved]. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
8.
EthS., & PynoosR. (1985). Developmental perspectives on psychic trauma in childhood. In FigleyC. (Ed.), Trauma and its wake (pp. 36–52). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
9.
FaschingbauerT. R. (1981). Texas revised inventory of grief manual. Houston: Honeycomb.
10.
FaschingbauerT. R.ZisookS., & De VaulR. (1987). The Texas revised inventory of grief. In ZisookS. (Ed.), Biopsychosocial aspects of bereavement (pp. 111–124). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
11.
FigleyC., & KleberR. (1995). Beyond the “victim”: Secondary traumatic stress. In KleberR. J.FigleyC. R., & GersonsB. (Eds.), Beyond trauma: Cultural and societal dynamics (pp. 75–98). New York: Plenum.
12.
FigleyC. R.BrideB. E., & MazzaN. (1997). Death and trauma: The traumatology of grieving. Washington: Taylor & Francis.
13.
GreenB. (1994). Psychosocial research in traumatic stress: An update. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 7, 341–362.
14.
GreenB. (2000). Traumatic loss: Conceptual and empirical links between trauma and bereavement. Journal of Personal and Interpersonal Loss, 5, 1–17.
HorowitzM.WilnerN., & AlvarezW. (1979). Impact of event scale: A measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41, 209–218.
19.
HorowitzM.SiegelB.HolenA.BonannoG.MilbrathC., & StinsonC. (1997). Diagnostic criteria for complicated grief disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(7), 904–911.
20.
JacobsS. (1993). Pathologic grief: Maladaptation to loss. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
21.
JacobsS. (1999). Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel.
22.
KeaneT. K., & WolfeJ. (1990). Comorbidity in post-traumatic stress disorder: An analysis of community and clinical studies. Research findings [Special Issue]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 137–148.
23.
KlassD.SilvermanP., & NickmanS. (1996). Continuing bonds: Understanding the resolution of grief. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
24.
KleberR., & BromD. (1992). Coping with trauma: Theory, prevention and treatment. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
25.
LichtenthalW.CruessD., & PrigersonH. (2004). A case for establishing complicated grief as a distinct mental disorder in DSM-V. Clinical Psychology Review, 24, 637–662.
26.
MiddletonW.RaphaelB.MartinekN., & MissoV. (1993). Pathological grief reactions. In StroebeM.StroebeW., & HanssonR. O. (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement: Theory, research and intervention (pp. 44–61). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
MiddletonW.MoylanA.RaphaelB.BurnettP., & MartinekN. (1993). An international perspective on bereavement-related concepts. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 27, 457–463.
28.
NaderK. (1997). Assessing traumatic experiences in children. In WilsonJ. P. & KeaneT. M. (Eds.), Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD (pp. 291–348). New York: Guilford Press.
29.
NeimeyerR., & HoganN. (2001). Quantitative or qualitative? Measurement issues in the study of bereavement. In StroebeM.StroebeW.HanssonR. O., & SchutH. (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care (pp. 89–118). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
30.
ParkesC. M. (1996). Bereavement: Studies of grief in adult life (3rd ed.). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
31.
ParkesC. M., & WeissR. (1983). Recovery from bereavement. New York: Basic Books.
32.
PrigersonH., & JacobsS. (2001). Traumatic grief as a distinct disorder: A rationale, consensus criteria, and a preliminary empirical test. In StroebeM.StroebeW.HanssonR. O., & SchutH. (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care (pp. 613–645). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
33.
PrigersonH. & MaCiejewskiK. (this issue).
34.
PrigersonH.MaCiejewskiK., & RosenheckR. A. (2000). Preliminary explorations of the harmful interactive effects of widowhood and marital harmony on health, health service use, and health care costs. Gerontologist, 40, 349–357.
35.
PrigersonH.ShearMFrankE., & BeeryL. (1997). Traumatic grief: A case of loss-induced trauma. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 1003–1009.
36.
PynoosR. S., & NaderK. (1988). Psychological first aid and treatment approach to children exposed to community violence: Research implications. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 1, 445–473.
37.
RandoT. (2000). On the experience of traumatic stress in anticipatory and postdeath mourning. In RandoT. A. (Ed.), Clinical dimensions of anticipatory mourning (pp. 155–221). Champaign, IL: Research Press.
38.
RaphaelB. (1983). The anatomy of bereavement. New York: Basic Books.
39.
RaphaelB. (1997). The interaction of trauma and grief. In BlackD.NewmanM.Harris-HendriksJ. & MezeyG. (Eds.), Psychological trauma: A developmental approach (pp. 31–43). London: Gaskell.
40.
RaphaelB., & MartinekN. (1997). Assessing traumatic bereavement and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. In WilsonJ. P. & KeaneT. M., Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD (pp. 373–395). New York: Guilford Press.
41.
RaphaelB.MinkovC., & DobsonM. (2001). Psychotherapeutic and pharmacological intrervention for bereaved persons. In StroebeM.StroebeW.HanssonR. O., & SchutH. (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care (pp. 587–612). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
42.
RaphaelB.MiddletonW.MartinekN., & MissoV. (1993). Counseling and therapy of the bereaved. In StroebeM.StroebeW., & HanssonR. O. (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement: Theory, research and intervention (pp. 427–453). New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
RubinS. (1999). The Two-Track Model of Bereavement: Overview, retrospect, and prospect. Death Studies, 23, 681–714.
44.
SandersC. (1989). Grief: The mourning after: Dealing with adult bereavement. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
45.
SandersC.MaugerP., & StrongP. (1985/1991). A manual for the grief experience inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press/Charlotte, NC: Center for the Study of Separation and Loss.
46.
SchutH.de KeijserJ.van den BoutJ., & DijkhuisJ. (1991). Post-traumatic stress symptoms in the first years of conjugal bereavement. Anxiety Research, 4, 225–234.
47.
SimpsonM. A. (1997). Traumatic bereavements and death-related PTSD. In FigleyC. R.BrideB. E., & MazzaN., (Eds.), Death and trauma: The traumatology of grieving. Washington: Taylor & Francis.
48.
SirelingL.CohenD., & MarksI. (1988). Guided mourning for morbid grief: A controlled replication. Behavior Therapy, 19, 121–132.
49.
StroebeM.SchutH., & FinkenauerK.The traumatization of grief? A conceptual framework for understanding the trauma-bereavement interface. Israel Journal of Psychiatry, 38, 185–201.
50.
StroebeM.van SonM.StroebeW.KleberR.SchutH., & van den BoutJ. (2000). On the classification and diagnosis of pathological grief. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 57–75.
51.
StroebeW., & StroebeM. (1987). Bereavement and health: The psychological and physical consequences of partner loss. New York: Cambridge University Press.
52.
StroebeW.SchutH., & StroebeM. (2005). Grief work, disclosure and counseling: Do they help the bereaved?Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 395–414.
53.
WalterT. (this issue). What is complicated grief? A social constructionist perspective. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying.
54.
WeissD. S., & MarmarC. R. (1997). The Impact of Event Scale-Revised. In WilsonJ. P. & KeaneT. M., Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD (pp. 399–411). New York: Guilford Press.
