Gender issues are now receiving more attention on global and national health agendas. However, the evidence base for policy and practice in this area remains limited and conceptual confusion is still common. This article reviews the challenges facing epidemiologists and other researchers who aim to make their work more “gender sensitive.” It begins by exploring the concepts of biological “sex” and social “gender” and assesses their implications for the health of both women and men. It then reviews a range of strategies for mainstreaming sex and gender into health research. The article concludes with brief comments on the links between gender equity and wider equality concerns.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DoyalL., Gender equity in health: Debates and dilemmas. Soc. Sci. Med.51(6): 931–939, 2000.
2.
DoyalL., Sex, gender and health: The need for a new approach. BMJ7320: 1061–1063, 2001.
KriegerN., Epidemiology and social sciences: Towards a critical reengagement in the 21st century. Epidemiol. Rev.11: 155–163, 2000.
5.
PayneS., “Smoke like a man die like a man”? A review of the relationship between gender, sex and lung cancer. Soc. Sci. Med.53(8): 1067–1080, 2001.
6.
SundbyJ., Are women disfavoured in the estimation of Disability Adjusted Life Years and the Global Burden of Disease?Scand. J. Public Health27: 279–285, 1999.
7.
WizemannT., and PardueM.Exploring the Biological Contribution to Human Health: Does Sex Matter?National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2001.
