Do You Have the Time? Investigating Online Classroom Workload

Abstract

The time it takes to teach and take classes has been the subject of much speculation, but no accurate standard exists to measure the amount of time instructors and students dedicate to courses. The most common measure of workload has been the credit system. As administrators push faculty toward teaching online or adding online components to their existing classes, time commitment remains one of the strongest objections to teaching online. Characteristics of online environments (such as added flexibility) appeal to a growing number of students, elevating time management to an even more critical level. This study discusses a Web-based time log system used to measure during-course workload. The system was used in five masters-level classes over a 2-year period. It is contended that by using systems such as the one outlined herein, administrators, faculty, and students can better examine and determine the important but often neglected factor of workload.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amiel

McClendon

V. J.

Orey

(2003, February). It's about time: A case study of student time use and behaviors in a synchronous virtual classroom. Paper presented at the Eastern Educational Research Association, Hilton Head, GA.

Collis

Winnips

Moonen

(2000). Structure support versus learning choice via the World Wide Web (WWW): Where is the payoff? Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(2), 131–145.

DiBiase

(2000). Is distance teaching more work or less work? The American Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 6–20.

Hecht

J. B.

Schoon

P. L.

(1999, April). Using CU-SeeMe to deliver a masters-level class over the Internet. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Ontario, Canada.

Mahesh

McIsaac

M. S.

(1999, February). Distance education: Learner-teacher interaction and time spent by teaching. Paper presented at the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Houston, TX.

McElhinney

J. H.

Nasseh

(1999). Technical and pedagogical challenges faced by faculty and students in computer-based distance education in Indiana. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 27(4), 349–350.

Palloff

R. M.

Pratt

(1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Paulson

(2002). Reconfiguring faculty roles for virtual settings. Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 123–140.

Reeves

T. C.

(2003). Storm clouds on the digital education horizon. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(1), 3–26.

10.

Rockwell

S. K.

Schauer

Fritz

S. M.

Marx

D. B.

(1999). Incentives and obstacles influencing higher education faculty and administrators to teach via distance. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 2(4).

11.

Swan

Shea

Fredericksen

Pickett

Pelz

Maher

(2000). Building knowledge building communities: Consistency, contact and communication in the virtual classroom. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 23(4), 369–383.

12.

Smith

G. G.

Ferguson

Caris

(2001). Online vs face-to-face. (Internet/Web/Online Service Information). Technological Horizons in Educatzon, 28(9), 18–22.

13.

Visser

J. A.

(2000). Faculty work in developing and teaching Web-based distance courses: A case study of time and effort. The American Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 21–32.

14.

Watkins

Schlosser

(2003). It's not about time: A fresh approach to educational equivalency. Tech Trends, 47(3), 35–39.

15.

Wolcott

L. L.

(1998, April). Faculty issues pertaining to institutional support and reward practices in distance education. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.