This study explores the views on learning, technology and classroom practices of both students and teachers in a technology-enriched classroom environment. It examined the characteristics and uniqueness of 4th-6th grade students' views and the changes in their teachers' views as result of longitudinal experiences of an innovative approach to learning and teaching that focused on learning through information rich tasks in a technology rich environment. The main findings show that in almost all participating classrooms, students' views were aligned with constructivist ideologies and mainly emphasized the characteristics of authentic and social-dialogical learning and its contribution to their cognitive development. The findings also express three key views regarding learning in an information-rich environment: learning from ICT, about ICT, and with ICT. The findings demonstrate the multi-dimensional nature of teachers' beliefs, and reflect the complex nature of the relationship between students' views and teachers' educational beliefs and practices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamyP. (2000). The influence of organizational culture on technology integration in teacher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
2.
AkerlindG., & TrevittC. (1995). Enhancing learning through technology: When students resist the change. Proceedings of ASCILITE 1995, December 4–6.
3.
AlexanderS. (1999). An evaluation of innovative projects involving communication and information technology in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(2), 173–183.
4.
BakerR. G., & MorozW. (1996). Student perceptions of the teaching/learning processes of teachers: How close is the partnership? Paper presented at the combined meeting of the Educational Research Association (Singapore) and the Australian Association for Research in Education, Singapore.
5.
BakerR., & MorozW. (1997). Student and teacher processes perceptions of teaching/learning processes in classrooms: How close is the partnership?Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 22(1).
6.
BarbrowE.JeongM., & ParksS. (1996). Computer experiences and attitudes of students and preceptors in distance education. Journal of the American Dietetic Association [serial online]. 96(12), 1280.
7.
BarreauD.EslingerD.McGoffK., & TonnesenC. (1993). Group collaboration in the virtual classroom: An evaluation of collaborative learning in the virtual classroom of CMSC 828S and the technology that supports it. Journal of Virtual Experience [serial online].
8.
BergenC., & KingstonP. (1994). A framework for analyzing the contribution of educational technology to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 58–60.
9.
BoethelM., & DimockV. (1999). Constructing knowledge with technology: A review of the literature. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
10.
Boulton-LewisG. M.WillisL., & LewisD. (2003). Dissonance between conceptions of learning and ways of learning for Indigenous Australian university students. Studies in Higher Education, 28(1), 79–89.
11.
BransfordJ. D.BrownA. L., & CockingR. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available online at: http://www.nap.edu.
12.
BrekelmansM.WubbelsTh., & den BrokP. (2002). Teacher experience and the teacher-student relationship in the classroom environment. In GohS. C. & KhineM. S. (Eds.), Studies in educational learning environments: An international perspective (pp. 73–1000). Singapore: New World Scientific.
13.
BurgeE. (1994). Learning in computer conferenced contexts: The learner's perspective. Journal of Distance Education, 9(1), 19–43.
14.
BrooksJ. G., & BrooksM. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. ASCD, Virginia.
15.
BrownJ. S.CollinsA., & DuguidP. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher18, 32–42.
16.
CaravitaS., & HalldenO.Re-framing the problem of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 89–111.
17.
CEDL Lucent Technologies Center for Excellence in Distance Learning. (1999). Student attitudes toward distance learning. Distance Learning Abstracts [series online]. Available at: http://www.lucent.com/cedl/stdtatt.html
18.
ChanK. (2000). Teacher education students' epidemiological beliefs: A cultural perspective on learning and teaching. Paper presented at the AARE Conference, University of Sydney.
19.
ChappleS. (1999). Understanding student learning. In MartinK.StanleyN., & DavisonN. (Eds.), Teaching in the disciplines/learning in context (pp. 67–71). Proceedings of the 8th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, The University of Western Australia, February 1999. Perth: UWA. Available at: http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf1999/chapple.html
20.
Cook-SatherA. (2002). Authorizing students' perspectives: Toward trust, dialogue, and change in education. Educational Researcher, 31(4), 3–14.
21.
CopeC., & WardP. (2002). Integrating technology into classrooms: The importance of teachers' perceptions. Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), 436–452.
22.
ClandininD. J., & ConnellyF. M. (1996). Teachers' professional knowledge landscapes: Teacher stories—stories of teachers—school stories—stories of schools. Educational Researcher, 25(3), 24–30.
23.
CothranD. J., & EnnisC. D. (1997). Students' and teachers' perceptions of conflict and power. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 541–553.
24.
CothranD. J., & EnnisC. D. (1998). Curricula of mutual worth: Comparisons of students' and teachers' curricular goals. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17, 307–327.
CubanL. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
CubanL.KirkpatrickH., & PeckC. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813–834.
28.
CullingfordC. (1991). The inner world of school: Children's ideas about schools. London: Cassell Educational Limited.
29.
CzerniakC. M., & LumpeA. T. (1996). Relationship between teacher beliefs and science education reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 7(4), 247–266.
30.
d'ApolloniaS., & AbramiP. C. (1996). Variables moderating the validity of student ratings of instruction: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the 77th Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, April 1996.
31.
DeaneyR.RuthvenK., & HennessyS. (2003). Teachers' developing ‘practical theories’ of the contribution of information and communication technologies to supporting subject teaching and learning: An analysis of cases from English secondary schools. British Educational Research Journal.
DedeC. (2000). Emerging influences of information technology on school curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2), 281–303.
34.
den BrokP. (2001). Teaching and student outcomes. Utrecht, The Netherlands: W. C.
35.
den BrokP.BergenT.StahlR. J., & BrekelmansM. (2004). Students' perceptions of teacher control behaviors. Learning and Instruction, 14(4), 425–443.
36.
DhaifH. (1990). Computer assisted language learning: A client's view. CALICO, 7(4), 67–81.
37.
DoyleW. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 392–431). New York: Macmillan.
38.
DunkinM. J., & PreciansR. P. (1992). Award-winning university teachers' conceptions of teaching. Higher Education, 24, 483–502.
39.
EadieG. (2000). The impact of ICT on schools: Classroom design and curriculum delivery. Study of Schools in Australia, USA, England and Hong Kong, 2000. Wellington.
40.
ErtmerP.AddisonP.LaneM.RossE., & WoodsD. (1999). Examining teachers' beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 54–72.
41.
FarrellE.PegueroG.LindseyR., & WhiteR. (1988). Giving voice to high school students: Pressure and boredom, ya know what I'm sayin'?American Educational Research Journal, 25, 489–502.
42.
FisherC.DwyerD. C., & YocamK. (Eds.). (1996). Education and technology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43.
FisherD. L.FraserB. J., & RickardsT. (1997). Gender and cultural differences in teacher-student interpersonal behaviour. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
44.
FoellN. A., & FritzR. L. (1995). Association of cognitive style and satisfaction with distance learning. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education [serial online], 33(1), 46–59. Available at: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JITE/v33n1/foell.html.
45.
FullanM. G. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
46.
FullanM. G. (2001). Leading a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
47.
FultonK., & Torney-PurtaJ. (2000). How teachers' beliefs about teaching and learning are reflected in their use of technology: Case studies from urban middle schools. Paper presented at the International Conference on Learning with Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
48.
GibsonI. W. (2001). At the intersection of technology and pedagogy: Considering styles of learning and teaching. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(1/2), 37–61.
49.
GouldenN. R., & GriffinC. J. (1997). Comparison of university faculty and student beliefs about the meaning of grades. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 312, 27–37.
50.
GrabowskiB. (1996). Generative learning: Past, present and future. In JonassenD. H. (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and telecommunications (pp. 897–919). New York: Simon & Schuster.
51.
GravosoR. S.PasaA. E., & MoriT. (2002). Influence of students' prior learning experiences, learning conceptions and approaches on their learning outcomes. Research and Development in Higher Education: Quality Conversations, Perth, Australia, Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia, Inc., 282–289.
52.
GreenoJ.CollinsA., & ResnickL. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In BerlinerD. C. and CalfeeR. C. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. New York: Macmillan Library Reference.
53.
GuernseyL. (1998). Distance education for the not-so-distant. Chronicle of Higher Education [serial online], 45(3), A29–A30.
54.
GunstoneR. F. (1994). The importance of specific science content in the enhancement of metacognition. In FenshamP. J.GunstoneR. F., & WhiteR. T. (Eds.), The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. London: Falmer Press.
55.
HaraN., & KlingR. (1999). Students' frustrations with a web-based distance education course. [Electronic Journal]. firstmonday, 4(12). Retrieved April 24, 2002 from: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue4_12/hara/index.html.
56.
HennessyS.RuthvenK., & BrindleyS. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155–192.
57.
HiltzS. R. (1998). Impacts of college-level courses via asynchronous learning networks: Some preliminary results. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks [serial online]. August, 1(2).
58.
HoferB. K., & PintrichP. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140.
59.
HoneyM.CulpK. M., & CarriggF. (2000). Perspectives on technology and education research: Lessons from the past and present. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(1), 5–14.
60.
JonassenD. (1995). Supporting communities of learners with technology: A vision for integrating technology with learning in schools. Educational Technology, 35(4), 60–63.
61.
JonassenD. H. (2000). Transforming learning with technology: Beyond modernism and post-modernism or whoever controls the technology creates the reality. Educational Technology, 40(2), 21–25.
62.
KemberD.KwanK., & LedesmaJ. (2001). Conceptions of good teaching and how they influence the way adults and school leavers are taught. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20(5), 393–404.
63.
KendallM. (2001). Teaching online to campus-based students: The experience of using WebCT for the community information module at Manchester Metropolitan University. Education for Information, 19, 325–346.
64.
KingJ. A. (1995). Fear or frustration? Students' attitudes toward computers and school. The Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 27, 154–170.
65.
KinnearA. (1995). Introduction of microcomputers: A case study of patterns of use and children's perceptions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 27–40.
66.
LeachJ., & MoonJ. (2000). Pedagogy, information and communications. The Curriculum Journal, 11(3), 385–404.
67.
LemkeC., & CoughlinE. C. (1998). Technology in American schools. Seven dimensions for gauging progress. Milken Exchange Commission on Educational Technology. [Online]. http://www.mff.org/pubs/ME158.pdf.
LevinB. (2000). Putting students at the centre in education reform. International Journal of Educational Change, 1(2), 155–172.
70.
LevinT. (1999). The nonlinear curriculum. In SharanS.ShacharH., & LevinT. (Eds.), The innovative school, organization and instruction. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.
71.
LevyJ.den BrokP.WubbelsT., & BrekelmansM. (2003). Students' perceptions of interpersonal aspects of the learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 6(1), 5–36.
72.
LewisR. B.AshtonT. M.HaapaB.KieleyC. L., & FieldenC. (1999). Improving the writing skills of students with learning disabilities: Are word processors with spelling and grammar checkers useful?Learning Disabilities, 9, 87–98.
73.
LincolnY. S., & GubaE. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74.
Lucent Technologies Center for Excellence in Distance Learning (CEDL). (1999). Student attitudes toward distance learning. Distance Learning Abstracts [serial online]. Available at: http://www.lucent.com/cedl/stdtatt.html. Accessed June 16, 1999.
75.
MadduxC. D.JohnsonL., & WillisJ. W. (1997). Educational computing: Learning with tomorrow's technologies (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
76.
MannB. (2000). Internet provision of enrichment opportunities to school and home. Journal of the Australian Council for Educational Computing, 15(1), 17–21.
77.
MartonF. (1986). Phenomenography—A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49.
78.
MartonF., & SaljoR. (1984). Approaches to learning. In MartonF., & EntwistleN. (Eds.), The experience of learning in Edinburgh. Scottish Academic Press.
79.
McCargarD. F. (1993). Teacher and student role expectations: Cross-cultural differences and implications. The Modern Language Journal, 77, 192–207.
80.
McLoughlinC. (1998). Participation, cooperation and autonomy: Students' perceptions of learning at a distance using technology. In McBeathC. and AtkinsonR. (Eds.), Planning for progress, partnership and profit. Proceedings of EdTech'98. Perth: Australian Society for Educational Technology. Available at: http://www.aset.org.au/confs/edtech98/pubs/articles/mcloughlin1.html
81.
MillsS., & TincherR. (2003). Be the technology: A developmental model for evaluating technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(3), 382.
82.
MitraD. L. (2004). The significance of students: Can increasing “student voice” in schools lead to gains in youth development?Teachers College Record, 106(4), 651–688.
NealL.RamsayJ., & PreeceJ. (1997). Distance learning: A CHI 97 special interst group. SIGCHI Bulletin, 29(4), 76–78.
85.
NewhouseP. (1998). The impact of portable computers on classroom learning environments. The Australian Journal of Educational Computing, 13(1), 5–11.
86.
NichollsJ. G. (1992). Students as educational theorists. In SchunkD. & MeeceJ. (Eds.), Students' perceptions in the classroom (pp. 267–286). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
NormanD. A. (1993). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
89.
NystrandM. (1997). Opening dialogue. New York: Teachers College Press.
90.
OldfatherP. (1995). Songs “come back most to them”: Students' experiences as researchers. Theory Into Practice, 34(2), 131.
91.
OliverR., & McLoughlinC. (1997). Interactions in audiographics teaching and learning environments. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(1), 34–55.
92.
OliverT. A., & ShapiroF. (1993). Self-efficacy and computers. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 20, 81–85.
93.
PajaresM. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.
94.
ParrJ. M. (1999). Going to school the technological way: Co-constructed classrooms and student perceptions of learning with technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(4), 365–377.
95.
PetersonP. L. (1988). Teachers' and students' cognitional knowledge for classroom teaching and learning. Educational Researcher, 17(5), 5–14.
96.
ProctorR., & BurnettP. C. (1996). Computer attitude and classroom computers. Computers in the Schools, 12(3), 33–41.
97.
ProsserM., & TrigwellK. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
98.
RichardsC. N., & RidleyD. R. (1997). Factors affecting college students' persistence in on-line computer-managed instruction. College Student Journal [serial online]. December, 1997. 490–5. Available at: WilsonSelect through OCLC FirstSearch. Accessed April 9, 1999.
99.
RickardsT. (1998). “The relationship of teacher-student interpersonal behavior with student sex, cultural background and student outcomes.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia.
100.
RickardsT., & FisherD. L. (1997). A report of research into student attitude and teacher student interpersonal behaviour in a large sample of Australian secondary mathematics classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australia, Rotorua, New Zealand.
101.
RokeachM. (1972). Beliefs, attitudes and values. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
102.
RoschelleJ. M.PeaR. D.HoadleyC. M.GordinD. N., & MeansB. M. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The Future of Children, 10(2), 76–101.
103.
RuthvenK.HennessyS., & DeaneyR. (2005). Incorporating internet resources into classroom practice: Pedagogical perspectives and strategies of secondary-school subject teachers. Computers and Education, 44(1), 1–34. Available online at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03601315.
104.
SalomonG. (1990). The computer lab: A bad idea now sanctified. Educational Technology, 30, 50–52.
105.
SalomonG. (1992). Effects with and of computers and the study of computer-based learning environments. In De CorteE.LinnM.MandlH., & VerschaffelL. (Eds.), Computer-based learning environments and problem-solving (pp. 247–262). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
106.
SalomonG.PerkinsD. N., & GlobersonT. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20, 2–9.
107.
ScaifeM., & RogersY. (1999). Kids as informants: Telling us what we didn't know or confirming what we knew already? In DruinA. (Ed.), The design of children's technology, pp. 27–50. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
108.
ShawG., & MarlowN. (1999). The role of student learning styles, gender, attitudes and perceptions on information and communication technology assisted learning. Computers & Education, 33, 223–234.
109.
ShuellT. J. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 411–436.
110.
ShuellT. J. (1996). Teaching and learning in a classroom context. In BerlinerD. C. & CalfeeR. C. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 726–764). New York: Macmillan.
111.
SpennemannD. H. R. (1996). Computers in environmental education. Assignment submission via electronic mail: Problems and opportunities. School of Environmental and Information Sciences Report, Charles Stuart University School of Environmental and Information Sciences, Albury, Vol. 9.
112.
TavaresJ.BrzezinskiI., & SilvaI. H. (2000). “Having coffee” with professors and students to talk about higher education pedagogy and academic success. Paper presented at the ASET/HERDSA (Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia) Conference, Toowoomba, Queensland.
113.
TolhurstD. (2004). The influence of web-supported independent activities and small group work on students' epistemological beliefs. Proceedings of the sixth conference on Australian computing education, 30, 311–316 (Dunedin, New Zealand).
114.
TrigwellK.ProsserM., & WaterhouseF. (1999). Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57–70.
115.
TynjalaP. (1997). Developing education students' conceptions of the learning process in different learning environments. Learning and Instruction, 7, pp. 277–292.
116.
ValentaA.TherriaultD.DieterM., & MrtekR. (2001). Identifying student attitudes and learning styles in distance education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2).
117.
WadmanyR. (2004). “Learning in a technology-rich environment focused on information-rich tasks: Change patterns and development of educational beliefs and teaching and learning processes among teachers and students.” Doctoral thesis. Tel Aviv University, Israel.
118.
WadmanyR., & LevinT. (2004). The use of Information technologies in the classrooms: Patterns of change and development in educational beliefs and in educational practices among teachers and their students. Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference2004(1), 4295–4299. [Online]. Available: http://dl.aace.org/15128.
119.
WegerifR. (1998). The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks [Electronic Journal]. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(1). Retrieved April 25, 2002 from: http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/vol2_issue1/wegerif.htm
120.
WestR. (1998). Learning for life: Final report of the review of higher education financing and policy. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Services. Available at: http://www.detya.gov.au/archive/highered/hereview/toc.htm.
121.
WilssL.Boulton-LewisG.MartonF., & LewisD. (1999). Learning in and out of university: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students' conceptions and strategies used to learn. Paper presented at the HERDSA Annual International Conference, Melbourne, Victoria.
122.
WittorockM. C. (1986). Students' thought processes. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 297–314). New York: Macmillan.
123.
WoolfolkA. E. (1995). Educational Psychology (6th ed.). USA: Allyn and Bacon.
124.
WubbelsT., & BrekelmansM. (1998). The teacher factor in the social climate of the classroom. In FraserB. J. & TobinK. G. (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 565–580). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
125.
WubbelsT., & LevyJ. (1993). Do you know what you look like?London: The Falmer Press.
126.
YinR. K. (1992). The case study method as a tool for doing evaluation. Current Sociology, 40(1), 119–137.
127.
ZeidnerM. (1994). Reactions of students and teachers toward key facets of classroom testing. School Psychology International, 15, 39–53.
128.
ZhaoY., & FrankK. A. (2004). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840.
129.
ZhangP. (1998). A case study on technology use in distance learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education [serial online], 30(4), 398–419.
