Colleges are under mounting pressure to increase retention rates by easing incoming students' academic and social transition to college. Finding time in first-year students' busy schedules to provide this additional support can be difficult, however. Thus, the Clipper Project set out to test whether offering online, college level courses to high school seniors might be one way postsecondary institutions could “reach out” to incoming students and help them begin their transition to college before matriculation. We found that early engagement with the University can help participants adjust more quickly, but the best time to engage incoming students may not be during the second semester of the high school senior year.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abbott-ChapmanJ.HughesP., & WyldC. (1992). Monitoring student progress: A framework for improving student performance and reducing attrition in higher education. Australia: University of Tasmania, Youth Studies Centre.
2.
American College Testing. (2001). More first-year college students return for second year: Fewer students graduate in five years. Retrieved March 2003, from http://www.act.org/news/releases/2001/04-26-01.html.
3.
AryD.JacobsL. C., & RazaviehA. (2002). Introduction to research in education (6th ed.). Stamford, CT: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
4.
BakerR. W., & SirykB. (1999). SACQ: Student adaptation to college questionnaire. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
5.
BiddleB. J., & AndersonD. S. (1986). Theory, methods, knowledge, and research on teaching. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 230–252). New York: Macmillan.
6.
BishopM. J., & WhiteS. A. (2004). Clipper II: Interim narrative and financial report. Prepared for the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Available online at: http://clipper.lehigh/edu.
7.
BishopM. J., & WhiteS. A. (2005). Clipper II: A web-based curriculum research and development initiative—Final Report. Prepared for the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Available online in December at: http://clipper.lehigh.edu.
8.
BraxtonJ. M., & MundyM. E. (2002). Powerful institutional levers to reduce college student departure. Journal of College Student Retention, 3(1), 91–118.
9.
BraxtonJ. M.SullivanA. S., & JohnsonR. M. (1997). Appraising Tinto's theory of college student departure. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and Research (Vol. 12, pp. 107–164). New York: Agathon.
10.
BurdS. (2001). Colleges catch a glimpse of Bush policy on higher education, and aren't pleased. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved March 2003, from: http://www.chronicle.com/government.
11.
ClarkR. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29.
GallM. D.GallJ. P., & BorgW. R. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
15.
GallagherD. J., & AllenN. (2000). First-year initiatives and results of a year-long advising pilot study: A proposed advising model. Journal of the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 12(2), 107–128.
GoreP. A. (2006). Academic self-efficacy as a predictor of college outcomes: Two incremental validity studies. Journal of Career Assessment, 14(1), 92–115.
18.
HammersleyM. (1996). The relationship between qualitative and quantitative research: Paradigm loyalty versus methodological eclecticism. In RichardsonJ. T. E. (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences. Leicester, England: BPS Books.
19.
JohnsonR. B., & OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
20.
KearsleyG. (2000). Online education: Learning and teaching in cyberspace. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
21.
KoutsoubakisD. (1999). A test of effectiveness of a one-term freshman orientation program at the foreign campus of an accredited private American university. Journal of the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 11(2), 33–58.
22.
McGahaV., & FitzpatrickJ. (2005). Personal and social contributors to dropout risk for undergraduate students. College Student Journal, 39, 287–298.
23.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). Projections of Education Statistics to 2010 (No. NCES-2000-071). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
24.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). Enrollment in Postsecondary Institutions, Fall 2003; Graduation Rates 1997 & 2000 Cohorts; and Financial Statistics, Fiscal Year 2003 (No. NCES 2005-177). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
PorterS. R., & SwingR. L. (2006). Understanding how first-year seminars affect persistence. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 89–109.
27.
ReevesT. C. (2003). Storm clouds on the digital education horizon. Journal of Computer in Higher Education, 15(1), 3–26.
28.
RosenthalR., & RosnowR. L. (1975). The volunteer subject. New York: Wiley.
29.
RussellT. L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.
30.
SchnellC. A.LouisK. S., & DoetkottC. (2003). The first-year seminar as a means of improving college graduation rates. Journal of the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 15(1), 53–75.
31.
SchutteN. S., & MalouffJ. M. (2002). Incorporating emotional skills content in a college transition course enhances student retention. Journal of the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 14(1), 7–21.
32.
SeidmanA. (Ed.). (2005). College student retention: Formula for student success. Portsmouth, NH: Greenwood.
33.
SmithP. (2004). The quiet crisis: How higher education is failing America. Bolton, MA: Anker.
34.
SoldnerL.LeeY., & DubyP. (1999). Welcome to the block: Developing freshman learning communities that work. Journal of College Student Retention, 1(2), 115–129.
35.
StarkeM. C.HarthM., & SirianniF. (2001). Retention, bonding, and academic achievement: Success of a first-year seminar. Journal of the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 13(2), 7–35.
36.
TintoV. (1999). Taking retention seriously: Rethinking the first year of college. National Academic Advising Association Journal, 19(2), 5–9.
37.
TreismanU. (1990). Academic perestroika: Teaching, learning, and the faculty's role in turbulent times. The FIPSE Lecture. Retrieved March, 2002, from: http://www.ed.gov/offices/OPE/FIPSE/Perestroika/.
WalkerR. (1985). An introduction to applied qualitative research. In WalkerR. (Ed.), Applied qualitative research (pp. 3–26). Aldershot, England: Gower.
40.
WolaninT. R. (Ed.) (2003). Reauthorizing the Higher Education Act: Issues and options. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy.
41.
YockeyF. A., & GeorgeA. A. (1998). The effects of a freshman seminar paired with supplemental instruction. Journal of the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 10(2), 57–76.
