Structured within an expanded econometric theoretical framework, this study uses national data sources to identify the critical factors that influence college graduates' advance to and persistence in graduate education and to compare the systematic differences between students in the STEM and non-STEM majors. The findings indicate that there is a high attrition rate from graduate education in both STEM and non-STEM majors. Male, Caucasian, and students who received their bachelor degree at a traditional (younger) age are more likely to attend and complete graduate education, regardless of academic major. Major-based differences are apparent in the impact from variables including parents' education, total undergraduate debt, institution selectivity, and student's academic background measured by SAT/ACT scores and cumulative GPA in undergraduate major.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndrieuS. C. & St. JohnE. P. (1993). The influence of prices on graduate student persistence. Research in Higher Education, 34, 399–419.
2.
BairdL. L. (1976). Who goes to graduate school and how they get there. In KatzJ. & HartnettR. T. (Eds.), Scholars in the making. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
3.
BowenW. G. & BokD. C. (1998). The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
BowenW. G. & RudenstineN. L. (1992). In pursuit of the PhD. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl.), 95–120.
6.
Council of Graduate Schools. (2004). Ph.D. completion and attrition: Policy, numbers, leadership and next steps. Washington, DC: Author.
7.
EhrenbergR. G. (1991). Academic labor supply. In ClotfelterC. T.EhrenbergR.G.GetzM. & SiegfriedJ. J. (Eds.), Economic challenges in higher education (pp. 143–260). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
EthingtonC. & SmartJ. (1986). Persistence to graduate education. Research in Higher Education, 24, 287–303.
9.
FlyerF. A. (1997). The influence of higher moments of earnings distributions of career decisions. Journal of Labor Economics, 15(4), 689–713.
10.
GardnerS. K. (2010). Keeping up with the Joneses: Socialization and culture in doctoral education at one striving institution. Journal of Higher Education, 81(6), 728–749.
11.
GoldeC. M. (2005). The role of the department and disciplines in doctoral student attrition: Lessons from four departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(6), 669–700.
12.
GoyetteK. A. & MullenA. L. (2006). Who studies the arts and sciences? Social background and the choice and consequences of undergraduate field of study. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 497–538.
13.
GriffithA. L. (2010). Persistent of women and minorities in the STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters. Economics of Education Review, 29, 911–922.
14.
HosmerD. & LemeshowS. (2000). Applied logistic regression analysis(2nd ed.). New York, NY: A Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
15.
JoyL. (2000, May). Do colleges shortchange women? Gender differences in the transition from college to work. Papers and Proceedings of the One Hundred Twelfth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association (pp. 471–475).
16.
KingS. E. & Chepyator-ThomsonJ. R. (1996). Factors affecting the enrollment and persistence of African-American doctoral students. Physical Educator, 53, 170–180.
17.
KingstonP. & ClawsonJ. (1986). Getting on the fast track: Recruitment at an elite business school. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 5(4), 1–17.
18.
LamontM. & LareauA. (1988). Cultural capital: Allusions, gaps and glissandos in recent theoretical developments. Sociological Theory, 6, 153–168.
19.
MalcomL. E. & DowdA. C. (2012). The impact of undergraduate debt on the graduate school enrollment of STEM baccalaureates. The Review of Higher Education, 35(2), 265–305.
20.
McNealR. B. (1999). Parental involvement as social capital: Differential effectiveness on science, achievement, truancy, and dropping out. Social Forces, 78, 117–144.
21.
MillettC. M. (2003). How undergraduate loan debt affects application and enrollment in graduate or first professional school. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(4), 386–427.
22.
MonksJ. (2000). The returns to individual and college characteristics: Evidence from the national longitudinal survey of youth. Economics of Education Review, 19(3), 279–289.
23.
MorrowV. (1999). Conceptualizing social capital in relation to the well-being of children and young people: A critical review. Sociological Review, 47, 744–765.
24.
PampelF. C. (2000). Logistic regression: A primer. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07–132. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
25.
PascarellaE. T. & TerenziniP. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26.
PaulsenM. B. & St. JohnE. P. (2002). Social class and college costs: Examining the financial nexus between college choice and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 73, 189–236.
27.
PengC. J.SoT. S. H.StageF. K. & St. JohnE. P. (2002). The use and interpretation of logistic regression in higher education journals. Research in Higher Education, 43, 259–294.
28.
PernaL. W. (2004). Understanding the decision to enroll in graduate school: Sex and racial/ethnic group differences. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(5), 487–527.
29.
RoksaJ. & LeveyT. (2010). What can you do with that degree? College major and occupational status of college graduates over time. Social Forces, 89(2), 389–416.
30.
SacksP. (2010). Rethinking the rules of the higher education game: Rising tuition isn't the only obstacle to equitable higher education access. Academe Online, July–August 2010. Retrieved October 13, 2011 from http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2010/JA/feat/sack.htm Sax, L. J. (2001). Undergraduate science majors: Gender differences in who goes to graduate school. The Review of Higher Education, 24(2), 153–172.
31.
SmartJ. C. (1986). College effects on occupational status attainment. Research in Higher Education, 24, 73–95.
32.
StaniecJ. F. O. (2004). The effects of race, sex, and expected returns on the choice of college major. Eastern Economic Journal, 30(4), 549–562.
33.
StoeckerJ. L. & PascarellaE. T. (1991). Women's college and women's career attainments revisited. Journal of Higher Education, 62(4), 394–406.
34.
ThomasS. L. & HeckR. H. (2001). Analysis of large-scale secondary data in higher education research: Potential perils associated with complex sampling designs. Research in Higher Education, 42(5), 517–540.
35.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
36.
WeilerW. C. (1991). The effect of undergraduate student loans on the decision to pursue post-baccalaureate study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13, 212–220.
37.
ZhangL. (2005). Advance to graduate education: The effect of college quality and undergraduate majors. The Review of Higher Education, 28(3), 313–338.
