The struggle to get weak students to use learning support services plagues virtually all retention programs (Friedlander, 1980; Hodges, 2001; Karabenick & Knapp, 1988; Moore & LeDee, 2006; Simpson, Hynd, Nist, & Burrell, 1997; Webster & Dee, 1998). This study presents a cost-effective form of supplemental instruction (SI), in the form of on-line tutorials, ultra-short digital instruction suitable for high enrollment courses, designed to engage underprepared or poorly motivated students pass their required courses. Participation among the low achievers was 39.3%, improving their exam scores about a half a letter grade over non-users and students in control sections, even without giving course credit for using the SI resource. Surveys reveal what aspects of the tutorials were most effective and valued.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AyresP. (2006). Impact of reducing intrinsic cognitive load on learning in a mathematical domain. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 298–298.
2.
BlancR.DeBuhrL. E. & MartinD. C. (1983). Breaking the attrition cycle: The effects of supplemental instruction on undergraduate performance and attrition. Journal of Higher Education, 54(1), 80–90.
3.
ClarkR.NguyenF. & SwellerJ. (2006). Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4.
CommanderN. E. & StrattonC. B. (1996). A learning assistance model for expanding academic support. Journal of Developmental Education, 20(2), 8–14.
5.
CongoD. H. (2002). How supplemental instruction stacks up against Arthus Chickering's 7 principles for good practice in undergraduate education. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 19(1), 75–83.
6.
CongoD. H. & SchoepsN. (1993). Does supplemental instruction really work and what is it anyway?Studies in Higher Education, 18(2), 165–176.
7.
FriedlanderJ. (1980). Are college support programs and services reaching high-risk students?Journal of College Student Personnel, 21(1), 23–28.
8.
FriesS.SchmidS.DietzF. & HoferM. (2005). Conflicting values and their impact on learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XX(3), 259–273.
9.
GoodT. L.SlavingsR. L.HarelK. H. & EmersonH. (1987). Student passivity: A study of question asking in K-12 classrooms. Sociology of Education, 60, 181–199.
10.
HodgesR. (2001). Encouraging high-risk student participation in tutoring and supplemental instruction. Journal of Developmental Education, 24(3), 2–9.
11.
HodgesR.DochenC. W. & JoyD. (2001). Increasing students' success: When supplemental instruction becomes mandatory. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 3(2), 143–156.
12.
HsiehP.-H.SullicanJ. R. & GuerraN. S. (2007). A closer look at college students: Self-efficacy and goal orientation. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18, 454–476.
13.
KarabenickS. A. & KnappJ. R. (1988). Help seeking and the need for academic assistance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 406–408.
14.
KarabenickS. A. & KnappJ. R. (1991). Relationship of academic help seeking to the use of learning strategies and other instructional achievement behavior in college students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 221–230.
15.
KeimigR. T. (1983). Raising academic standards: A guide to learning improvement. In FifeJ. D. (Ed.), ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report (Vol. 4, pp. 1–100). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
16.
KenneyP. A. & KallisonJ. M. J. (1994). Research studies on the effectiveness of supplemental instruction in mathematics. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 60, 75–82.
17.
KimY.BaylorA. L. & GroupP. (2006). Pedagogical agents as learning companions: The role of agent competency and type of interaction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 54(3), 223–243.
18.
KornerC. (2005). Concepts and misconceptions in comprehension of hierarchical graphs. Learning and Instruction, 15, 281–296.
19.
LinnenbrinkE. A. & PintrichP. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 313–327.
20.
MartinD. C. & ArendaleD. (1992). Supplemental instruction: Improving first-year student success in high-risk courses. Columbia, SC: Center for the Study of Freshman Year Experience, South Carolina University.
21.
MartinD. C. & BlancR. (2001). Video-based supplemental instruction. Journal of Developmental Education, 24(3), 12–19.
22.
MayerR. E.MathiasA. & WetzellK. (2002). Fostering understanding of multimedia messages through pre-training: Evidence for a two-stage theory of mental model construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8(3), 147–154.
23.
McCarthyA. & SmutsB. (1997). Assessing the effectiveness of supplemental instruction: A critique and a case study. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 221–231.
24.
McGuireS. Y. (2006). The impact of supplemental instruction on teaching students “how” to learn. New Directions for teaching and learning (Vol. 106, pp. 3–10). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
25.
MooreR. & LeDeeO. (2006). Supplemental instruction and the performance of developmental education students in an introductory biology course. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 36(2), 9–20.
26.
MullerD. A.BewerJ.SharmaM. D. & ReimannP. (2007). Saying the wrong thing: Improving learning with multimedia by including misconceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 144–155.
27.
RobbinsS. B.AllenJ.CasilliasA. & PetersonC. H. (2006). Unraveling the differential effects of motivational and skills, social and self-management measures from traditional predictors of college outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 598–616.
28.
SargentC. S.BorthickA. F. & LederbergA. R. (2011). Improving retention for principles of accounting students: Ultra-short online tutorials for motivating effort and improving performance. Issues in Accounting Education, 26(4), 657–679.
29.
SimpsonM. L.HyndC. R.NistS. L. & BurrellK. I. (1997). College academic assistance programs and practices. Educational Psychology Review, 9(1), 39–87.
30.
SmithJ. P. I.diSessaA. A. & RoschelleJ. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115–163.
31.
StansburyS. (2001). Accelerated learning groups enhance supplemental instruction for at-risk students. Journal of Developmental Education, 24(3), 20–27.
32.
SwellerJ. & ChandlerP. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12(3), 185–233.
33.
TintoV. (2006a). Enhancing student persistence: Lessons learned in the United States. Analise Psicologica, 1(XXIV), 7–13.
34.
TintoV. (2006b). Research and practice of student retention: What next?Journal of College Student Retention, 8(1), 1–19.
35.
ToppingA. J. (1996). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. Higher Education, 32, 321–345.
36.
WebsterT. J. & DeeK. C. (1998). Supplemental instruction integrated into an introductory engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 377–383.
