Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2010-11
American Indian/Alaskan Native Undergraduate Retention at Predominantly White Institutions: An Elaboration of Tinto's Theory of College Student Departure
This article reports findings from a major public university sponsored study undertaken with the intention of (a) improving university understanding of factors affecting American Indian/Alaskan Native (AI/AN) undergraduates' persistence at this institution, and (b) identifying in what areas, and in what manner, this institution could improve campus-based services to better support AI/AN undergraduates. Tinto's integration-commitment model of attrition was utilized as a conceptual frame, and data was collected using four different methodologies. This study found that financial difficulties and family obligations, and how these two themes interact in the context of AI/AN cultural self-identity are critical issues affecting AI/AN undergraduate persistence. Findings are used to elaborate and more fully develop Tinto's model in its application to AI/AN undergraduate persistence in predominantly White institutions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeilC.ReisenC., & ZeaC. (1999). A longitudinal study of the effects of academic and social integration and commitment on retention. NASPA Journal37, 376–385.
2.
BraxtonJ. M.SullivanA. V., & JohnsonR. M. (1997). Appraising Tinto's theory of college student departure. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XII, pp. 107–164). New York: Agathon Press.
3.
BrownE.LeeJ.HunterP., & DonlanW. (2006, July). A report on increasing the retention rate of American Indian undergraduates at Arizona State University. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona State University.
4.
BrownL. L., & KurpiusRobinson S. E. (1997). Psychosocial factors influencing academic persistence of American Indian college students. Journal of College Student Development, 38(1), 3–12.
5.
CaldwellJ. Y.DavisJ. D.Du BoisB.Echo-HawkH.EricksonJ. S.GoinsR. T. (2005). Culturally competent research with American Indians and Alaska Natives. American Indian & Alaska Native Mental Health Research: The Journal of the National Center, 12(1), 1–21.
6.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange (CSRDE). (2006). 2005–06 CSRDE retention report. Norman, OK: Author.
8.
Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange (CSRDE). (2007). 2006–07 CSRDE retention report. Norman, OK: Author.
9.
EngstromC., & TintoV. (2008). Access without support is not opportunity. Change, 40, 46–50.
10.
GlaserB., & StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
11.
GonzalezK. P. (2000). Toward a theory of minority student participation in predominantly white colleges and universities. Journal of College Student Retention, 2(1), 69–91.
12.
GonzalezK. P. (2002). Campus culture and the experiences of Chicano students in predominantly White college and universities. Urban Education, 37(2), 193–218.
13.
GuiffridaD. (2003). African American student organizations as agents of social integration. Journal of College Student Development, 44(3), 304–319.
14.
HeavyRunnerI., & DeCellesR. (2002). Family education model: Meeting the student retention challenge. Journal of American Education, 41(2), 29–37.
15.
HooverJ., & JacobsC. (1992). A survey of American Indian college students: Perceptions toward their study skills/college life. Journal of American Indian Education, 32(1), 21–29.
16.
HorseP. G. (2005). Native American identity. New Directions for Student Services, 109, 61–68.
17.
HouseJ. (1998). High school achievement and admissions test scores as predictors of course performance of Native American and Alaska Native students. Journal of Psychology, 132(6), 680–682.
18.
HuffmanT. (2001). Resistance theory and the transculturation hypothesis as explanations of college attrition and persistence among culturally traditional American Indian students. Journal of American Indian Education, 40(1), 1–23.
19.
HuffmanT. (2003). A comparison of personal assessments of the college experience among reservation and non-reservation American Indian students. Journal of American Indian Education, 42(2), 1–16.
20.
KerrB.ColangeloN.MaxeyJ., & ChristensenP. (1992). Characteristics of academically talented minority students. Journal of Counseling and Development, 70, 606–609.
21.
KnappL. G.Kelly-ReidJ. E.WhitmoreR. W.WuS.HuhS.LevineB. (2005). Enrollment in postsecondary institutions, fall 2002 and financial statistics, fiscal year 2002, (NCES 2005–168). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
22.
LarimoreJ. A., & McClellanG. S. (2005). Native American student retention in U.S. postsecondary education. New Directions for Student Services, 109, 17–32.
23.
LincolnY. S., & GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24.
LoweJ. (2002). Balance and harmony through connectedness: The intentionality of Native American nurses. Holistic Nursing Practice, 16(4), 4–11.
25.
NagdaB. A.GregermanS. R.JonidesJ.HippelW., & LernerJ. S. (1998). Undergraduate students-faculty research partnerships affect retention. Review of Higher Education, 22(1), 55–72.
26.
OgunwoleS. U. (2006). We the people: American Indians and Alaska Natives in the United States. Census 2000 special report, CENSR-28. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
PavelD. M.SkinnerR.FarrisE.CahalanM.TippeconnicJ., & SteinW. (1998). American Indians and Alaska Natives in postsecondary education (NCES 98–291). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
29.
PichetteE. F.GarrettM. T.KosciulekJ. F., & RosenthalD. A. (1999). Cultural identification of American Indians and its impact on rehabilitation services. Journal of Rehabilitation, 65(3), 3–11.
30.
ShwederR., & BourneE. J. (1982). Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally? In MarsellaA. J. & WhiteG. M. (Eds.), Cultural conceptions of mental health and therapy (pp. 97–137). London: Reidel.
31.
SeidmanA. (2005). Minority student retention: Resources for practitioners. New Directions for Institutional Research, 125, 7–24.
32.
SmedleyB. D.MyersH. F., & HarrellS. P. (1993). Minority status stress and the college adjustment of ethnic minority freshmen. Journal of Higher Education, 64(4), 434–452.
33.
StewartG. L.RussellR. B., & WrightD. (1997). The comprehensive role of student affairs in African American student retention. Journal of College Admission, 154, 6–11.
34.
TerenziniP.SpringerL.YaegerP.PascarellaE., & NoraA. (1996). First-generation college students: Characteristics, experiences, and cognitive development. Research in Higher Education, 37(1), 1–22.
35.
TierneyW. G. (1992a). Official encouragement, institutional discouragement: Minorities in academe—The Native American experience. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
36.
TierneyW. G. (1992b). An anthropological analysis of student participation in college. The Journal of Higher Education, 63(6), 603–618.
37.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38.
TintoV. (2003). Learning better together: The impact of learning communities on student success. Higher Education Monograph Series. New York: Syracuse University.
39.
TintoV. (2006). Research and practice of student retention: What next?Journal of College Student Retention8(1), 1–19.
