Recent trends in the financing of higher education have increased the urgency of understanding how financial aid affects degree attainment among college students. Specifically, increased reliance on loans in the composition of financial aid packages renders it critical for policymakers and institutional leaders to understand the impact of borrowing on degree attainment. This study was aimed at understanding the complex relationship between loan amounts and degree completion using path modeling techniques. Results reveal that the process by which loans influence attainment is complex and varies across racial groups. The direct effect of loans on degree attainment was positive for Black students and negative for their Asian, Latina/o, and White counterparts. That direct effect was strongest for Latina/o students. Loan amounts also exhibited several indirect influences on attainment, via their effects on various mediating variables, among all four groups. Implications for research, policy, and practice are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelmanC. C. (1999). Answers in the toolbox. Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor's degree attainment. Washington, DC: National Institute of Post-secondary Education, Libraries, and Lifelong Learning.
2.
BaumS. & PayeaK. (2005). Education pays, 2004: The benefits of higher education for individuals and society. New York: The College Board.
3.
BaumS. & SteeleP. (2007). Trends in student aid, 2007. New York: The College Board.
4.
BeanJ. P. (1980). Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition. Research in Higher Education, 12, 155–187.
5.
BeanJ. P. (1982a). Conceptual models of student attrition: How theory can help the institutional researcher. In PascarellaE. T. (Ed.), Studying student attrition (pp. 17–33). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
BeanJ. P. (1982b). Student attrition, intentions, and confidence: Interaction effects in a path model. Research in Higher Education, 17(4), 291–319.
7.
BeckerG. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York: Columbia University Press.
8.
BerknerL.HeS. & CataldiE. F. (2002). Descriptive summary of 1995–96 beginning postsecondary students: Six years later. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
9.
BollenK. A. & StineR. A. (1993). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. In BollenK. A. & LongJ. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 111–135). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
10.
BowenH. R. (1977). Investing in learning: The individual and social value of American higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
CabreraA. F.NoraA. & CastanedaM. B. (1992). The role of finances in the persistence process: A structural model. Research in Higher Education33(5): 571–593.
12.
CabreraA. F.NoraA. & CastanedaM. B. (1993). College persistence: Structural equations modeling test of an integrated model of student retention. Journal of Higher Education, 64(2), 123–139.
13.
CabreraA. F.StampenJ. O. & HansenW. L. (1990). Exploring the effects of ability to pay on persistence in college. Review of Higher Education, 13(3), 303–336.
14.
ChoyS. P. (2004). Paying for college: Changes between 1990 and 2000 for full-time dependent undergraduates (NCES 2004–075). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
15.
ChoyS. P. & CarrollC. D. (2005). A comparison of 1992–93 and 1999–2000 bachelor's degree recipients a year after graduating. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
16.
ClotfelterC. T. (1991). Economic challenges in higher education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
CoferJ. (2000). A comparison of the influence of debtload on the persistence of students at public and private colleges. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 30(2), 30–58.
18.
CoferJ. & SomersP. (2000). Within-year persistence of students at two-year colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 24, 785–807.
19.
College Board. (2007). Trends in student aid, 2009. New York: Author.
20.
Cuccaro-AlaminS. & ChoyS. P. (1998). Postsecondary financing strategies: How undergraduates combine work, borrowing, and attendance. Statistical analysis report. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
21.
DesJardinsS. L.AhlburgD. A. & McCallB. P. (2002). A temporal investigation of factors related to timely degree completion. Journal of Higher Education, 73(5), 555–581.
22.
DowdA. C. & CouryT. (2006). The effects of loans on persistence and attainment of community college students. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 33–62.
23.
EhrenbergR. (1991). The demographic distribution of American doctorates. In ClotfelterC.EhrenbergR.GetzM. & SiegfriedJ. (Eds.), Economic challenges in higher education (pp. 211–232). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
24.
HellerD. E. (2003). Informing public policy: Financial aid and student persistence: Boulder, CO: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education.
25.
HuL. T. & BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
26.
HuS. & St. JohnE. P. (2001). Student persistence in a public higher education system: Understanding racial and ethnic differences. Journal of Higher Education, 72(3), 265–286.
27.
IshitaniT. T. & DesJardinsS. L. (2002, June 2–5). A longitudinal investigation of dropout from college in the United States. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, Toronto, Ontario.
28.
KaltenbaughL. S.St. JohnE. P. & StarkeyJ. B. (1999). What differences does tuition make? An analysis of ethnic differences in persistence. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 29(2), 21–31.
29.
KellyP. J. (2005). As America becomes more diverse: The impact of state higher education inequality. Boulder, CO: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
30.
KingJ. E. (2002). Crucial choices: How students' financial decisions affect their academic success. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
31.
KingT. & BannonE. (2002). The burden of borrowing: A report on the rising rates of student debt. Washington, DC: State PIRG's Higher Education Project.
32.
KlineR. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
33.
KupekE. (2005). Log-linear transformation of binary variables: A suitable input for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(1), 28–40.
34.
MolineA. E. (1987) Financial aid and student persistence: An application of causal modeling. Research in Higher Education, 26(2): 130–147.
35.
MuseusS. D. & KiangP. N. (2009). The model minority myth and how it contributes to the invisible minority reality in higher education research. In MuseusS. D. (Ed.), Conducting research on Asian Americans in higher education: New directions for institutional research (no. 142, pp. 5–15). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36.
NoraA. (1990). Campus-based programs as determinants of retention among Chicano college students. Journal of Higher Education, 61(3): 312–331.
37.
PascarellaE. T. & TerenziniP. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
38.
PaulsenM. & St. JohnE. (2002). Social class and college costs: Examining the financial nexus between college choice and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 73(2), 189–236.
39.
PaulsenM. B. & St. JohnE. P. (1997). The financial nexus between college choice and persistence. New Directions for Institutional Research, 24(3), 65–82.
40.
PernaL. (1997). The contribution of financial aid to undergraduate persistence. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Albuquerque, NM.
41.
SandlerM. E. (2001). Perceived stress and an elaborated structural model of adult student persistence: An examination of financial aid, financial satisfaction, intent to persist and persistence. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
42.
St. JohnE. P. (1990). Price response in persistence decisions: An analysis of the High School and Beyond cohort. Research in Higher Education, 31(4), 387–403.
43.
St. JohnE. P. (1991). A framework for reexamining state resource-management strategies in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 62(3), 263–287.
44.
St. JohnE. P. (2003). Refinancing the college dream: Access, equal opportunity, and justice for taxpayers. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
45.
St. JohnE. P.CabreraA. F.NoraA. & AskerE. H. (2000). Economic influences on persistence reconsidered: How can finance research inform the reconceptualization of persistence models?Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
46.
St. JohnE. P.HuS. & WeberJ. (2001). State policy and the affordability of public higher education: The influence of state grants on persistence in Indiana. Research in Higher Education, 42(4), 401–428.
47.
St. JohnE. P.KirshteinR. J. & NoellJ. (2004). The effects of student financial aid on persistence: A sequential analysis. The Review of Higher Education, 14(3), 386–406.
48.
St. JohnE. P. & NoellJ. (1989). An alternative to net price: Assessing the influence of price and subsidies on within-year persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 66(2), 156–186.
49.
St. JohnE. P.PaulsenM. B. & StarkeyJ. B. (1996). The nexus between college choice and persistence. Research in Higher Education, 37(2), 175–220.
50.
St. JohnE. P. & StarkeyJ. B. (1995). An alternative to net price: Assessing the influence of prices and subsidies on within-year persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 66(2), 156–186.
51.
SomersP.CoferJ.HallM. & PuttonVander J. (1999). A comparison of the persistence of African American and White students using NPSAS: 96. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, San Antonio, Texas.
52.
SwailW. S.ReddK. & PernaL. W. (2003). Retaining minority students in higher education: A framework for success. ASHE-ERIC Report, 30(2). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
53.
TintoV. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.
54.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
55.
WeiC. C. & CarrollC. D. (2004). A decade of undergraduate student aid: 1989–90 to 1999–2000. National Center for Education Statistics: Washington, DC.
56.
WeiC. C. & HornL. (2002). Persistence and attainment of beginning students with Pell Grants. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
57.
WitkowskyK. (2002). Debating student debt. National Crosstalk, pp. 1, 8–9.
