The high attrition rate from doctoral programs has been called a “hidden crisis” in graduate education (Lovitts & Nelson, 2000). Previous research has identified a constellation of factors that may contribute to doctoral attrition. However, the literature suggests that one of the most powerful influences on doctoral persistence is the relationship doctoral students develop with their advisors (Berg & Ferber, 1983; Ferrer de Valero, 2001; Girves & Wemmerus, 1988). Although there is a growing body of literature that has explored the advisor-advisee relationship with respect to persistence, little attention has been given to the examination of the expectations that advisors have of their advisees and how these expectations might impact degree completion. Therefore, this exploratory qualitative study examined the expectations that 25 exemplary advisors have of their doctoral advisees. Findings revealed 5 specific expectations advisors hold that, if met, could lead to improved doctoral student retention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AustinA. E. (2002a). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to academic career. Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94–122.
2.
AustinA. E. (2002b). Creating a bridge to the future: Preparing new faculty to face changing expectations in a shifting context. The Review of Higher Education, 26(2), 119–144.
3.
BairdL. L. (1995). Helping graduate students: A graduate adviser's view. In Pruitt-LoganA. S. & IsaacP. D. (Eds.), Student services for the changing graduate student population. New directions for student services, no.72 (pp. 25–32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
BargarR. R. & Mayo-ChamberlainJ. (1983). Advisor and advisee issues in doctoral education. The Journal of Higher Education, 54, 407–432.
5.
BenaquistoL. (2000). Graduate supervision: Learning from experience. McGill Journal of Education, 35(1), 69–82.
6.
BergH. M. & FerberM. A. (1983). Men and women graduate students: Who succeeds and why?Journal of Higher Education, 54(6), 629–648.
7.
BiglanA. (1973a). The characteristics of subject matter in different scientific areasJournal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203.
8.
BiglanA. (1973b). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 204–213.
9.
BowenW. G. & RudenstineN. L. (1992). In pursuit of the Ph.D.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
BraggA. K. (1976). The socialization process in higher education. Washington, DC: The American Association of Higher Education.
ChapmanV. & SorkT. (2001). Confessing regulation or telling secrets? Opening up the conversation on graduate supervision, Adult Education Quarterly, 51(2), 94–107.
13.
CheathamH. E. & PhelpsC. E. (1995). Promoting the development of graduate students of color. In PruittA. S. & IsaacP. D. (Eds.), Student services for the changing graduate student population. New Directions for Student Services, no. 72 (pp. 91–99).
14.
CreswellJ. W. & MillerD. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–131.
15.
CrottyM. (2003). The foundations of social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
de ValeroFerrer Y. (2001). Departmental factors effecting time-to-degree and completion rates of doctoral students at one land grant research institution. Journal of Higher Education, 72(3), 341–367.
17.
GardnerS. K. & BarnesB. J. (2007). Graduate student involvement: Socialization for the professional role. Journal of College Student Development, 48(4), 369–387.
18.
GlassC. R.ArnkoffD. B. & ShapiroS. J. (2001). Expectations and preferences. Psychotherapy, 38(4), 455–461.
19.
GirvesJ. E. & WemmerusV. (1988). Developing models of graduate student degree progress. Journal of Higher Education, 59(2), 163–189.
20.
GoldeC. M. (1998). Beginning graduate school: Explaining first-year doctoral attrition. In AndersonM. S. (Ed.) The experience of being in graduate school: An exploration. New directions for higher education, No. 101 (pp. 55–64). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
21.
GoldeC. M. (2000). Should I stay or should I go? Student descriptions of the doctoral attrition process. The Review of Higher Education, 23(2), 199–227.
22.
GoldeC. M. (2005). The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: Lessons from four departments. Journal of Higher Education, 76(6), 669–700.
23.
GubaE. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29(2), 75–91.
24.
HartnettR. T. & KatzJ. (1977). The Education of Graduate Students. Journal of Higher Education, 48(6), 646–664.
25.
HerzigA. H. (2002). Where have all the students gone? Participation of doctoral students in authentic mathematical activity as a necessary condition for persistence toward the Ph.D.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50, 177–212.
26.
HincheyP. & KimmelI. (2000). The graduate grind: A critical look at graduate education. New York, NY: Falmer Press.
27.
HirtJ. B. & MuffoJ. A. (1998). Graduate students: Institutional climates and disciplinary cultures. In BauerK. W. (Ed.) Campus climate. New directions for institutional research, no. 98 (pp. 17–33). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28.
HollandJ. W. (1998). Mentoring and the faculty development of African-American doctoral students. In FriersonH. T.Jr. (ed.). Diversity in Higher Education, Volume 2 (pp. 17–40). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
29.
HyunJ. K.QuinnB. C.MadonT & LustigS. (2006). Graduate student mental health: Needs assessment and utilization of counseling services. Journal of College Student Development, 47(3), 247–266.
30.
JacksP.ChubinD. E.PorterA. L. & ConnollyT. (1983). The ABCs of ABDs: A study of incomplete doctorates. Improving College and University Teaching, 31, 74–81.
31.
KlomparensK. L. & BeckJ. P. (2004). Michigan's State University's conflict resolution program: Setting expectations and resolving conflicts. In WulffD. H. & AustinA. E. (Eds.). Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty. (pp. 250–263). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
32.
KnoxS.SchlosserL. Z.PruittN. T. & HillC. E. (2006). A qualitative examination of graduate advising relationships: The advisor perspective. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(4), 489–518.
33.
LovittsB. E. (2001). Leaving the Ivory Tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
34.
LovittsB. E. (2008). The transition to independent research: Who makes it, who doesn't, and why. Journal of Higher Education, 79, 296–325.
35.
LovittsB. E. & NelsonC. (2000). The hidden crisis in graduate education: Attrition from Ph.D. programs. Academe, 86(6), 44–50.
36.
LyonsW.ScrogginsD. & RuleP. B. (1990) The mentor in graduate education. Studies in Higher Education, 1(3), 277–285.
37.
McLureJ. E. B. (1989) Recommendations for faculty advising. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgia State University—College of Education, United States—Georgia. Retrieved September 16, 2004, from Dissertations & Theses: A&I database. (Publication No. AAT 8922915).
38.
MinorJ. T. (2003). For better or worse. Improving advising relationship between faculty and graduate students. In GreenA. L. & ScottL. V. (Eds.), Journey to the Ph.D. How to navigate the process as African Americans (pp. 239–253). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publication.
39.
NettlesM. T. & MillettC. M. (2006). Three magic letters: Getting to Ph.D.Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
40.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41.
PhillipsE. M. & PughD. S. (2000). How to get a Ph.D.: A handbook for students and their supervisors (3rd Ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
42.
PoleC. J.SprokkereefA.BurgessR. G. & LakinE. (1997). Supervision of doctoral students in the natural sciences: Expectations and experiences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(1), 49–63.
43.
SchlosserL. Z.KnoxS.MoskovitzA. R. & HillC. E. (2003). A qualitative examination of graduate advising relationships: The advisee perspective. Journal of counseling psychology, 50(2), 178–188.
44.
SchneiderA. (1998). Harvard faces the aftermath of a graduate student suicide. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 45(9), A12.
45.
SorensonG. & KaganD. (1967). Conflicts between doctoral candidates and their sponsors: A contrast in expectations. Journal of Higher Education, 38(1), 17–24.
46.
StraussA. & CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative Research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48.
WeidmanJ. C.TwaleD. J. & SteinE. L. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage?Ashe-Eric Higher Education Report, 28(3). Washington, DC: The George Washington University School of Education and Human Development.
49.
WinstonR. B. & PolkosnikM. C. (1984). Advising in graduate and professional school. In WinstonR. B.Jr.MillerT. K.EnderS. C. & CritesT. J. (Eds.), Developmental Academic Advising (pp. 287–316). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
50.
WrenchJ. S. & PunyanuntN. M. (2004). Advisee-advisor communication: An exploratory study examining interpersonal communication variables in the graduate advisee-advisor relationship. Communication quarterly, 52(3), 224–236.
51.
YoungA. M. & PerreweP. L. (2000). What did you expect? An examination of career-related support and social support among mentors and protégés. Journal of Management, 26(4), 611–632.
52.
YoungA. M. & PerreweP. L. (2004). The role of expectations in the mentoring exchange: An analysis of mentor and protégé expectations in relation to perceived support. Journal of Management Issues, 16(1), 103–126.
