In many Western welfare jurisdictions, publicly provided home care is being eroded and its provision increasingly individualized. These shifts are of a particular significance for older women, a group for whom supportive home care has been an important buttress against the social and physical jeopardies of old age. A longitudinal, qualitative study of such women in Ontario, Canada, spanned the implementation of managed competition in home care and a period of rapid privatization and service rationing. Study participants experienced cuts and, stemming from increasingly precarious employment conditions in the home care workforce, inconsistent care providers. These changes generated distress, insecurity, and isolation in participants' lives. This article explores how their complaints about insufficient care were silenced: by fear, hopelessness, and the cultural injunction to put a stoic and selfless face on the limitations of old age. Their accounts reveal how large material and discursive shifts and state restructuring come to penetrate identity, feeling, and speech. This examination of the silencing of complaint at home care's front lines reveals the cumulative effects of rationing; it also illuminates how, if heard, service users' voices can inform collective struggles to resist the degradation of home care and reposition older people in relation to the state.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ClarkJ.Preventive home visits to elderly people: Their effectiveness cannot be judged by randomized control trials. BMJ323:708, 2001.
2.
DalleyG.Defining Difference: Health and Social Care for Older People in the 1990s. Centre for Policy on Ageing, London, 1998.
3.
ThorslundM.BergmarkA.ParkerM. G.Difficult decisions on care and services for elderly people: The dilemma of setting priorities in the welfare state. Scand. J. Soc. Welfare6:197–206, 1997.
4.
EstesC. L.PhillipsonC.The globalization of capital, the welfare state, and old age policy. Int. J. Health Serv. 32:279–297, 2002.
5.
AronsonJ.NeysmithS. M.Manufacturing social exclusion in the home care market. Can. Public Policy17(2):151–166, 2001.
6.
BiggsS.Toward critical narrativity: Stories of aging in contemporary social policy. J. Aging Stud. 15:303–316, 2001.
7.
DrewP.HoltE.Complainable matters: The use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints. Soc. Prob.35:398–417, 1988.
8.
NeysmithS. M.From home care to social care. In Women's Caring: Feminist Perspectives on Social Welfare, ed. BainesC. T.Oxford University Press, Toronto, 1998.
9.
MacAdamM.Home care: It's time for a Canadian model. Healthcare Papers1(4):9–36, 2000.
10.
NeysmithS. M.AronsonJ.Working conditions in home care: Negotiating race and class boundaries in gendered work. Int. J. Health Serv. 27:479–499, 1997.
11.
LightD. W.Cost containment and the backdraft of competition policies. Int. J. Health Serv. 31:681–708, 2001.
12.
WilliamsA. P.Long-term care goes to market: Managed competition and Ontario's reform of community-based services. Can. J. Aging18:125–153, 1999.
13.
AndersonM.ParentK.Putting a Face on Home Care: CARP's Report on Home Care in Canada. Queen's University Health Policy Research Unit, Kingston, Ont.1999.
14.
Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. Without Foundation: How Medicare Is Undermined by Gaps and Privatization in Community and Continuing Care. Vancouver, 2000.
15.
Canadian Pensioners Concerned, Ontario Division. Position Statement on Privatization in Health Care. Toronto, 1998.
16.
Care Watch. Behind Closed Doors: Home Care Stories from the Community. Toronto, 1999.
17.
MeadeE.Will the public be consulted about the new long-term care act?Older Women's Network Contact12(3):5, 2000.
18.
Canadian Union of Public Employees. Who's Pushing Privatization? Ottawa, 2000.
19.
Ontario Health Coalition. Long-Term Care: In Limbo or Worse?Toronto, 2001.
20.
CroftS.BeresfordP.From Paternalism to Participation: Involving People in Social Services. Joseph Rowntree, Bristol, U.K., 1990.
21.
JackR. (ed.). Empowerment in Community Care. Chapman and Hall, London, 1995.
Preston-ShootM.A triumph of hope over experience? Modernizing accountability: The case of complaints procedures in community care. Soc. Policy Admin. 35(6):701–715, 2001.
24.
StricklinM. L.Home care consumers speak out on quality. Home Health Care Nurse11(6):10–17, 1993.
25.
ReedR.GilleardC.Elderly patients' satisfaction with a community nursing service. In Community Care Asking the User, ed. WilsonG., Chapman and Hall, London, 1995.
26.
SamuelssonG.The quality of health care services in Sweden: Consumer expectations and changing satisfaction. In Care Services for Later Life: Transformations and Critiques, ed. WarnesA. M.Jessica Kingsley, London, 2000.
27.
WilsonG.Low expectations reinforced: Experiences of health services in advanced old age. In Community Care Asking the User, ed. WilsonG., Chapman and Hall, London, 1995.
28.
LittlewoodP.HerkommerS.Identifying social exclusion: Some problems of meaning. In Social Exclusion in Europe: Problems and Paradigms, ed. LittlewoodP., Ashgate, Aldershot, U.K., 1999.
WilkinsK.ParkE.Home care in Canada. Health Rep. 10(1):29–37, 1998.
31.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G.Naturalistic Enquiry. Sage, Newbury Park, U.K., 1985.
32.
AronsonJ.Elderly people's accounts of home care rationing: Missing voices in long-term care policy debates. Ageing Society22:399–418, 2002.
33.
ScottJ. C.Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1985.
34.
TwiggJ.Bathing: The Body and Community Care. Routledge, London, 2000.
35.
CoyleJ.Exploring the meaning of “dissatisfaction” with health care: The importance of “personal identity threat.”Sociol. Health Illness21(1):95–124, 1999.
36.
SindingC.Care's Ultimate Limits: Experiences and Accounts of Caring for a Relative or Friend Who Died of Breast Cancer. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto, 2002.
37.
BaldockJ.Social care in old age: More than a funding problem. Soc. Policy Admin. 31:73–89, 1997.
38.
BartkyS. L.Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. Routledge, New York, 1990.
39.
DavisA.EllisK.Enforced altruism in community care. In Ethical Issues in Social Work, ed. HugmanR.SmithD., Routledge, London, 1995.
40.
LightD. W.HughesD.Introduction: A sociological perspective on rationing: Power, rhetoric and situated practices. Sociol. Health Illness23(5):551–569, 2001.
41.
KatzS.Busy bodies: Activity, aging, and the management of everyday life. J. Aging Stud. 4:135–152, 2000.
42.
Tulle-WintonE.Growing old and resistance: Towards a new cultural economy of old age?Ageing Society19:281–299, 1999.
43.
MorrisJ.Independent Lives: Community Care and Disabled People. Macmillan, London, 1993.
44.
TannerD.Partnership in prevention: Messages from older people. In Developing Good Practice, ed. WhiteV.HarrisJ., Jessica Kingsley, London, 2001.
45.
AronsonJ.SindingC.Home care users' experiences of fiscal constraints: Challenges and opportunities for case management. Care Manage. J.2(4):1–6, 2000.
PriestleyM.Dropping E's: The missing link in quality assurance for disabled people. Crit. Soc. Policy44/45:7–21, 1995.
48.
MulcahyL.TritterJ. Q.Pathways, pyramids and icebergs: Mapping the links between dissatisfaction and complaints. Sociol. Health Illness20(6):825–847, 1998.
49.
BeardwoodB.Complaints against nurses: A reflection of “the new managerialism” and consumerism in health care?Soc. Sci. Med.48:363–374, 1999.
50.
DeanH.Who's complaining? Redress and social policy. In Social Policy Review 8, ed. MayM.Social Policy Association, London, 1996.
