Pluralistic differs from redistributive policymaking in terms of narrow interests or groups, low level conflict decisions, covert modes of communication, and technical recommendations free from value choices. The impact of pluralistic policymaking centers primarily on control or deterrence strategies. The drug problem does not exist in isolation. It exists as a cluster of problems affecting broad interests or groups. The issues are re distributive in the sense that everything relates to everything else. It seems apparent that a cluster of policies and programs need development as well as genuine citizen participation in the formulation of these policies and programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CampbellRonald F.CunninghamLuvern L., and McPheeRoderick F.The Organization and Control of American Schools (Charles E. Merrill Books, Inc., 1965), Columbus, Ohio.
2.
PetersonPaul E.“The School Busing Controversy: Redistributive or Pluralist Politics?”Administrator's Notebook, Midwest Administration Center, Vol. XX, May, 1972, No. 9, University of Chicago.
3.
National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse Report (1973), Kansas City Star, Vol. 93, No. 186 (March 22): 1.
4.
MoynihanDaniel P.Toward a National Urban Policy: Metropolis in Crisis. Edited by HaddenJeffrey K.MasottiLouis H., and LarsonCalvin J. HascaIII., F. E. Peacock, Inc., 1971, p. 454.
5.
SniderArthur J.“Prof: Public Role Grows in Medicine,”Chicago Daily News, September 17, 1971, p. 28.
6.
StajnfeldRosa and LevineDaniel U.“A Review of the Literature on Citizen Participation in Improving Urban Communities,”Center for the Study of Metropolitan Problems in Education, University of Missouri-Kansas City, September, 1971, pp. 6–9.
7.
ForresterJay. “The Counter-intuitive Character of Social Systems,”The Futurist, Vol. V, No. 4, August, 1971, p. 153.
