Students in an introductory computing class participated in a study investigating the impact of using a graphics programming environment (Alice) and pair-programming on confidence, enjoyment and achievement. Sixty-four participants completed a short questionnaire and a content pre-test about computer programming concepts. Students were then assigned to one of two groups: individual or paired. The pairs completed a tutorial on Alice and then completed a short assignment over a period of one week working as a team of two. The individuals completed the same tutorial and assignment but completed it alone. Lastly, all participants took the same questionnaire and content post-test. The results showed that all students experienced increased confidence in programming, that students in pairs enjoyed programming more than students who worked individually, and that all students performed significantly better on the content post-test.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CliburnD. (2003). Experiences with pair programming at a small college. Journal of Computing in Small Colleges, 19(1), 20–29.
2.
CooperS.DannW., & PauschR. (2000a). Alice, a 3-D tool for introductory programming concepts. Proceedings of the 5th annual CCSC northeastern conference. Journal of Computing in Small Colleges, 15(5), 107–116.
3.
CooperS.DannW., & PauschR. (2000b). Developing algorithmic thinking with Alice. The Proceedings of ISECON 2000, 17, 506–539.
4.
CooperS.DannW., & PauschR. (2003). Teaching objects-first in introductory computer science. Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 35(1), 191–195.
5.
DannW.CooperS., & PauschR. (2001). Using visualization to teach novices recursion. Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Innovation in Computer Science Education, 33(3), 109–112.
6.
DannW.DragonT.CooperS.DietzlerK.RyanK., & PauschR. (2003). Objects: Visualization of behavior and state. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 35(3), 84–88.
7.
DeClueT. (2003). Pair programming and pair trading: Effects on learning and motivation in a CS2 course. Journal of Computing in Small Colleges, 18(5), 49–56.
8.
GrossP., & PowersK. (2005). Evaluating Assessments of Novice Programming Environments. International Computing Education Research Workshop (ICER 2005), 99–110.
9.
HanksB.McDowellC.DraperD., & KrnjajicM. (2004). Program quality with pair programming in CS1. Proceedings of the 9th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE 2004), 176–180.
10.
HedinG.BendixL., & MagnussonB. (2003). Introducing software engineering by means of extreme programming. ICSE 2003: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 586–593.
11.
HulkkoH., & AbrahamssonP. (2005). A multiple case study on the impact of pair programming on product quality. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, 495–504.
12.
KelleherC., & PauschR. (2005). Stencils-based tutorials: Design and evaluation. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 541–550.
13.
LawA., & CharronR. (2005). Effects of agile practices on social factors. HSSE '05: Proceedings of the 2005 Workshop on Human and Social Factors of Software Engineering, 1–5.
14.
LeJeuneN. (2006). Teaching software engineering practices with extreme programming. Journal of Computing in Small Colleges, 21(3), 107–117.
15.
McDowellC.WernerL.BullockH., & FernaldJ. (2002). The effects of pair-programming on performance in an introductory programming course. Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 38–42.
16.
McDowellC.WernerL.BullockH., & FernaldJ. (2003). The impact of pair programming on student performance, perception and persistence. ICSE 2003: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering, 602–607.
17.
MelnikG., & MaurerF. (2005). A cross-program investigation of students' perceptions of agile methods. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, 481–488.
18.
MendesE.Al-FakhriL. B., & Luxton-ReillyA. (2005). Investigating pair-programming in a 2nd-year software development and design computer science course. Proceedings of the 10th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 296–300.
19.
MoskelB.LurieD., & CooperS. (2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of a new instructional approach. Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 75–79.
20.
NagappanN.WilliamsL.FerzliM.WiebeE.YangK.MillerC. (2003). Improving the CS1 experience with pair programming. Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 359–362.
21.
PauschR.BurnetteT.CapeheartA. C.ConwayM.CosgroveD.DeLineR.DurbinJ.GossweilerR.KogaS., & WhiteJ. (1995). Alice: Rapid prototyping system for virtual reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 84–88.
22.
PrestonD. (2005). Pair programming as a model of collaborative learning: A review of the research. Journal of Computing in Small Colleges, 20(4), 39–45.
23.
RodgerS. H. (2002). Introducing computer science through animation and virtual worlds. Proceedings of the 2nd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 186–190.
24.
SharpH., & RobinsonH. (2005). Some social factors of software engineering: The maverick, community and technical practices. Proceedings of the 2005 Workshop on Human and Social Factors of Software Engineering, 1–6.
25.
ThomasL.RatcliffeM., & RobertsonA. (2003). Code warriors and code-a-phobes: A study in attitude and pair programming. Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 363–367.
26.
VanDeGriftT. (2004). Coupling pair programming and writing: Learning about students' perceptions and processes. Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2–6.
27.
WaiteW.JacksonM., & LeonardiP. (2004). Student culture vs. group work in computer science. SIGCSE '04: Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 12–16.
28.
WilliamsL., & KesslerR. (2000). All I really need to know about pair programming I learned in kindergarten. Communications of the ACM, 43(4), 108–114.
29.
WilliamsL., & UpchurchR. L. (2001). In support of student pair-programming. Proceedings of the thirty-second SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 327–331.
