Validation of the Business Computer Self-Efficacy Scale: Assessment of the Computer Literacy of Incoming Business Students

Abstract

The business computer self-efficacy (BCSE) scale is potentially an important tool for researchers studying business students and professionals, but it needs to be validated for use. Content validity was established by Stephens and Shotick (2002). This research analyzes the scale under both criterion-related and construct validation. The scale is compared to a similar scale that has already been validated through research (Murphy, Coover & Owen, 1989). Intercorrelational patterns are examined among these two scales designed to measure the same construct (computer self-efficacy). The results reveal that the two scales are highly correlated. Additionally, the scale is used to demonstrate that it can be used to choose the appropriate type of computer training. Research theorizes that low computer self efficacy will lead individuals to circumvent experiences with computer technology (Stephens & Shotick, 2002). This article provides evidence that subjects with low computer self-efficacy will avoid interacting with computer technology when given a choice.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agarwal

Sambamurthy

, & Stair

(2000). Research report: The Evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy—An empirical assessment. Information Systems Research, 11, 418–430.

Bandura

(1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.

Burkhardt

, & Brass

(1990). Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 104–127.

Busch

(1995). Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 147–158.

Compeau

, & Higgins

(1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19, 189–211.

Compeau

Higgins

, & Huff

(1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 23, 145–158.

Davis

(1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 318–340.

Gist

, & Mitchell

(1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17, 183–211.

Gist

Schwoerer

, & Rosen

(1989). Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 884–891.

10.

Hill

Smith

, & Mann

(1987). Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 392–414.

11.

Johnson

, & Marakas

(2000). Research report: The role of behavioral modeling in computer skills acquisition: Toward refinement of the model. Information Systems Research, 11, 402–417.

12.

Lee

, & Bobko

(1994). Self-efficacy beliefs: Comparison of five measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 364–369.

13.

Lodge

(1981). Magnitude scaling: Quantitative measurement of opinions. London: Sage Publications.

14.

Marakas

, & Johnson

(1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information Systems Research, 9, 126–163.

15.

McAuley

Wraith

, & Duncan

(1991). Self-efficacy, perceptions of success, and intrinsic motivation for exercise. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 139–155.

16.

McMahon

Gardner

Gray

, & Mulhern

(1999). Barriers to student computer usage: Staff and student perceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15, 302–311.

17.

Murphy

Coover

, & Owen

(1989). Development and validation of the computer self-efficacy scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 893–899.

18.

Sein

Bostrom

, & Olfman

(1987). Training end-users to computers: Cognitive, motivational, and social issues. Information Systems and Operations Research, 25, 236–254.

19.

Stephens

, & Shotick

(2002). Re-evaluation of the computer self-efficacy model: Development and use of the business computer self-efficacy scale. Issues in Information Systems, 3, 251–257.

20.

Taylor

Locke

, & Lee

(1984). Type A behavior and faculty research productivity: What are the mechanisms? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 402–418.

21.

Taylor

, & Todd

(1995). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19, 561–570.