This study assessed the performance of a federal program designed to serve first-generation, low-income (FGLI) college students—the Ronald E. McNair Program. Using data from a midwestern liberal arts university we found that FGLI program participants are far more likely to be retained to the university and successful in terms of timely graduation and placement into graduate school than FGLI non-participants, even when controlling for academic ability and ambition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AttinasiL. C. (1989). Getting in: Mexican Americans' perceptions of university attendance and the implications for freshman year attendance. Journal of Higher Education, 60(2), 247–277.
2.
BillsonJ. M., & TerryM. B. (1982). In search of the silken purse: Factors in attrition among first-generation students. College and University, 58(1), 57–75.
3.
ChaneyB. (1997). Third-year longitudinal study results and program implementation update, national study of student support services. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
4.
ChoyS. P. (2000). Low-income students: Who they are and how they pay for their education. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, NCES 2000–169.
5.
EddinsW.NikolovaS. G.WilliamsD. F.BushekD.PorterD., & KinekeG. (1997). Searching for a prominent role of research in undergraduate education: Project Interface. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 8(1), 69–81.
6.
EmsR. (1997). Fear of success among first-generation college students. M.A.thesis, Truman State University.
7.
HellmanC., & HarbeckD. (1997). Academic self-efficacy: Highlighting the first-generation student. Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, 4(2), 165–169.
8.
JamesP. (1998). Progressive development of deep learning skills through undergraduate and postgraduate dissertations. Educational Studies, 24(2), 95–105.
9.
LondonH. B. (1989). Breaking away: A study of first-generation college students and their families. American Journal of Education, 97(1), 145–170.
10.
McCauleyD. P. (1988). Effects of specific factors on blacks' persistence at a predominantly white university. Journal of College Student Personnel, 29(1), 48–51.
11.
McGregorL. N.MaylebenM. A.BuzzangaV. L.DavisS. F., & BeckerA. H. (1991). Selected personality characteristics of first-generation college students. College Student Journal, 25 (3), 231–234.
12.
MuraskinL. (1997a). “Best practices” in student support services, follow up study of student support services programs. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
13.
MuraskinL. (1997b). A structured freshman year for at-risk students. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
14.
NagdaB. A.GregermanS. R.JonidesJ.von HippelW., & LernerJ. S. (1998). Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affect student retention. Review of Higher Education22(1), 55–72.
15.
NnadozieE.IshiyamaJ., & ChonJ. (2001). Undergraduate research internships and graduate school success. Journal of College Student Development, 42(2), 145–156.
16.
NunezA. M., & Cuccaro-AlamainS. (1998). First-generation students: Undergraduates whose parents never enrolled in post-secondary education. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education NCES 98–082.
17.
PeppasN. A. (1981). Student preparation for graduate school through undergraduate research. Chemical Engineering Education, 15(2), 135–137.
18.
PrattP. A., & SkaggsC. T. (1989). First-generation college students: Are they at greater risk for attrition than their peers. Research in Rural Education, 6(1), 31–34.
19.
Program Monitoring and Information Technology Service Higher Education Programs U.S. Department of Education (1999). Program assessment: Ronald E. McNair Postbaccalaureate Achievement Program. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
20.
RichardsonR. C.Jr., & SkinnerE. F. (1992). Helping first-generation minority students achieve degrees. In ZwerelingL. S. & LondonH. B. (Eds.), First-generation students: Confronting the cultural issues (pp. 29–43). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
21.
SakalysJ. A. (1984). Effects of an undergraduate research course on cognitive development. Nursing Research, 33(3), 290–295.
22.
SkinnerE. F., & RichardsonR. C.Jr. (1989). Making it in a majority university: The minority graduate's perspective. Change, 20(3), 34–42.
23.
StageF. K., & HosslerD. (1989). Differences in family influences on college attendance plans for male and female ninth graders. Research in Higher Education, 30(3), 301–315.
24.
SuitorJ. J. (1987). Mother-daughter relations when married daughters return to school: Effects of status similarity. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49(3), 435–444.
25.
TerenziniP. T.SpringerL.YaegerP. M.PascarellaE. T., & NoraA. (1996). First-generation college students: Characteristics, experiences and cognitive development. Research in Higher Education, 37(1), 1–21.
TingS.-M. R. (1998). Predicting first-year grades and academic progress of college students of first-generation and low-income families. Journal of College Admission, 158(1), 14–28.
28.
TintoV. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.
29.
TintoV. (1987) Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
30.
TintoV. (1998). Colleges as communities: Taking research on student persistence seriously. The Review of Higher Education, 21(2), 167–177.
31.
VolkwienJ. F., & CarboneD. A. (1994). The impact of departmental research and teaching climates on undergraduate growth and satisfaction. The Journal of Higher Education, 65(2), 147–159.
32.
York-AndersonD., & BowmanS. L. (1991). Assessing the college knowledge of first-generation and second-generation college students. Journal of College Student Development, 32(1), 116–122.
