This study examined whether the efficacy of keepin’ it REAL, a model program for substance use prevention in schools, was moderated by gender, ethnicity, and acculturation. Gender differences in program efficacy may arise through boys' higher risk of drug use, inadequate attention to girls' developmental issues, or cultural factors like polarized gender expectations. Data came from a randomized trial in 35 Phoenix, Arizona, middle schools involving 4,622 mostly Latino 7th graders. Using multi-level mixed models and multiple imputation missing techniques, results for the total sample showed no gender differences in program effects on recent substance use, but the program was more effective in fostering boys' than girls' anti-drug norms. Subgroup analyses demonstrated several more beneficial program effects for boys than girls (less alcohol and cigarette use and stronger anti-drug norms), but only among less acculturated Latinos. There were no gender differences in program effects among more acculturated Latinos, nor among non-Latino whites.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlanizM. L.TrenoA. J., & SaltzR. F. (1999). Gender, acculturation, and alcohol consumption among Mexican Americans. Substance Use & Misuse, 34(10), 1407–1426.
2.
AlbertsJ. K.Miller-RassuloM. A., & HechtM. L. (1991). A typology of drug resistance strategies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 19, 129–151.
3.
AllisonP. D. (1977). Testing for interaction in multiple regression. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 144–153.
4.
AllisonP. D. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
5.
BankstonC. L., & CaldasS. J. (1996). Majority Black schools and the perpetuation of social injustice: The influence of de facto segregation on academic achievement. Social Forces, 75(2), 535–555.
6.
BarnesG. E. (1979). Solvent abuse: A review. International Journal of the Addictions, 14, 1–26.
7.
BeauvaisF. (1998). Cultural identification and substance use in North America: An annotated bibliography. Substance Use and Misuse, 33, 1315–1336.
8.
BirmanD.PerskyI.BasuA., & PulleyE. (2004). Acculturation and acculturation gaps in families: Former Soviet and Vietnamese refugee parents and adolescents in the U.S. Presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, Baltimore, MD.
9.
BlakeS. M.AmaroH.SchwartzP. M., & FlinchbaughL. J. (2001). A review of substance abuse prevention interventions for young adolescent girls. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21(3), 294–324.
10.
BotvinG. (2000). Life skills training. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Health Press.
11.
BotvinG. J.GriffinK. W.DiazT., & Ifill-WilliamsM. (2001). Drug abuse prevention among minority adolescents: Post-test and one-year follow-up of a school-based preventive intervention. Prevention Science, 2, 1–13.
12.
BotvinG. J.SchinkeS. P.EpsteinJ. A., & DiazT. (1994). Effectiveness of culturally focused and generic skills training approaches to alcohol and drug abuse prevention among minority youths. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 8(2), 116–127.
13.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and by design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
14.
CaetanoR. (1986). Alternative definitions of Hispanics: Consequences in an alcohol survey. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 8(4), 331–344.
15.
CaetanoR., & ClarkC. L. (2003). Acculturation, alcohol consumption, smoking and drug use among Hispanics. In ChunK. M.OrganistaP. B., & MarinG. (Eds.), Acculturation: advances in theory, measurement and applied research (pp. 222–239). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16.
CastroF. G.ProescholdbellR. J.AbeitaL., & RodriguezD. (1999). Ethnic and cultural minority groups. In McCradyB. S. & EpsteinE. E. (Eds.), Addictions: A comprehensive guidebook (pp. 499–526). New York: Oxford Press.
17.
CastroF. G.BoyerG. R., & BalcazarH. G. (2000). Healthy adjustment in Mexican American and other Hispanic adolescents. In MontemayorR.AdamsG. R., & GullotaT. P. (Eds.), Adolescent diversity in ethnic, economic, and cultural contexts (pp. 141–178). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
CollinsR. L., & McNairL. D. (2002). Minority women and alcohol use. Alcohol Research and Health, 26(4), 251–256.
19.
DakofG. A. (2000). Understanding gender differences in adolescent drug abuse: Issues of comorbidity and family functioning. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 32(1), 25–32.
20.
DaltonM. A.SargentJ. D.BeachM. L.Titus-ErnstoffL.GibsonJ. J.AhernsM.TickleJ. J., & HeathertonT. F. (2003). Effect of viewing smoking in movies on adolescent smoking initiation: A cohort study. Lancet, 362(9380), 281–285.
21.
DuncanS. C.DuncanT. E.BiglanA., & AryD. (1998). Contributions of the social context to the development of adolescent substance use: A multivariate latent growth modeling approach. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 50, 57–71.
22.
EllisR. A.O'HaraM., & SowersK. M. (2000). Profile-based intervention: Developing gender-sensitive treatment for adolescent substance abusers. Research on Social Work Practice, 10(3), 327–347.
23.
EpsteinJ. A.BotvinG. J., & DiazT. (2000). Alcohol use among Hispanic adolescents: Role of linguistic acculturation and gender. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 45(3), 18–32.
24.
EpsteinJ. A.BotvinG. J., & DiazT. (2001). Linguistic acculturation associated with higher marijuana and polydrug use among Hispanic adolescents. Substance Use & Misuse, 6(4), 477–499.
25.
EscobarJ. I. (1998). Immigration and mental health: Why are immigrants better off?Archives of General Psychiatry, 55(9), 781–782
26.
FlanneryD. J.WilliamsL. L., & VazsonyiA. T. (1999). Who are they with and what are they doing? Delinquent behavior, substance use, and early adolescents' after-school time. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 69, 247–253.
27.
FreshmanA., & LeinwandC. (2000). The implications of female risk factors for substance abuse prevention in adolescent girls. In AtwoodJ. D. (Ed.), Family systems/Family therapy: Applications for clinical practice (pp. 29–51). New York: Hawthorn Press.
28.
GerardJ. M., & BuehlerC. (1999). Multiple risk factors in the family environment and youth problem behaviors. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 16, 343–361.
29.
GilA. G.WagnerE. F., & VegaW. A. (2000). Acculturation, familism, and alcohol use among Latino adolescent males: Longitudinal relations. Journal of Community Psychology, 28(4), 443–458.
30.
GilbertM. J., & CollinsR. L. (1997). Ethnic variation in women's and men's drinking. In WilsnackR. W. & WilsnackS. C. (Eds.), Gender and alcohol (pp. 357–378). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies.
31.
GonzalezA. (1982). Sex roles of the traditional Mexican family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13(3), 330–339.
32.
GosinM.MarsigliaF. F., & HechtM. L. (2003). Keepin' it REAL: A drug resistance curriculum tailored to the strengths and needs of pre-adolescents of the Southwest. Journal of Drug Education, 33, 119–142.
33.
GosinM. N.DustmanP. A.DrapeauA. E., & HarthunM. L. (2003). Participatory action research: Creating an effective prevention curriculum for adolescents in the Southwest. Health Education Research: Theory and Practice, 18, 363–379.
34.
GrahamJ. W.RobertsM. M.TattersonJ. W., & JohnstonS. E. (2002). Data quality in evaluation of an alcohol-related harm prevention program. Evaluation Review, 26, 147–189.
35.
GrahamJ. W.FlayB. R.JohnsonC. A.HansenW. B.GrossmanL. M., & SobelJ. L. (1984). Reliability of self-report measures of drug use in prevention research: Evaluation of the Project SMART questionnaire via the test-retest reliability matrix. Journal of Drug Education, 14, 175–193.
36.
GuthrieB. J., & LowL. K. (2000). A substance use prevention framework: Considering the social context for African American girls. Public Health Nursing, 17(5), 363–373.
37.
HansenW. B., & GrahamJ. W. (1991). Preventing alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use among adolescents: Peer pressure resistance training versus establishing conservative norms. Preventive Medicine, 20, 414–430.
38.
HarrisonL. D., & KennedyN. J. (1994). Drug use in the United States Mexico border area: Is there an epidemic waiting to happen?Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 16, 281–295.
39.
HarthunM. L.DrapeauA.DustmanP. A., & MarsigliaF. F. (2002). Implementing a prevention curriculum: An effective researcher-teacher partnership. Education and Urban Society, 34(3), 353–364.
40.
HechtM. L.MarsigliaF. F.ElekE.WagstaffD. A.KulisS.DustmanP., & Miller-DayM. (2003). Culturally grounded substance use prevention: An evaluation of the keepin' it REAL curriculum. Prevention Science, 4(4), 233–248.
41.
HolleranL.DustmanP.ReevesL., & MarsigliaF. F. (2002). Creating culturally grounded videos for substance abuse prevention: A dual perspective on process. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 2(1), 55–78.
42.
JohnsonT. P., & MottJ. A. (2001). The reliability of self-reported age of onset of tobacco, alcohol and illicit drug use. Addiction, 96(8), 1187–1198.
43.
JohnstonL. D.O'MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G., & ShulenbergJ. E. (2006). Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2005. Volume I, Secondary school students (NIH Publication No. 06–5883). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
44.
KauffmanS.SilverP., & PoulinJ. (1997). Gender differences in attitudes toward alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs. Social Work, 42(3), 231–241.
45.
KilbourneJ. (1999). Deadly persuasion: Why women and girls must fight the addictive power of advertising. New York: Free Press.
46.
KranauE. J.GreenV., & Valencia-WeberG. (1982). Acculturation and the Hispanic woman: Attitudes toward women, sex-role attribution, sex-role behavior, and demographics. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Science, 4(1), 21–40.
47.
KulisS.MarsigliaF. F., & HurdleD. (2003). Gender identity, ethnicity, acculturation and drug use: Exploring differences among adolescents in the Southwest. Journal of Community Psychology, 31(2), 1–22.
48.
KulisS.MarsigliaF. F.ElekE.DustmanP.WagstaffD. A., & HechtM. L. (2005). Mexican/Mexican American adolescents and keepin' it REAL: An evidence based substance abuse prevention program. Children & Schools, 27(3), 133–145.
49.
LeCroyC. W. (2004a). Experimental evaluation of the ‘Go Grrrls’ preventive intervention for early adolescent girls. Journal of Primary Prevention, 25, 457–473.
50.
LeCroyC. W. (2004b). The development and evaluation of an empowerment program for early adolescent girls. Adolescence, 39, 427–441.
51.
LeCroyC. W., & DaleyJ. (2001). Empowering adolescent girls: Examining the present and building skills for future with the Go Grrrls Program. New York: W. W. Norton.
52.
LillehojC. J.TrudeauL.SpothR., & WikramaK. A. S. (2004). Internalizing, social competence, and substance initiation: Influence of gender moderation and a preventive intervention. Substance Use & Misuse, 39(6), 963–991.
53.
MarsigliaF. F., & HechtM. L. (2005). Keepin' it REAL: An evidence-based program. Santa Cruz, CA: ETR Associates.
54.
MarsigliaF. F.KulisS.WagstaffD. A.ElekE. & DranD. (2005). Acculturation status and substance use prevention with Mexican and Mexican American youth. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 5(1/2), 85.
55.
MarsigliaF. F.MilesB. W.DustmanP., & SillsS. (2003). Ties that protect: An ecological perspective on Latino/a urban pre-adolescent drug use. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 11(3/4), 191.
56.
MarsigliaF. F., & WallerM. (2002). Language preference and drug use among Southwestern Mexican American middle school students. Children & Schools, 25(3), 145–158.
57.
MoonD.HechtM.JacksonK., & SpellersR. (1999). Ethnic and gender differences and similarities in adolescent drug use and refusals of drug offers. Substance Use & Misuse, 38(4), 1059–1083.
58.
The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. (2003). The formative years: Pathways to substance abuse among girls and young women ages 8–22. New York: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.
59.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. (1997) Alcohol and health: Ninth special report to the U.S. Congress. NIH Publication No. 97–4017. Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health (NIH).
60.
PereaA., & SlaterM. (1999). Power distance and collectivist/individualist strategies in alcohol warnings: Effects by gender and ethnicity. Journal of Health Communication, 4(4), 295–310.
61.
PentzM. (1994). Target population and interventions in prevention research: What is high risk? In CázaresA. & BeattyL. A. (Eds.), Scientific methods for prevention intervention research (NIDA Research Monograph, 139) (pp. 75–93). Rockville, MD: NIDA.
62.
PerryC. L.WilliamsC. L.Veblen-MortensonS.ToomeyT. L.KomroK. A.AnstineP. S.McGovernP. G.FinneganJ. R.ForsterJ. L.WagenaarA. C., & WolfsonM. (1996). Project Northland: Outcomes of a communitywide alcohol use prevention program during early adolescence. American Journal of Public Health, 86(7), 956–965.
63.
PortesA., & RumbautR. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
64.
RandolphW. M.Stroup-BenhamC.BlackS. A., & MarkidesK. S. (1998). Alcohol use among Cuban-Americans, Mexican Americans, and Puerto Ricans. Alcohol Health and Research World, 22(4), 265–269.
65.
RaudenbushS. W., & BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
66.
RoglerL. H.CortesD. E., & MalgadyR. G. (1991). Acculturation and mental health status among Hispanics: Convergence and new directions for research. American Psychologist, 46, 585–597.
67.
SamaniegoR., & GonzalezN. (1999). Multiple mediators of the effects of acculturation status on delinquency for Mexican American adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 189–210.
68.
SpiraM. K.GrossmanS. F., & Wolff-BensdorfJ. (2002). Voice and identity in a bicultural/bilingual environment. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 19(2), 115–138.
69.
SpringerJ. F.SambranoS.SaleE.KasimR., & HermannJ. (2002). “The National Cross-Site Evaluation of High-Risk Youth Programs: Making Prevention Effective for Adolescent Boys and Girls: Gender Differences in Substance Use and Prevention.” Monograph Series. Maryland: National Clearinghouse for Alcohol and Drug Information Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP).
70.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2003). Science-based prevention programs and principles, 2002. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
71.
ToblerN. S.RoonaM. R.OchshornP.MarshallD. G.StrekeA. V., & StackpoleK. M. (2000). School-based adolescent drug prevention programs: 1998 Meta-analysis. Journal of Primary Prevention, 20, 275–336.
72.
ToblerN. S., & StrattonH. H. (1997). Effectiveness of school-based drug prevention programs: Ameta-analysis of the research. Journal of Primary Prevention, 18, 71–128.
73.
VegaW. A., & GilA. G. (1998). Drug use and ethnicity in early adolescence. New York: Plenum Press.
74.
WallaceJ. M.BachmanP. M.O'MalleyP. M.SchulenbergJ. E.CooperS. M., & JohnstonL. D. (2003). Gender and ethnic differences in smoking, drinking, and illicit drug use among American 8th, 10th, and 12th grade students, 1976–2000. Addiction, 98, 225–234.
75.
WarnerL. A.ValdezA.VegaW. A.de la RosaM.TurnerR. J., & CaninoG. (2006). Hispanic drug use in an evolving cultural context: An agenda for research. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 84S, S8–S16.
76.
WycoffC. S., (2000). The García family: Using a structural systems approach with an alcohol-dependent family. Family Journal, 8(1), 47–57.
77.
XiongZ. B.EliasonP. A.DetznerD. F., & ClevelandM. J. (2005). Southeast Asian immigrant's perceptions of good adolescents and good parents. The Journal of Psychology, 139(2), 159–175.
78.
ZapataJ. T. & KatimsD. S. (1994). Antecedents of substance use among Mexican-American school age children. Journal of Drug Education, 24, 233–251.
79.
ZayasL. H.RojasM., & MalgadyR. G. (1998). Alcohol and drug use among Hispanic men in early adulthood. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26(3), 425–438.
