This article examines currently popular technical editorial practices in the preparation of communications directed at nontechnical readers. In light of these practices it presents source materials for reviewing readability research on available formulas and procedures, explaining their development, and demonstrating some of the benefits and pitfalls for editors and writers directing technical materials to the nontechnical reader. Concluding, the writer suggests that theoretical readability formula research become part of the corpus of information presented at pre- and in-service training programs for technical writers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KlareG. R., The Measurement of Readability, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, 1963.
2.
CilleyM. L., A Look at Readability Formulas, Unpublished Report, University of Florida, undated.
3.
DandridgeE. P.Jr., Notes Toward a Definition of Technical Writing, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 3: 4, pp. 265–272, 1973.
4.
KlareG. R., Assessing Readability, Reading Research Quarterly, 1, pp. 62–102, 1974–1975.
5.
DaleE. and ChallJ. S., A Formula for Predicting Readability, Educational Research Bulletin, pp. 11–20, 28, January 21, 1948.
6.
FleschR., How to Test Readability, Harper and Brothers, New York, 1951.
7.
McCallW. A. and CrabbsL. M., Standard Test Lessons in Reading: Teacher's Manual for All Books, New York Bureau of Publications, Teachers College Columbia University, 1925.
8.
LeRoyM. C., Meaning Evoked in Population Groups by Editorial Cartoons, unpublished dissertation detailed in Dissertation Abstracts, 28: 11-A, pp. 4588–4589, 1968.
9.
KlareG. R., A Second Look at the Validity of Readability Formulas, Journal of Reading Behavior, 8: 2, pp. 129–152, Summer 1976.
10.
TaylorW. L., Cloze Procedure: A New Tool for Measuring Readability, Journalism Quarterly, 30, pp. 415–433, Fall 1953.
11.
HuntK. W., Recent Measures in Syntatic Development, Elementary English, 43, pp. 732–739, November 1966.
12.
BormuthJ., Comparable Cloze and Multiple Choice Comprehension Test Scores, Journal of Reading, pp. 291–299, February 1967.
13.
News, Announcements, and Related Matters in Primary Journals, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 3: 4, 1973.
14.
Political Events Influenced Volume and Languages of Scholarly Publications, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 5: 2, 1975.
15.
Book Reviews in Primary Journals, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 5: 3, 1975.
