This study investigated fourth grade students' perceptions of abilities to use the Internet. The 31-item research instrument measuring Internet Self-Perceptions was adapted for use from the Reader Self-Perception Scale (RSPS) developed by Henk and Melnick (1995). The RSPS survey was based upon Bandura's (1977, 1986, 1995) research in the areas of perceived self-efficacy. Information from an administration of the Internet Self-Perception Scale (ISPS) uncovered four correlated factors, which described children's self-perceptions about their Internet skills. These four dimensions matched factors found with previous studies of self-efficacy and self-perceptions in other content areas and showed high reliability (Cronbach's alpha ranged .73–.87). Additionally, cluster analysis revealed five different types of Internet learners thought to be present in elementary school classrooms. Suggestions for teaching strategies and fostering children's perceptions of Internet skills are provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldenderferM. S.BlashfieldR. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
AnderbergM. R. (1973). Cluster analysis for applications. New York: Academic Press, Inc.
3.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
BanduraA. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism and human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.
5.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6.
BanduraA. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117–148.
7.
BanduraA. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BensonJ.HocevarD. (1986). The impact of item phrasing on the validity of attitude scales for elementary school children. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22, 231–240.
BottomleyD. M.HenkW. A.MelnickS. A. (1997). Assessing children's views about themselves as writers using the Writer Self-Perception Scale. The Reading Teacher, 51(4), 286–296.
11.
ComreyA.LeeH. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12.
CrockerL.AlginaJ. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston Publications.
13.
DanielC. S. (2000). A study of the effects of two instructional programs in reading on students reading self-efficacy, personal perceptions of the learning environment and reading levels. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
14.
DugganA.HessB.MorganD.KimS.WilsonK. (2001). Measuring students' attitudes toward educational use of the Internet. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(3), 267–282.
15.
FraserB. J. (1986). Classroom environments. London: Croom Helm.
16.
FraserB. J. (1992). Developments and changes in the study of learning environments: Looking back, sideways and forward. In WaxmanH. C.EllettC. D. (Eds.), The study of learning environments (Vol. 5, pp. 1–20). Houston, TX: College of Education, University of Houston.
17.
FraserB. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7–33.
18.
GorsuchR. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19.
HarrisJ. B.GrandgenettN. (1999). Correlates with use of telecomputing tools: K-12 teachers' beliefs and demographics. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 327–340.
20.
HartiganJ. A. (1975). Clustering algorithms. New York: Wiley.
21.
HenkW. A.MelnickS. A. (1995). The reader self-perception scale (RSPS): A new tool for measuring how children feel about themselves as readers. The Reading Teacher, 48(6), 470–482.
22.
KaufmanM.AgardJ.SemmelM. (1985). Mainstreaming learners and their environment. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
23.
KnightS. L.WaxmanH. C. (1991). Students' cognition and classroom instruction. In WaxmanH. C.WalbergH. J. (Eds.), Effective teaching: Current research (pp. 239–255). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
24.
LoehlinJ. C. (1992). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25.
LoupK.EllettC.ChauvinS.LoftonG.HillF.EvansL. (1993). Student perception, student engagement and student achievement correlates of comprehensive, classroom-based learning environment assessment system. In FisherD. L. (Ed.), The study of learning environments (Vol. 7), Perth, Western Australia: Science and Mathematics Education Centre, Curtin University of Technology.
26.
MacQueenJ. B. (1967). Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1, 211–297.
27.
MarshH. W. (1986). The bias of negatively worded items in rating scales for young children: A cognitive-developmental phenomenon. Developmental Psychology, 22, 37–39.
28.
MassoudS. L. (1991). Computer attitudes and computer knowledge of adult students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7(3), 269–291.
PresnoC. (1998). Taking the byte out of Internet anxiety: Instructional techniques that reduce computer/Internet anxiety in the classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 18(2), 147–161.
31.
SarleW. S. (1983). Cubic clustering criterion, SAS Technical Report A-108. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
32.
SAS for Windows, version 8.0 (1996). Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
33.
SPSS for Windows, version 11.0 (2001). Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc.
34.
SelwynN. (2001). Turned on/switched off: Exploring children's engagement with computers in primary school. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(3), 245–266.
35.
TakacsJ.ReedM. R.WellsJ. G.DombrowskiL. A. (1999). The effects of online multimedia project development, learning style, and prior computer experiences on teachers' attitudes toward the Internet and hypermedia. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 341–355.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics (1999). Student computer use. Retrieved April 11, 2002, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs99/1999011.pdf
38.
WardJ. H. (1963). Hierarchial grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244.
39.
WittrockM. C. (1986). Students' thought processes. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed.). London: Macmillan.
40.
WolfradtU.DollJ. (2001). Motives of adolescents to use the Internet as a function of personality traits, personal and social factors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24(1), 13–28.
41.
WoodrowJ. E. (1991). A comparison of four computer attitude scales. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7(2), 165–187.
42.
ZhangY.EspinozaS. (1998). Relationships among computer self-efficacy, attitudes towards computers, and desirability of learning computer skills. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(4), 420–431.
