The recent psychoanalytic literature on creative artists is characterized by a paucity of empirical research. This study reviews some of the main analytic hypotheses, derived from object relations and self-psychology theory, about the intrapsychic structure characterizing artists and empirically tests those suppositions. The Rorschach test was administered to two groups of graduate students: twenty enrolled in Masters of Fine Arts programs and a control group of twenty students enrolled in Masters programs in non-art fields. Test results were analyzed via scoring systems designed to assess pertinent psychoanalytic constructs. Compared to the control subjects, the art students exhibited: more frequent generation of transitional objects; greater fluidity of self/other boundaries; more extensive preoccupation with early separation/individuation issues; more vulnerability to self-fragmentation anxiety; and greater manufacturing of idealized objects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArietiS. (1976). The magic synthesis.New York: Basic Books.
2.
BondA. H. (1985). Virginia Woolf: Manic-depressive psychosis and genius. An illustration of separation-individuation theory. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 13, 191–210.
3.
BrinkA. (1974). On the psychological sources of creative imagination. Queens Quarterly, 81, 1–19.
4.
BurkeW.FriedmanG., & GorlitzP. (1988). The psychoanalytic Rorschach profile: An integration of drive, ego, and object relations perspectives. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 5, 193–212.
5.
CoonertyS. (1986). An exploration of separation-individuation themes in the borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 501–511.
6.
CoonertyS. (no date). Separation-individuation theme scale scoring manual (1st ed.). (Available from [Dr. S. Coonerty, 825 West End Ave., #14A, New York, NY 10025].)
EhrenzweigA. (1967). The hidden order of art.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
9.
ExnerJ. E.Jr. (1985). A Rorschach workbook for the comprehensive system (2nd ed.). Bayville, NY: Rorschach Workshops.
10.
FreudS. (1961). Dostoevski and parricide. In StracheyJ. (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 21, pp. 175–196). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1927.)
11.
GorlitzP.BurkeW., & FriedmanG. (1989). Manual: Psychoanalytic Rorschach Profile. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago.
12.
GreenbergR.CraigS.SeidmanL. J.CooperS., & TeeleA. (1987). Transitional phenomena and the Rorschach: A test of a clinical theory of borderline personality organization. In GrotsteinJ. S.SolomonM. F., & LangJ. A. (Eds.), The borderline patient: Emerging concepts in diagnosis, psychodynamics, and treatment (Vol. 1, pp. 83–94). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
13.
HamiltonJ. W. (1969). Object loss, dreaming, and creativity: The poetry of John Keats. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 23, 488–531.
14.
HamiltonJ. W. (1979). Transitional phenomena and the early writings of Eugene O'Neill. International Review of Psychoanalysis, 6, 49–60.
15.
HymerS. M. (1983). The therapeutic nature of art in self reparation. Psychoanalytic Review, 70, 57–68.
16.
KahneM. J. (1967). On the persistence of transitional phenomena into adult life. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 48, 247–258.
17.
KaltenbachJ. L. (1986). An exploratory study of creativity from an object relations perspective. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47(6) (University Microfilms No. 8621170).
18.
KleinM. (1929). Infantile anxiety-situations reflected in a work of art and in the creative impulse. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 10, 436–443.
19.
KligermanC. (& panel) (1972). International Psychoanalytic Congress panel on creativity. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 53, 21–29.
20.
KligermanC. (1980). Art and the self of the artist. In GoldbergA. (Ed.), Advances in self-psychology (pp. 383–396). New York: International Universities Press.
21.
KohutH. (1978). Creativeness, charisma, group psychology. In OrnsteinP. (Ed.), The search for the self (Vol. 2, pp. 793–843). New York: International Universities Press.
22.
KrisE. (1952). Psychoanalytic explorations in art.New York: International Universities Press.
23.
MahlerM. S.PineF., & BergmanA. (1975). The psychological birth of the human infant.New York: Basic Books, Inc.
24.
NiederlandW. G. (1967). Clinical aspects of creativity. American Imago, 24, 6–34.
25.
NiederlandW. G. (1976). Psychoanalytic approaches to artistic creativity. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 45, 185–212.
26.
PowellC. (1985). Creativity and the boundaries of the self: Separation and engulfment anxiety in Keats and Poe. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 19, 355–361.
27.
RobbinsM. D. (1969). On the psychology of artistic creativity. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 24, 227–251.
28.
RoseG. J. (1964). Creative imagination in terms of ego “core” and boundaries. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 45, 75–84.
29.
RoseG. J. (1978). The creativity of everyday life. In GrolnickS. A.BarkinL., & MuensterbergerW. (Eds.), Between reality and fantasy: Winnicott's concepts of transitional objects and phenomena (pp. 345–362). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson Inc.
30.
RoseG. J. (1980). The power of form: A psychoanalytic approach to aesthetic form.Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
31.
WinnicottD. W. (1967). The location of cultural experience. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 48, 368–372.
32.
WinnicottD. W. (1971). Playing and reality.New York: Routledge.
33.
WinnicottD. W. (1975). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena. In WinnicottD. W., Through pediatrics to psycho-analysis (pp. 229–242). New York: Basic Books.
