The question of the relationship between human rights and population growth is examined from the perspective of the rights and status of women. A brief review of the literature indicates that no necessary connection between an improvement in the status of women and a reduction of fertility has yet been discovered. The most promising investigations are found in culturally and regionally specific studies. The involvement of women in birth control and population growth is classified, and the concerns of feminists identified. The partial contradiction between the goals of feminism and the control of population, and the relatively unresearched aspects of reproduction are made explicit. The paper concludes that the voice of women should be heard in the worldwide population debate and in the national action plans for contraception, not just as representatives of government, the academy, or the professions, but as women-the people most intimately affected by the present population policies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ReitzJ. G.Use of Social Research in Population Programs: A Case Study of a Policy Debate Among Social Science Experts. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, New Orleans, 1972.
2.
BanksJ. A., and BanksO.Feminism and Family Planning in Victorian England, pp. 103–130. Shocken Books, New York, 1964.
3.
DavisK.Population policy: Will current programs succeed?Science158: 730–739, 1967.
4.
WeinerM.Political demography: An inquiry into the political consequences of population change. In Rapid Population Growth, Consequences and Policy Implications, edited by a committee of the National Academy of Sciences (R. Revelle, chairman), pp. 567–617. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1971.
5.
CarterL. J.New feminism: Potent force in birth-control policy. Science167: 1234–1236, 1970.
6.
WrayJ. D.Population pressure on families: Family size and child spacing. In Rapid Population Growth, Consequences and Policy Implications, edited by a committee of the National Academy of Sciences, (R. Revelle, chairman), pp. 403–461. Johns Hopkins Press, 1971.
7.
United Nations Declaration of Human Rights. Reprinted in Basic Documents on Human Rights, edited by BrownlieI., pp. 106–112. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1971.
8.
United Nations Declaration on Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, 1967. Reprinted in Basic Documents on Human Rights, edited by BrownlieI., pp. 183–187. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1971.
9.
CoserR. L., and RokoffG.Women in the occupational world: Social disruption and conflict. Social Problems18: 535–554, 1971.
10.
CollinsR.A conflict theory of sexual stratification. Social Problems19: 3–21, 1971.
11.
DyckA. J.Population policies and ethical acceptability. In Rapid Population Growth, Consequences and Policy Implications, edited by a committee of the National Academy of Sciences (R. Revelle, chairman), pp. 617, 618–638. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1971.
12.
BlakeJ.Demographic science and the redirection of population policy. In Public Health and Population Change, edited by ShepsM. C. and RidleyJ. C., pp. 41–69. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 1965.
13.
HawthornG.The Sociology of Fertility, pp. 92, 103. Macmillan and Company, London, 1970.
14.
BoserupE.Woman's Role in Economic Development, p. 208. George Allen and Unwin, London, 1970.
15.
MitchellJ.Woman's Estate, pp. 139–182. Random House, New York, 1971.
16.
BusfieldJ.Ideologies and reproduction. In The Integration of a Child into a Social World, edited by RichardsM.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1970 (mimeographed).
17.
Safilios-RothschildC.A cross-cultural examination of women's marital, educational and occupational options. Acta Sociologica14: 96–113, 1971.
18.
SalaffJ.Institutionalized motivation for fertility limitation in China. Population Studies26: 233–262, 1972.
19.
TharparR.The history of the female emancipation in southern Asia. In Women in the New Asia, edited by WardB., pp. 473–499. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, New York, 1963.
20.
WestoffC. F., and PotvinR.College Women and Fertility Values. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1966.
21.
BowenW. G., and FineganT. A.The Economics of Labor Force Participation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1969.
22.
FirestoneS.The Dialectic of Sex, p. 6Jonathan Cape, London, 1971.
23.
de BeauvoirS.The Second Sex, p. 29. Alfred Knopf, New York, 1952.
24.
StycosJ. M.Opinion, ideology and population problems-Sources of domestic and foreign opposition to birth control. In Rapid Population Growth, Consequences and Policy Implications, edited by a committee of the National Academy of Sciences (R. Revelle, chairman), pp. 533–566, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1971.
25.
KennedyD. M.Birth Control in America, The Career of Margaret Sanger. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1970.
26.
CislerL.Unfinished business: Birth control and women's liberation. In Sisterhood is Powerful, edited by MorganR., pp. 245–288. Vintage Books, New York, 1970.
27.
VaughnP.The Pill on Trial, pp. 166–168, 171–175. Penguin Books, London, 1970.
28.
JaffeF.Access to abortion and family planning. In Women's Role in Contemporary Society, p. 49. The Report of the New York City Commission on Human Rights, September 1970. Avon Books, New York, 1972.
29.
EasleyE. B.The dilemma of women in our culture: Gynecology repercussions, part II. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 110: 858–864, 1971.
30.
AtkinsonT-G.The institution of sexual intercourse. In Notes from the Second Year: Women's Liberation, pp. 42–46. Notes from the Second Year, New York, 1970.
BartP. B.Depression in middle-aged women. In Women in Sexist Society, edited by GornickV. and MorganB. K.. Basic Books, New York, 1971.
33.
MooreE. C.Changing sex roles, alternate life styles and fertility control. Concerned Demography2: 7–10, 1971.
34.
IllsleyR.Sociological research and population control. Social Science Research Council Newsletter16: 6–8, 1972.
35.
HoroszowskiP.Woman's status in socialistic and capitalistic countries I. International Journal of Sociology of the Family1: 35–52, 1971.
36.
GillD. G.Some socio-cultural aspects of contraception and sexual behaviour in industrial society. In Family Planning Research Conference: A Multidisciplinary Approach, edited by GoldsmithA. and SnowdenR.. Amsterdam, 1972.
37.
ScanzoniJ., and McMurryM.Continuities in the explanation of fertility control. Journal of Marriage and the Family34: 315–321, 1972.
