Before the 1920s, a birth control movement arose in the United States out of socialist, feminist, and other radical groups concerned with women's rights and sexual freedom. After 1920 the birth control movement became gradually transformed into a respectable, nonradical reform cause, the recipient of large grants from big business, with women's rights secondary to an overriding concern with medical health and population control. This transformation was achieved through the professionalization of the birth control movement—that is, its takeover by professional experts, almost all male, in place of the radical amateur women, fighting for their own interests, who initiated it. The article examines two groups of professionals who were particularly influential in this transformation: doctors and academic eugenists. The former made birth control a medical issue, held back the development of popular sex education, and stifled a previously developing feminist approach to women's birth control needs. The latter contributed racism to the birth control movement, helping to transform it into a population control movement with racist and anti-feminist overtones. Both groups, while they made contributions to the technology of contraception, simultaneously held back the spread of birth control by transforming the campaign for it from a popular, participatory cause to a professional staff lobbying operation.
KarierC. J.Testing for order and control. In Roots of Crisis: American Education in the Twentieth Century, edited by KarierC. J.ViolasP.SpringJ., Rand-McNally, Chicago, 1973.
3.
GoddardH.Psychology of the Normal and Subnormal, p. 234. Dodd, Mead, New York, 1919.
4.
FishbeinM.Medical Follies, p. 142. Boni & Liveright, New York, 1925.
5.
McCannF.Presidential address to League of National Life. Medical Press and Circular, p. 359, November 3, 1926.
6.
KosmakG. In Bulletin, Lying-in Hospital of the City of New York, pp. 181–192, August 1917.
7.
KennedyD.Birth Control in America: The Career of Margaret Sanger. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1970.
8.
DickinsonR. L.Letter to J. Bentley Squier, November 10, 1925. Dickinson Manuscripts, Countway Library, Harvard University Medical School, Boston.
9.
ReedJ.Birth Control and the Americans: 1830–1970, Part III: Robert L. Dickinson and the Committee on Maternal Health, pp. 77–82. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, unpublished, 1974.
10.
LaderL.The Margaret Sanger Story, p. 216. Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y., 1955.
11.
VreelandF. M.American Birth Control League files. In The Process of Reform with Especial Reference to Reform Groups in the Field of Population. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, unpublished, 1929.
12.
SangerM.Letter to J. Noah Slee, February 22, 1925. Sanger Manuscripts, Library of Congress, Washington, D. C.
13.
WishardW. N.Sr.Contraception: Are our county societies being used for the American Birth Control League propaganda?J. Indiana State Med. Assoc., pp. 187–189, May 1929.
14.
Proceedings, Sixth International Birth Control Conference, Vol. III, pp. 19–30, 49–60. American Birth Control League, New York, 1925.
15.
Mimeographed letter to Voluntary Parenthood League members from President Myra P. Gallert, December 2, 1925. Alice Park Manuscripts, Stanford University Library, Stanford, California.
16.
DennettM. W.Birth Control Laws, pp. 72–93. Frederick H. Hitchcock, New York, 1926.
17.
KonikowA. F.The doctor's dilemma in Massachusetts. Birth Control ReviewXV(1): 21–22, 1931.
18.
JackC. C. In Birth Control ReviewII(3): 7–8,1918.
19.
JackC. C.Letter to Charles Birtwell, June 17, 1917. Ames Manuscripts, Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College library, Northampton, Massachusetts.
20.
JackC. C.Letter to Blanche Ames Ames, January 7, 1918. Ames Manuscripts, Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College Library, Northampton, Massachusetts.
21.
Birth Control League of Massachusetts Records, Schlesinger Library, Radcliffe College, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
22.
Boston Post, July 25, 1916. Quoted in The Birth Control League of Massachusetts, p. 21, by GeigD. McCarrick. Unpublished B.A. Thesis, Simmons College, 1973.
23.
Birth Control and Public Policy, Decision of Judge Harry M. Fisher of the Circuit Court of Cook County, November 23, 1923. Illinois Birth Control League, 1924 (pamphlet).
24.
SangerM.Autobiography, pp. 374, 402–408. W. W. Norton, New York, 1938.
25.
LittleC. C.Letter to Robert L. Dickinson, October 28, 1925. Sanger Manuscripts, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C.
26.
PickensD. K.Eugenics and the Progressives, p. 51. Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville, 1968.
27.
HallerM.Eugenics: Hereditarian Attitudes in American Thought, p. 174. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J., 1963.
28.
PopenoeP.The Conservation of the Family, pp. 129–130. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1926.
29.
GuyerM. F.Being Well-Born. An Introduction to Eugenics, pp. 296–298. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1916.
30.
StoddardL.Revolt Against Civilization: The Menace of the Under Man, p. 21. Scribners, New York, 1922.
31.
Fourth Report, Committee on Selective Immigration, American Eugenics Society, June 30, 1928, p. 16. In Anita Newcomb McGee Manuscripts, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C.
32.
PopenoeP.JohnsonR. H.Applied Eugenics, pp. 294–297. Macmillan, New York, 1918.
33.
LorimerF.WinstonE.KiserL. K.Foundations of American Population Policy, pp. 12–15. Harper and Brothers, New York, 1940.
34.
HalfordS. H.Dysgenic tendencies of birth-control and of the feminist movement. In Population and Birth Control, p. 238, edited by EdenPaulCedar. Critic and Guide, New York, 1917.
35.
BergenH.Eugenics and the social problem. Birth Control ReviewIV(4): 5–6, 15–17, 1920.
36.
PaulE.Eugenics and birth-control. In Population and Birth Control, p. 134, edited by EdenPaulCedar. Critic and Guide, New York, 1917.
37.
QuesselL.Race suicide in the United States. In Population and Birth Control, edited by EdenPaulCedar. Critic and Guide, New York, 1917.
38.
Letter of December 20, 1865, from Elizabeth Stanton to Martha Wright. In Elizabeth Cady Stanton as Revealed in Her Letters, Diary and Reminiscences, edited by StantonT.BlatchH. Stanton. Harper and Brothers, New York, 1922.
39.
KraditorA.Ideas of the Woman Suffrage Movement 1890–1920, Ch. 7. Columbia University Press, New York, 1965.
40.
SangerM.Why not birth control clinics in America?Birth Control ReviewIII(5): 10–11, 1919.
41.
SangerM.Woman and the New Race, p. 34. Brentano's, New York, 1920.
42.
SangerM.The Pivot of Civilization, pp. 177–178. Brentano's, New York, 1922.
43.
Stenographic Record of the Proceedings of the First American Birth Control Conference, 1921, p. 24. American Birth Control League, New York, 1921.
44.
The Necessity for Birth Control. Speech by Margaret Sanger in Oakland, California, December 19, 1928. Stenographic Record in Sanger Manuscripts, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C.
45.
My Way to Peace. Speech by Margaret Sanger to New History Society, January 17, 1932. In Margaret Sanger Manuscripts, Smith College Library, Northampton, Massachusetts.
46.
Report, Fifth International Neo-Malthusian and Birth Control Conference, edited by PierpontR., Heinemann, London, 1922.
47.
PopenoeP. In Birth Control ReviewI(3): 6, 1917.
48.
ThompsonW.Race suicide in the United States. Birth Control ReviewIV(8): 9–10, IV(9): 9–10, IV(10): 10–11, IV(11): 14, 1920; V(l): 16, V(2): 9–12, V(3): 11–13, 1921.
49.
Immigration and birth control (editorial). Birth Control ReviewVII(9): 219–220, 1923.
50.
WinsorM.The cost to the state of the socially unfit. Birth Control ReviewVII(9): 222–224, 1923.
51.
EllisH.Review of Lothrop Stoddard's The Rising Tide of Color Against White World Supremacy. Birth Control ReviewIV(10): 14–16, 1920.
52.
LittleC. C.Unnatural selection and its resulting obligations. Birth Control ReviewX(8): 243–244, 257, 1926.
53.
DavisK. B.Factors in the Sex Life of Twenty-Two Hundred Women. Harper and Brothers, New York, 1929.
54.
TermanL.Psychological Factors in Marital Happiness. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1938.
55.
HamiltonG. V. T.A Research in Marriage. A & C Boni, New York, 1929.
56.
RobinsonC. H.Seventy Birth Control Clinics. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1930.
57.
JaffeF.S.PolgarS.Family planning and public policy: Is the “Culture of Poverty” the new cop-out? In Readings in Family Planning, p. 169, edited by McCalisterDonald V.ThiessenVictorMcDermottMargaret. C. V. Mosby, St. Louis, 1973.
58.
FairchildH. P.Speech in Planned Parenthood Federation of America Manuscripts, p. 169. Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College Library, Northampton, Massachusetts.
