This study aimed to explore older peoples' definitions of, and priorities for, a good quality of life for themselves and their peers. Nine hundred and ninety-nine people aged 65 and over, living at home in Britain, were interviewed for the study. Good social relationships were the most commonly mentioned constituent that gave respondents' lives quality (mentioned by 81 percent). Other important factors were social roles and activities, health, psychological outlook and well-being, home and neighborhood, finances, and independence. Poor health was most often mentioned as taking quality away from life (by 50 percent). Social relationships and health were judged to be the most important areas. Having health and enough money were the two most frequently mentioned things that would improve the quality of their own lives and those of their peers (though in different order of magnitude). The need for dynamic, multidimensional, and integrated models of quality of life in older age is suggested by these results.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndrewsF. M., (Ed.) (1986). Research on the quality of life.Michigan: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.
2.
AndrewsF. M., & WitheyS. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: American's perceptions of life quality.New York: Plenum Press.
3.
BaltesP. B., & BaltesM. M., (Eds.) (1990). Successful aging. Perspectives from the behavioural sciences.New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BerkmanL. F., & GlassT. (2000). Social integration, social networks, social support and health. In BerkmanL. F. & KawachiI. (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 137–173). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
BondJ., & CarstairsV. (1982). Services for the elderly: A survey of the characteristics and needs of Edinburgh: A population of 5,000,000 old people. Scottish Home and Health Studies No. 42. Edinburgh: Scottish Home and Health Department.
6.
BowlingA. (1993). The concepts of successful and positive ageing. Family Practice, 10, 449–453.
7.
BowlingA. (1994). Social networks and support among older people and implications for emotional well-being and psychiatric morbidity. International Review of Psychiatry, 9, 447–459.
8.
BowlingA. (1995a). What things are important in people's lives?Social Science and Medicine, 41, 1447–1462.
9.
BowlingA. (1995b). The most important things in life. Comparisons between older and younger population age groups by gender. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6, 169–175.
10.
BowlingA. (1996). The effects of illness on quality of life. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 50, 149–155.
11.
BowlingA. (1997). Measuring health. A review of quality of life measurement scales (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
12.
BowlingA. (2001). Measuring disease. A review of disease specific quality of life measurement scales (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
13.
BowlingA.BannisterD.SuttonS.EvansO., & WindsorJ. (2002). A multidimensional model of quality of life. Ageing and Mental Health, 6, 355–371.
14.
BowlingA.FarquharM., & BrowneP. (1991). Life satisfaction and associations with social network and support variables in three samples of elderly people. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 6, 549–566.
15.
BowlingA.FarquharM., & GrundyE. (1996). Associations with changes in life satisfaction among three samples of elderly people living at home. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 11, 1077–1087.
16.
BowlingA.FarquharM.GrundyE., & FormbyJ. (1993). Changes in life satisfaction over a two and a half year period among very elderly people living in London. Social Science and Medicine, 36, 641–655.
17.
BowlingA., & GrundyE. (1998). Longitudinal studies of social networks and mortality in later life. Review in Clinical Gerontology, 8, 353–361.
18.
BowlingA., & WindsorJ. (2001). Towards the good life. A population survey of dimensions of quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2, 55–81.
19.
CellaD. F., & TulskyD. S. (1990). Measuring quality of life today: Methodological aspects. Oncology, 4, 29–38.
20.
CiceroM. T. (44 BC) (1979). His discourse of old age. Reprinted by Arno Press, PA.
21.
CooperK.ArberS.FeeL., & GinnJ. (1999). The influence of social support and social capital on health: A review and analysis of British data.London: Health Education Authority.
22.
DayA. T. (1991). Remarkable survivors.Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
23.
FarquharM. (1995). Elderly people's definitions of quality of life. Social Science and Medicine, 41, 1439–1446.
24.
FayersP. M., & HandD. J. (2002). Causal variables, indicator variables and measurement scales: An example from quality of life. Journal of the Royal Statistical Association, 165, Part 2: 1–21.
25.
FitzpatrickR. (1999). Assessment of quality of life as an outcome: Finding measurements that reflect individual's priorities (editorial). Quality in Health Care, 8, 1–2.
26.
FryP. S. (2000). Whose quality of life is it anyway? Why not ask seniors to tell us about it?International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 50, 361–383.
27.
GarrattA. M. & RutaD. A. (1999). The Patient Generated Index. In JoyceC. R. B.O'BoyleC. A., & McGeeH. (Eds.), Individual quality of life. Approaches to conceptualisation and assessment (pp. 105–118). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
28.
GoldbergD. P., & WilliamsP. (1988). A user's guide to the General Health Questionnaire.Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
29.
GrundyE., & BowlingA. (1997). The sociology of ageing. In JacobyR. & OppenheimerC. (Eds.), Psychiatry in the elderly (2nd ed., pp. 24–36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
HickeyA.O'BoyleC. A.McGeeH. M., & JoyceC. R. B. (1999). The schedule for the evaluation of individual quality of life. In JoyceC. R. B.O'BoyleC. A., & McGeeH. (Eds.), Individual quality of life. Approaches to conceptualisation and assessment (pp. 119–134). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
31.
KushmanJ., & LaneS. (1980). A multivariate analysis of factors affecting perceived life satisfaction and psychological well-being among the elderly. Social Science Quarterly, 61, 264–277.
32.
LarsonR. (1978). Thirty years of research on the subjective well-being of older Americans. Journal of Gerontology, 33, 109–125.
33.
LauR. R.HartmanK. A., & WareJ. E. (1986). Health as a value: Methodological and theoretical considerations. Health Psychology, 5, 25–43.
34.
LawtonM. P. (1980). Environment and aging.Monterrey, CA: Brooks Cole.
35.
LawtonM. P. (1991). A multidimensional view of quality of life in frail elders. In BirrenJ. E.LubbenJ.RoweJ., & DeutchmanD. (Eds.), The concept and measurement of quality of life.New York: New Academic Press.
36.
LawtonM. P. (1996). Quality of life and affect in later life. In MagaiC.McFaddenS. H. (Eds.), Handbook of emotion, human development, and aging.San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
37.
LowenthalM. F., & HavenC. (1968). Interaction and adaptation: Intimacy as a critical variable. American Sociology Review, 33, 20–30.
38.
MaddoxG. (1963). Activity and morale: A longitudinal study of selected elderly subjects. Social Forces, XLII, 195–204.
39.
MarkidesK. S., & MartinH. W. (1979). A causal model of life satisfaction among the elderly. Journal of Gerontology, 34, 86–93.
40.
MartinJ.MeltzerH., & ElliotD. (1988). The prevalence of disability among adults. OPCS Surveys of Disability in Great Britain. No. 1. London: HMSO.
41.
MaslowA. (1954). Motivation and personality.Harper: New York.
42.
NelsonC.MurrayR.HenkeN.WisemanO., & TateJ. (McKinsey and Company) (2001). Expectations of the 2020 U.K. healthcare system. In Health trends review. Proceedings of a conference held by Her Majesty's Treasury, Health Trends Review Team. Barbican Conference Centre, London 18th and 19th November. London: Her Majesty's Treasury.
43.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community.New York: Simon and Schuster.
44.
RogersonR. J.FindlayA. M.CoombesM. G., & MorrisA. (1989). Indicators of quality of life. Environment and Planning, 21, 1655–1666.
45.
RoosN. P., & HavensB. (1991). Predictors of successful aging. American Journal of Public Health, 81, 63–68.
46.
ScanlonT. (1993). Value, desire, and quality of life. In NussbaumM. C. & SenA. (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 185–200). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
47.
ScheierM. F., & CarverC. S. (1985). Optimism, coping and health: Assessment and implications of generalised outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219–247.
48.
SchwarzerR. (1993). Measurement of perceived self-efficacy: Psychometric scales for cross-cultural research.Berlin: Free University of Berlin, Institute for Psychology.
49.
SherbourneC. D., & StewartA. L. (1991). The MOS social support survey. Social Science and Medicine, 32, 705–714.
50.
SkevingtonS. M. (1999). Measuring quality of life in Britain: Introducing the WHOQOL-100. Journal of Psychosocial Research, 47, 449–459.
51.
SkevingtonS. M.BradshawJ., & SaxenaS. (1999). Selecting national items for the WHOQOL: Conceptual and psychometric considerations. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 473–487.
52.
SpiroA., & BosséR. (2000). Relations between health-related quality of life and well-being: The gerontologist's new clothes. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 50, 297–318.
53.
SprangersM. A. G., & SchwartzC. E. (1999). Integrating response, shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 1507–1515.
54.
SuttonS. (1998). How ordinary people in Great Britain perceive the health risks of smoking. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 52, 338–339.
55.
TownsendP. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom.Harmondsworth: Pelican.
56.
UsuiW. M.ThomasJ. K., & DurigK. R. (1985). Socio-economic comparisons and life satisfaction of elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 110–114.
57.
WalkerA., & MaltbyT. (1997). Ageing Europe.Buckingham: Open University Press.
58.
WareJ. E.SnowK. K.KosinskiM., & GandekB. (1993). SF-36 Health Survey.Boston, MA: New England Medical Centre.
59.
WengerG. C. (1992). Morale in old age: A review of the evidence. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 7, 699–708.
60.
WentowskiG. (1981). Reciprocity and the coping strategies of older people: Cultural dimensions of network building. Gerontologist, 21, 600–609.
61.
WHOQOL Group (1993). Measuring quality of life: The development of the World Health Organisation Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL).Geneva: World Health Organisation.
62.
ZizziA.BarryM. M., & CochraneR. (1998). A mediational model of quality of life for individuals with severe mental problems. Psychological Medicine, 28, 1221–1230.
