Motivation effort is one of the critical components that enable students to engage in the process of ill-structured problem solving. This article chronicles the development and evaluation of a motivation-supported problem-solving environment promoting learning goals. The environment was created by developing learning-goal oriented contexts that included (1) presenting task messages that stressed the intrinsic value of learning, (2) allowing learners to control their own learning activities, and (3) providing self-referenced evaluations. Forty-six middle-school students participated. One major finding was that a learning-goal oriented context was a powerful motivational strategy that boosted students' intrinsic motivation for ill-structured problem solving.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbaneseM. A., & MitchellS. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine, 68(1), 52–81.
2.
AmesC. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271.
3.
AmesC., & ArcherJ. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260–267.
4.
BarrowsH. (1994). Practice-based learning: Problem-based learning applied to medical education.Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
5.
BerkelH., & SchmidtH. G. (2000). Motivation to commit oneself as a determinant of achievement in problem-based learning. Higher Education, 40(2), 231–242.
6.
DweckC. S., & LeggettE. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273.
7.
ElliotE. S., & DweckC. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5–12.
8.
EpsteinJ. (1989). Family structure and student motivation: A developmental perspective. In AmesC. & AmesR. (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 259–295). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.KarnsK.HamlettG. L.KatzaroffM., & DutkaS. (1997). Effects of task-focused goals on low-achieving students with and without learning disabilities. American Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 513–543.
10.
GeX. (2001). Scaffolding students' problem solving processes on an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interaction. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
11.
GeX., & LandS. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding ill-structured problem solving process using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research & Development, 52(2), 5–22.
12.
GottfriedA. E. (1985). Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 631–645.
13.
HarackiewiczJ. M.BarronK., & ElliotE. S. (1998). Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why?Educational Psychologist, 33(1), 1–21.
14.
JonassenD. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45(1), 65–94.
15.
MacKinnonM. J. (1999). CORE elements of student motivation in problem-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 78, 49–58.
16.
MaehrM. L., & MidgleyC. (1991). Enhancing student motivation: A school wide approach. Educational Psychologist, 26 (3&4) 399–427.
17.
MayerR. E. (1998). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. Instructional Science, 26, 49–63.
18.
MidgleyC.MaehrM. L.HrudaL. Z.AndermanE. M.AndermanL., & FreemanK. E. (2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scale.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
19.
NathL. R., & RossS. M. (2001). The influence of a peer tutoring training model for implementing cooperative groupings with elementary students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 41–56.
20.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
PintrichP. R. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92–104.
22.
PintrichP. R., & SchunkD. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
23.
RawsthroneL. J., & ElliotE. S. (1999). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(4), 326–344.
24.
SongH. (2004). Motivating online collaborative learning: Design implications from a learning goal orientation perspective. Educational Technology, 44(2) 43–47.
25.
TuC.-H., & CorryM. (2001). A paradigm shift for online community research. Distance Education, 22(20), 245–263.
