Distributive Learning in Introductory Chemical Engineering: University Students' Learning,Motivation,and Attitudes Using a CD-ROM

Abstract

This article reports a study in which student performance and approaches to study ina CD-ROM version of a chemical engineering course were examined. The study consists of three phases. The purpose of phase 1 was to evaluate of the efficacy of CD-ROM for this content and student population. Therefore, we compared the performance of students who participated in a traditional classroom offering with those who participated in the CD-ROM version. The results supported the soundness of the CD-ROM based instruction. In phase 2, we interviewed students who were successful and less successful in the course to examine any differences in the strategies they used for learning the content. Differences consistent with a surface versus deep approach to studying were found. Prior to the third phase, the CD-ROM and approaches to learning instrument were modified and then a new group of students was examined to determine the factors that contribute to success in the CD-ROM version. Results showed that deep cognitive engagement and motivation, defined in terms of goals and self-efficacy, were significant predictors of success uses two indices of course performance. The results suggest that although technology provides opportunities for learners to learn in increasingly independent environments, educators need to prepare students to learn independently using newer electronic technologies.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

J. R.

(2000). Cognitive psychology and its implications (5th ed.). New York: Freeman.

Ames

Archer

(1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267.

Bandura

(1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Biner

P. M.

Bink

M. L.

Huffman

M. L.

Dean

R. S.

(1995). Personality characteristics differentiating and predicting the achievement of televised-course students and traditional-course students. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 46–60.

Chi

M. T. H.

Feltovich

P. J.

Glaser

(1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by expert and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.

Chi

M. T. H.

Glaser

Farr

P. J.

(1993). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Coggins

C. C.

(1988). Preferred learning styles and their impact on completion of external degree programs. The American Journal of Distance Education, 2(1), 25–37.

Dille

Mezack

(1991). Identifying predictors of high risk among community college telecourse students. The American Journal of Distance Education, 5(1), 24–35.

Dillon

Greene

B. A.

(2003). Learner differences in distance education: Finding differences that matter, in Handbook of distance learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

10.

Garner

Alexander

P. A.

(1989). Metacognition: Answered and unanswered questions. Educational Psychologist, 24, 143–158.

11.

Geiger

M. A.

Boyle

E. J.

(1992). A factor analysis of Kolb's Revised Learning Style Inventory, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(3), 753–759.

12.

Greene

B. A.

DeBacker

T. K.

Ravindran

Krows

A. J.

(1999). Goals, values, and beliefs as predictors of achievement and effort in high school mathematics classes. Sex Roles, 40(5), 421–458.

13.

Greene

B. A.

Miller

R. B.

(1996). Influences on course performance: Goals, perceived ability, and self-regulation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 181–192.

14.

Kember

Harper

(1987). Implications for instruction arising from the relationship between approaches to studying and academic outcomes. Instructional Science, 16, 35–46.

15.

Mayer

R. E.

(1980). Elaboration techniques that increase the meaningfulness of technical text: An experimental test of a learning strategy hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 770–784.

16.

Mayer

R. E.

(1989). Models for understanding. Review of Educational Research, 59, 43–64.

17.

Meece

J. L.

Blumenfeld

P. C.

Hoyle

R. H.

(1988). Students' goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514–523.

18.

Miller

R. B.

Greene

B. A.

Montalvo

G. P.

Ravindran

Nicholls

(1996). Engagement in academic work: The role of learning goals, future consequences, pleasing others, and perceived ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 388–442.

19.

Navarro

Shoemaker

(2000). Performance and perceptions of distance learners in cyberspace. American Journal of Distance Education, 14(2).

20.

Nolen

S. B.

(1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 269–287.

21.

Oxford

Young

Ito

Sumrall

(1993). Factors affecting achievement in a satellite delivered Japanese language program. The American Journal of Distance Education, 7(1), 11–25.

22.

Pintrich

P. R.

DeGroot

E. V.

(1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.

23.

Pintrich

P. R.

Garcia

(1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In Maehr

Pintrich

P. R.

(Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Goals and self-regulatory processes (Vol. 7, pp. 271–402). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

24.

Pittenger

D. J.

(1993). The utility of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Review of Educational Research, 63(4), 467–488.

25.

Popham

J. W.

(1990). Modern educational measurement: A practitioner's perspective (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

26.

Pugliese

R. R.

(1994). Telecourse persistence and psychological variables. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(3), 22–39.

27.

Ravindran

Greene

B. A.

(2000). The role of goals, beliefs and cognitive engagement in the prediction of preservice teachers' knowledge integration. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research.

28.

Richardson

J. T. E.

(2000). Researching student learning. Buckingham, UK: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

29.

Robins

Mayer

R. E.

(1993). Schema training in analogical reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 529–538.

30.

Sewell

T. J.

(1986). The measurement of learning style: A critique of four assessment tools. Green Bay, WI: Assessment Center, University of Wisconsin. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 267-247.)

31.

Zimmerman

B. J.

Martinez-Pons

(1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59.