Task Evaluation: Comparing Existing Curricula to Job Analysis Results

Abstract

The process of modifying existing curricula to reflect current job analysis results is often approached in a disorganized and unplanned manner. This is not the case in the nuclear power generating industry. The purpose of this article is to describe one such process for comparing existing curricula to new job and task analysis data. This model systematically allows for coding of all tasks, followed by a grouping of tasks by specific departmental requirements. A review by task is then conducted to determine if lesson plans exist which are applicable to the task, and to determine if further task analysis is indicated. The model allows for systematic review of curricula against specific needs of the job. It provides a basis for detailed analysis in any area needing work. Further, the model establishes a documented audit trail between lesson plans and specific tasks required on the job.