This investigation was designed to examine prescription drug-related content and learning objectives in Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.) for upper elementary and middle schools. Specific prescription-drug topics and context associated with content and objectives were coded. The coding system for topics included 126 topics organized within 14 categories. A two-dimensional coding system for context identified Use versus Abuse and Explicit versus Implicit references to prescription drugs. Results indicated that content and objectives found in D.A.R.E. represent a very narrow breadth of prescription drug topics. Moreover, all prescription-drug related content and objectives were presented in an Abuse-Implicit context. Although some educational material in D.A.R.E. modules potentially is related to prescription drugs, none of the content or objectives explicitly identify drugs discussed as prescription drugs. If elementary and middle schools rely on D.A.R.E. modules to teach students about drug abuse, students are likely to be under-informed about prescription drug risks.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ClaytonR. R.CattarelloA. M., & JohnstoneB. M. (1996). The effectiveness of drug abuse resistance education (project DARE): 5-year follow-up results. Preventive Medicine, 25, 307–318.
EnnettS. T.ToblerN. S.RingwaltC. L., & FlewellingR. L. (1994). How effective is drug abuse resistance education? A meta-analysis of project DARE outcome evaluations. American Journal of Public Health.84(9), 1394–1401.
4.
FerrellB.ViraniR.GrantM.VallerandA., & McCafferyM. (2000). Analysis of pain content in nursing textbooks. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 19, 216–228.
5.
HaleJ. L., & DillardJ. P. (1995). Fear appeals in health promotion campaigns: Too much, too little, or just right? In MaibachE. & ParrottR. L. (Eds.), Designing health messages: Approaches from communication theory and public health practice (pp. 63–80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Healthfinder—Your guide to reliable health information. (2002). Retrieved September 15, 2002, from http://healthfinder.gov.
7.
HorvathF., & MeesigR. (1998). A content analysis of textbooks on criminal investigation: An evaluative comparison to empirical findings on the investigative processes and role of forensic evidence. Journal of Forensic Science, 43, 133–140.
8.
Institute for Health and Social Policy. (n.d.). The new D.A.R.E. program: An information kit for educators. Akron, OH: The University of Akron. Retrieved September 25, 2003, from http://www.asapstudy.org/teachers/EducatorsKit.pdf.
9.
JacksonS. L.LugoS. M., & GriggsR. A. (2001). Research methods textbooks: An objective analysis. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 282–288.
10.
JobR. F. (1988). Effective and ineffective use of fear in health promotion campaigns. American Journal of Public Health, 78, 163–165.
11.
JohnstonL. D.O'MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G., & SchulenbergJ. E. (2005). Monitoring the future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2004. (NIH Pub. No. 05–5726). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
12.
Los Angeles Unified School District. (1994). Officer's guide to D.A.R.E. to resist drugs and violence: Grades 5–6. Los Angeles, CA: D.A.R.E America.
13.
Los Angeles Unified School District. (1997). D.A.R.E. to be safe from drugs and violence: Middle school/junior high school instructional manual. Los Angeles, CA: D.A.R.E. America.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). (2001). Prescription drugs: Abuse and addition. NIDA Research Report Series (NIH Pub. No. 01–4881). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
17.
Office of Applied Studies (OAS). (2003a, June). Trends in drug-related emergency department visits, 1994–2001 at a glance. The DAWN Report. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
18.
Office of Applied Studies (OAS). (2003b, July). Emergency department trends from the Drug Abuse Warning Network, final estimates 1995–2002. (DHHS Pub. No. (SMA) 03–3780). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
19.
Office of Applied Studies (OAS). (2004). Results from the 2003 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings (DHHS Pub. No. (SMA) 04–3964). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
20.
Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (ODPHP). (2000, January). Healthy people 2010: Understanding and improving health (conference edition). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC.
21.
TolanP. H., & LounsburyJ. W. (1982). Community mental health ideology presented in high school textbooks: A content analysis. Community Mental Health Journal, 18, 286–296.
22.
TurbesS.KrebsE., & AxtellS. (2002). The hidden curriculum in multicultural medical education: The role of case examples. Academic Medicine, 77, 209–216.
23.
WeilerR. M., & ClineR. J. W. (2003a). Hidden curriculum: Content analysis of prescription drug information in health education materials. Report to Prescription Abuse Among Youth Scientific Advisory Board, Purdue Pharma, L.P. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Center for Health Promotion.
24.
WeilerR. M., & ClineR. J. W. (2003b). Hidden curriculum: Content analysis of prescription drug information in health education materials. Technical supplements. Report to Prescription Abuse Among Youth Scientific Advisory Board, Purdue Pharma, L.P. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Center for Health Promotion.
25.
WongF. Y.HarperG. W.DuffyK. G.FaulringC., & EgglestonB. (2001). A content analysis of HIV/AIDS information in psychology textbooks: Implications for education, training, and practice. AIDS Education and Prevention, 13, 561–570.
26.
WyrickD.WyrickC. H.BibeauD. L., & Fearnow-KenneyM. (2001). Coverage of adolescent substance use prevention in state frameworks for health education. Journal of School Health, 71, 437–442.
27.
WysongE.AniskiewiczR., & WrightD. (1994). Truth and DARE: Tracking drug education to graduation and as symbolic politics. Social Problems, 41, 448–472.
