Amplification is the set of rhetorical techniques by which a discourse is elaborated and extended to enhance its appeal and information value. Even in the manual, long considered the most laconic of the genres of technical communication, amplification has its place. Drawing on the theory of classical and modern rhetoric, this article shows how amplification tends to increase and improve the coverage, rationale, warnings, behavioral alternatives, examples, previews, reviews, and general emphasis of technical manuals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KillingsworthM. J. and GilbertsonM. K., Rhetoric and Relevance in Technical Writing, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 16:4, pp. 287–297, 1986.
2.
KillingsworthM. J. and GilbertsonM. K., How Can Text and Graphics be Integrated Effectively?, in Solving Problems in Technical Writing, WhiteP. and BeeneL. (eds.), Oxford University Press, New York, 1988.
3.
KillingsworthM. J., Toward a Rhetoric of Technological Action, ITCC Proceedings, 1987.
4.
BurkeK., A Rhetoric of Motives, University of California Press, Berkeley, p. 71, 1950.
5.
Aristotle, The Rhetoric and the Poetics of Aristotle, RobertsW. R. and BywaterI. (trans.), CorbettE. P. J. (intro.), Modern Library, New York, Book 1, Chapter 9, p. 61, 1984.
6.
ShakespeareW., The Complete Works, Xerox Publishing Company, Waltham, Massachusetts, p. 1027, 1971.
7.
OchsD. J., Cicero's Rhetorical Theory, in A Synoptic History of Classical Rhetoric, MurphyJ. J. (ed.), Hermagoras Press, Davis, California, p. 124, 1983.
8.
LanhamR. A., A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms, University of California Press, Berkeley, p. 99, 1968.
9.
Cicero, De Oratore, Book III, Loeb Classical Library, RackamH. (ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, p. 161, 1977.
10.
Quintilian, Institutio Oratoria, Loeb Classical Library, ButlerH. E. (ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Vol. 3, p. 261, 1976.
11.
BridgmanP. W., The Logic of Modern Physics, Macmillan, New York, pp. 1–32, 1948.
12.
DiamondJ., Soft Sciences are Often Harder than Hard Sciences, Discover, pp. 34–39, August 1987.
13.
BurkeK., A Grammar of Motives, University of California Press, Berkeley, p. 280, 1945.
14.
CunninghamD. and CohenG., Creating Technical Manuals, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1984.
15.
BarkerT., Feedback in Hightech Writing, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 18:1, pp. 35–54, 1988.
16.
GrimmS. J., How to Write Computer Manuals for Users, Lifetime Learning Publications, Belmont, California, 1982.
17.
PriceJ., How to Write a Computer Manual, Benjamin/Cummings Publishers, Menlo Park, California, 1984.
18.
LanhamR. A., Analyzing Prose, Scribner's, New York, 1983.
19.
KillingsworthM. J., Can an English Teacher Contribute to the Energy Debate?, College English, 43, 1981.
20.
KillingsworthM. J., Science and Technology for a General Audience, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 25, 1982.
21.
KillingsworthM. J., A Bibliography on Proposal Writing, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 26, 1983.
22.
KillingsworthM. J., The Essay and the Report: Expository Poles in Technical Writing, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 15, 1985.
23.
KillingsworthM. J. and EilandK., Managing the Production of Technical Writing, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 29, 1986.
24.
KillingsworthM. J. and GilbertsonM. K., Rhetoric and Relevance in Technical Writing, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 16, 1986.
25.
KillingsworthM. J. and SandersS. P., Portfolios for Majors in Professional Communication, Technical Writing Teacher, 14, 1987.
26.
CoreyJ. and KillingsworthM. J., The Internship Report, Technical Writing Teacher, 14, 1987.
27.
KillingsworthM. J., Toward a Rhetoric of Technological Action, ITCC Proceedings, 1987.
28.
KillingsworthM. J., Guest Editorial: Thingishness and Objectivity in Technical Style, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 17, 1987.
29.
KillingsworthM. J. and GilbertsonM. K., How Can Text and Graphics Be Integrated Effectively?, in Solving Problems in Technical Communication, WhiteP. and BeeneL. (eds.), Oxford University Press, New York, 1988.
30.
GilbertsonM. K. and KillingsworthM. J., Behavioral Talk-Write as a Method for Teaching Technical Editing, Iowa State Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 1, 1987.
31.
GilbertsonM. K., Balancing Technical Communication Programs, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, PC-30, December 1987.
32.
GilbertsonM. K. and StephensD., A Method for Teaching Revising to ESL Composition Students, Journal of College Reading and Learning, 20, 1987.
33.
CoreyJ. and GilbertsonM. K., Quality in Bachelor's Degree Programs, Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of the Council for Programs in Technical and Scientific Communication, 1986.
34.
ChewJ.JandelJ., and MartinichA., The New Communicator: Engineering the Human Factor, ITCC Proceedings, 1986.
