This study investigates the relation between personality traits (Five-Factor-Model), personal (innovativeness, self-efficacy) and social (expectations or relevant reference groups) Internet related factors on the one hand and three motives (information, entertainment and, interpersonal communication) for going on-line among 122 adolescent Internet users on the other hand. The specificity hypothesis was supported in that Internet-specific personal and social factors together accounted for more variance of the 1nternet use motives than the global personality traits. With regard to the personality traits, neuroticism was found to be positively associated with the entertainment motive and with the interpersonal communication motive and extraversion was positively associated with the communication motive only. The potential of the three Internet motives to predict corresponding types of Internet activities was demonstrated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KrautR.PattersonM.LundmarkV.KieslerS.MukopadhyayT., and ScherlisW., Internet Paradox. A Social Technology that Reduces Social Involvement and Psychological Well-Being?American Psychologist, 53, pp. 1017–1031, 1998.
2.
GackenbachJ., (ed.), Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Transpersonal Implications, Academic Press, San Diego, 1998.
3.
AndersonR. H.BiksonT. K.LawS. A., and MitchellB. M., (eds.), Universal Access to e-Mail: Feasibility and Societal Implications, Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1995.
4.
KingJ. L. and KraemerK. L., Information Infrastructure, National Policy, and Global Competitiveness, Information Infrastructure and Policy, 4, pp. 5–28, 1995.
5.
ShererK., College Life On-Line: Healthy and Unhealthy Internet Use, Journal of College Student Development, 38, pp. 655–665, 1997.
6.
DollJ.PetersenL.-E., and RudolfM., Determinants of Internet Use among High School and University Students—An Application of the Theory of Planned and Role Guided Behavior [Determinanten der Internetnutzung von Gymnasiasten und Studenten— Eine Anwendung der Theorie geplanten und rollengesteuerten Verhaltens], Zeitschriftfür Medienpsychologie, 12, pp. 5–22, 2000.
7.
GriffithsM., Friendship and Social Development in Children and Adolescents: The Impact of Electronic Technology, Educational & Child Psychology, 14, pp. 25–37, 1997.
8.
TurkleS., Virtuality and Its Discontents: Searching for Community in Cyberspace, The American Prospect, 24, pp. 50–57, 1996.
9.
KatzJ. E. and AspenP., A Nation of Strangers?Communication of the ACM, 40, pp. 81–861997.
10.
RheingoldH., The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier, Addison Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1993.
11.
KrautR.MukhopadhyayT.SzczypulaJ.KieslerS., and ScherlisW., Communication and Information: Alternative Uses of the Internet in Households, in Proceedings of the CHI 98, ACM, New York, pp. 368–383, 1998.
12.
SproullL. and KieslerS., Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1991.
13.
WellmanB. and WortleyS., Different Stroke for Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support, American Journal of Sociology, 96, pp. 558–588, 1990.
14.
KrackhardtD., The Strength of Strong Ties: The Importance of Philos in Organization, in Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action, NohriaN. and EcclesR. (eds.), Harvard Bussiness School Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 1994.
15.
GittlerG. and KrizW., Adolescents and Computers: Attitudes, Personality, and Motives [Jugendliche und Computer: Einstellungen, Persönlichkeit und Interaktions-motive], Zeitschriftfür experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 39, pp. 171–193, 1992.
16.
PerseE. M. and FergusonD. A., Web Surfing Satisfaction, paper submitted to the Mass Communication Division of the National Communication Association, Seattle, Washington, November 2000.
17.
PerseE. M. and DunnD. G., The Utility of Home Computers and Media Use: Implications of Multimedia and Connectivity, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42, pp. 435–456, 1998.
18.
Morahan-MartinJ., Males, Females, and the Internet, in Psychology and the Internet: Interapersonal, Interpersonal and Transpersonal Implications, GackenbachJ. (ed.), Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 169–197, 1998.
19.
ShashaaniL., Gender Differences in Computer Experiences and Its Influence on Computer Attitudes, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11, pp. 347–367, 1994.
20.
ShashaaniL., Gender Differences in Computer Attitudes and the Use among College Students, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16, pp. 37–51, 1997.
21.
CostaP. T. and McCraeR. R., NEO-PI/FFI Manual Supplement, Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, 1989.
GoldsmithR. E. and HofackerC. F., Measuring Consumer Innovativeness, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19, pp. 209–221, 1991.
24.
AjzenI., The Theory of Planned Behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, pp. 179–211, 1991.
25.
FlynnL. R. and GoldsmithR. E., A Validation of the Goldsmith and Hofacker Innovativeness Scale, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, pp. 1105–1116, 1993.
26.
KrautR.ScherlisW.MukhopadhyayT.ManningJ., and KieslerS., The HomeNet Field Trial of Residential Internet Services, Communication of the ACM, 39, pp. 55–63, 1996.
27.
DavidJ. P. and SulsJ., Coping Efforts in Daily Life: Role of Big Five Traits and Problem Appraisal, Journal of Personality, 67, pp. 265–294, 1999.
