Chapter 11 bankruptcy provides an opportunity for addressing issues of power and control during corporate crisis. Abroad notion of power is essential in understanding the complex events that led to the Chapter 11 filing of the Manville Corporation, formerly the nation's leading asbestos manufacturer. The theory of finance hegemony places this case in an entirely new light by taking into account the power of the financial community. The Manville bankruptcy illuminates several mechanisms by which this hegemony operates. From this perspective, Chapter 11 bankruptcy is viewed as a choice made from a set of options severely constrained by other powerful institutions, rather than a result of managerial incompetence or market failure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerleA. A.Jr.MeansG. C.The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Harcourt, Brace and World, New York, 1968 [1932].
2.
BurnhamJ.The Managerial Revolution. John Day Company, New York, 1941.
3.
CyertR. M.MarchJ. G.Organizational factors in the theory of oligopoly. Q. J. Econ.70: 44–64, 1956.
4.
BerleA. A.Jr.The 20th Century Capitalist Revolution. Harcourt, Brace and World, New York, 1954.
5.
GordonR.Business Leadership in the Large Corporation. Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 1945.
6.
KaysenC.The social significance of the modern corporation. Am. Econ. Rev.47: 311–319, 1957.
7.
MarrisR.The Economic Theory of Managerial Capitalism. Macmillan, London, 1964.
8.
RockefellerD.Creative Management in Banking. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964.
9.
BaranP. A.SweezyP. M.Monopoly Capital. Monthly Review Press, New York, 1966.
10.
BaumD. J.StilesN. B.The Silent Partners: Institutional Investors and Corporate Control. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, 1965.
11.
GlasbergD. S.SchwartzM.Ownership and control of corporations. Annu. Rev. Sociol.9: 311–332, 1983.
12.
KammerschenD. R.The influence of ownership and control on profit rates. Am. Econ. Rev.58(3): 432–447, 1968.
13.
UseemM.Corporations and corporate elite. Annu. Rev. Sociol.6: 41–77, 1980.
14.
ZeitlinM.Corporate ownership and control: The large corporation and the capitalist class. Am. J. Sociol.79: 1073–1119, 1974.
15.
AlfordR. R.FriedlandR.Political participation and public policy. Annu. Rev. Sociol.1: 429–479, 1975.
16.
EcksteinR.Structural Constraint and Social Decision-Making: An Analytical Framework. Unpublished manuscript. State University of New York at Stony Brook, 1986.
17.
LukesS.Power: A Radical View. Macmillan, London, 1974.
18.
PfefferJ.SalancikG.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row, New York, 1978.
19.
AldrichH.Organizations and Environments. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1979.
20.
ThompsonJ. D.Organizations in Action. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.
21.
ThompsonJ. D.McEwanW. J.Organizational goals and environment: Goal setting as an interactive process. Am. Sociol. Rev.23: 23–32, 1958.
22.
StarbuckW. H.Organizational growth and development. In Handbook of Organizations, edited by MarchJ. G., pp. 451–533. Rand McNally, Chicago, 1965.
23.
PfefferJ.Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administr. Sci. Q.17: 218–228, 1972.
24.
SelznickP.TVA and the Grass Roots. Harper Torchbooks, New York, 1966.
25.
MintzB.SchwartzM.Interlocking directorates and interest group formation. Am. Sociol. Rev.46: 851–869, 1981.
26.
DelaneyK. J.Strategic Bankruptcy. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1992.
27.
Why bankers are getting tougher. Business Week, June 22, 1981, p. 70.
28.
GlasbergD. S.Finance capital markets and corporate decision-making processes: The case of W. T. Grant Company's bankruptcy. Sociol. Forum2(2): 305–330, 1987.
29.
O'ConnorJ.Finance capital or corporate capital?Monthly Rev. 20: 30–35, 1968.
30.
O'ConnorJ.Question: Who rules the corporations? Answer: The ruling class. Socialist Revolution7: 117–150, 1972.
31.
ScottJ.Corporations, Classes and Capitalism. Hutchinson University Library, London, 1979.
32.
SweezyP. M.The resurgence of finance capital: Fact or fancy?Socialist Revolution2: 157–190, 1972.
33.
DomhoffG. W.The Higher Circles. Random House, New York, 1970.
34.
DomhoffG. W.Who Rules America Now?Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1983.
35.
HobsonJ. A.Imperialism: A Study. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1905.
36.
LeninV. I.Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism. International Publishers, New York, 1917.
37.
PerloV.The Empire of High Finance. International Publishers, New York, 1957.
38.
RochesterA.Rulers of America: A Study of Finance Capital. International Publishers, New York, 1936.
39.
KotzD. M.Bank Control of Large Corporations in the United States. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1978.
40.
BrandeisL.Other People's Money and How the Bankers Use It. F. A. Stokes Company, 1914.
41.
JosephsonM.The Robber Barons: The Great American Capitalists, 1861–1901. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, New York, 1934.
42.
MoodyJ.The Truth About the Trusts. Moody Publishing Company, New York, 1904.
43.
MoodyJ.The Masters of Capital. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1921.
44.
TrescottP. B.Financing American Enterprise: The Story of Commercial Banking. Harper & Row, New York, 1963.
45.
SweezyP. M.The Theory of Capitalist Development. Oxford University Press, New York, 1942.
46.
U.S. House of Representatives. Commercial Banks and Their Trust Activities: Emerging Influences on the American Economy. Patman Report, Committee on Bank and Currency, Subcommittee on Domestic Finance. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1968.
47.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Institutional Investor Study Report. House Document 92–64. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1971.
48.
WheelerG.Pierpont Morgan and Friends. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1973.
49.
FitchR.OppenheimerM.Who rules the corporations?, Parts I, II and III. Socialist Revolution1(4): 73–108; 1(5): 61–114; 1(6): 33–94, 1970.
50.
LeinsdorfD.EtraD.Citibank. Grossman Publishers, New York, 1973.
51.
LintnerJ.The financing of corporations. In The Corporation in Modern Society, edited by MasonE. S., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1966.
52.
AllenM. P.Management control in the large corporation: Comment on Zeitlin. Am. J. Sociol.81: 885–894, 1976.
53.
KirklandE. C.Men, Cities and Transportation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1948.
54.
MenshikovS.Millionaires and Managers: Structure of the U.S. Financial Oligarchy. Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1969.
55.
RatcliffeR. E.OehleerK.GallopsM.Networks of Financial Power: An Analysis of the Impact of the Internal Structure of the Capitalist Class on the Lending Behavior of Banks. Paper presented to the American Sociological Association, Boston, 1979.
56.
HermanE. S.Do bankers control corporations?Monthly Rev. 25(2): 12–29, 1973.
57.
HermanE. S.Kotz on banker control. Monthly Rev. 31(4): 46–57, 1979.
KnowlesJ. C.The Rockefeller Financial Group. Warner Modular Productions, New York, 1973.
60.
PeltonR.Who really rules America? Highly concentrated capital controls even the largest corporations. Progressive Labor, February 1970, pp. 16–36.
61.
BoswellT. E.KiserE. V.BakerK. A.Recent developments in Marxist theories of ideology. Insurgent Sociologist13(4): 5–22, 1986.
62.
LaclauE.MouffeC.Recasting Marxism: Hegemony and the new political movements. Socialist Rev. 12(6): 91–113, 1982.
63.
SallachD.Class domination and ideological hegemony. Sociol. Q.15: 38–50, 1974.
64.
WilliamsG. A.Gramsci's concepts of egemonia. J. Hist. Ideas21(4): 586–599, 1960.
65.
WrightE. O.Class, Crisis and the State. New Left Books, London, 1978.
66.
MintzB.SchwartzM.The Power Structure of American Business. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1985.
67.
PattersonT.Notes on the historical application of Marxist cultural theory. Science and Society39(3): 257–291, 1975.
68.
RatcliffeR. E.Capitalist class structure and the decline of older industrial cities. Insurgent Sociologist9: 60–74, 1979/80.
69.
RatcliffeR. E.OehlerK.GallopsM.Banks and the command of capital flows: An analysis of capital class structure and mortgage disinvestment in a metropolitan area. In Classes, Conflict and the State, edited by ZeitlinM., pp. 107–132. Winthrop, Cambridge, Mass., 1980.
70.
RatcliffeR. E.GallagherM. E.RatcliffeK. S.The civic involvement of business leaders: An analysis of the influence of economic power and social prominence in the command of civil policy positions. Social Probl. 26: 298–313, 1979.
71.
MizruchiM.The Structure of the American Intercorporate Network, 1904–1974. Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif., 1982.
72.
GlasbergD. S.The Power of Collective Purse Strings: The Effect of Bank Hegemony on Corporations and the State. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1989.
73.
SonquistJ.KoenigT.Studying interrelations between corporations through interlocking directorates. In Power and Hierarchical Control, edited by BurnsT.BuckleyW., Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif., 1978.
74.
BeardenJ.The Board of Directors in Large U.S. Corporations. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology, State University of New York, Stony Brook, 1982.
75.
GlasbergD. S.The role of finance capital and the social construction of corporate crisis. Insurgent Sociologist13(1/2): 39–51, 1985.
76.
GlasbergD. S.Chrysler Corporation's struggle for bailout: The role of the state in finance capitalist society. Res. Polit. Sociol.3: 87–110, 1987.
77.
GogelR. M.Interlocking Directorships and the American Corporate Network. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1977.
78.
GlasbergD. S.Corporate power and control: The case of Leasco Corporation versus Chemical Bank. Social Probl. 29(2): 104–116, 1981.
79.
EcksteinR.DelaneyK. J.Stock Dumping and Stock Accumulating: The Role of Political and Legal Context. Unpublished manuscript. State University of New York, Stony Brook, 1989.
80.
BacharachP.BaratzM.The two faces of power. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev.56: 947–952, 1962.
81.
VermeulenJ. E.BermanD. M.Asbestos companies under fire. Business and Society Rev. 42: 21–25, 1982.
82.
U.S. Senate.The Manville Bankruptcy and the Northern Pipeline Decision. Subcommittee on Courts, Committee on Judiciary. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1982.
83.
BrodeurP.The asbestos industry on trial, Parts I, II, III and IV. New Yorker, June 10, pp. 49–101; June 17, pp. 45–111; June 24, pp. 37–77; July 1, pp. 36–80.
84.
BrodeurP.Outrageous Misconduct: The Asbestos Industry on Trial. Pantheon, New York, 1985.
85.
SelikoffI.Asbestos-associated disease. In Asbestos Litigation, edited by AlcornW., Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, New York, 1982.
86.
Moody's Investor Service. Moody's Industrial Manual. New York, 1982–83.
87.
Asbestos Litigation Group. The Manville bankruptcy: Using Chapter 11 as an escape hatch. Trial, February 1983, pp. 72–73.
88.
U.S. House of Representatives. Oversight Hearings on the Effect of the Manville and UNR Bankruptcies on Compensation of Asbestos Victims. Subcommittee on Labor Standards, Committee on Education and Labor. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1982.
89.
ParkerG. E., Vice President of the Manville Corporation. Statements in Front of the Senate Subcommittee on Courts.
90.
in re Asbestos Insurance Coverage Cases, Nos. 1072 and 765226. Superior Court for State of California in the City and County of San Francisco, March 31, 1980.
91.
in re Johns-Manville Corp. Bankruptcy. Southern District of New York, January 23, 1984.
92.
ParkerG. E., Vice President of the Manville Corporation. Statements before the House Committee on Labor Standards.
CroyleJ. L.Industrial incident liability policy of the early twentieth century. J. Legal Stud. 7(2): 279–297, 1978.
95.
JohnsonW. G.HelerE.Compensation for death from asbestos. Industr. Labor Rel. Rev.37(4): 529–540, 1984.
96.
VanceB. W., Assistant Attorney General for the U.S., Civil Division. Letter to the author, September 25, 1984.
97.
ChenE.Asbestos litigation is a growth industry. The Atlantic25(2): 24–32, 1984.
98.
CopelandR. M.DascherP. E.DavisonD. L.Financial Accounting. Wiley, New York, 1980.
99.
CastlemanB.How the asbestos industry avoids its victims. Business and Society Rev. 31: 33–38, 1979.
100.
U.S. Code Congressional and Administrative News. Senate Report on Bankruptcy Code. U.S. Code Congressional and Administrative News, Nos. 5787 and 5808. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1978.
101.
U.S. Code Congressional and Administrative News. House Report on Bankruptcy Code, U.S. Congressional and Administrative News, No. 6266. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1978.
102.
U.S. Code.Title 11. Bankruptcy.
103.
DelaneyK. J.Power, Intercorporate Networks and “Strategic Bankruptcy.”Law and Society Rev. 23(4), 1989.
104.
Epidemiological Resources, Inc. Report. 1984. [Introduced during in re Johns-Manville Corp.]
105.
RoeM. J.Bankruptcy and mass tort. Columbia Law Rev. 84: 846–922, 1984.
106.
Manville's new leadership. Business Week, May 12, 1986, p. 36.
107.
Now comes the hard part for Manville. Business Week, July 7, 1986, pp. 76–77.
108.
Manville shift aids creditors. New York Times, April 23, 1986, p. D5.
109.
Corporate Data Exchange, Inc. Stock Ownership Directory: Fortune 500. New York, 1981.
110.
Saying no to shopping for yes-man CPA's. Business Week, May 13, 1985, pp. 128–130.
111.
Savings industry upset by accounting proposal. New York Times, July 17, 1986, p. D2.
112.
Accountants held accountable. Newsday, April 21, 1985, p. 100.
113.
Who will audit the auditors?Newsweek, December 3, 1984, p. 72.
114.
DelaneyK. J.The Manville Corporation and Mass-Tort Bankruptcy: Legal Accommodation of Corporate Interest. Presented to the Eastern Sociological Society, Philadelphia, 1985.
