During the last several decades, Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) has become a widely used technique in public policy-making. This review examines CBA from perspectives of both advocates and critics; it looks at its theory and practice, its purported advantages and shortcomings in application. It also proposes several ways in which the process can be made more accountable.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BodenL., CBA: Caveat Emptor, Editorial, American Journal of Public Health, 69(12), 1979.
MintzB. W., OSHA History, Law, and Policy, The Bureau of National Affairs Inc., Washington, D.C., p. 322, 1984.
5.
StokeyE. and ZeckhauserR., A Primer for Policy Analysis, W. W.Norton & Co., 1978.
6.
Economic Analysis of Federal Regulations Under Executive Order 12866, Executive Office of the President, p. 24, 1996.
7.
TicknerJ. A., ERF, 1994, as cited in Hazardous Exports: The U.S. Transfer of Risk Assessment to Central and Eastern Europe, New Solutions, 6(4), p. 6, Summer 1996.
8.
GilletteC. P. and HopkinsT. D., “Federal Agency Valuations of Human Life,” A Report to the Administrative Conference of the U.S., pp. 50, 51, April 1988.
9.
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Wonder Tool or Mirage? Report Together with Minority Views by the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, p. 23, 1980.
10.
GilletteC. P. and HopkinsT. D., “Federal Agency Valuations of Human Life,” A Report to the Administrative Conference of the U.S., p. 56, April 1988.
11.
TravisC. C.RichterS. A.CrouchE. A. C., and WilsonR. (eds.), Cancer Risk Management: A Review of 132 Federal Regulatory Decisions, 21 Environmental Science and Technology (1987) as cited in GilletteC. P. and HopkinsT. D., “Federal Agency Valuations of Human Life,” A Report to the Administrative Conference of the U.S., p. 2, April 1988.
12.
GilletteC. P. and HopkinsT. D., “Federal Agency Valuations of Human Life,” A Report to the Administrative Conference of the U.S., p. 12, April 1988.
13.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, The Economic Cost to Society of Motor Vehicle Accidents 1–2, DOT HS 806342, January 1983 as cited in GilletteC. P. and HopkinsT. D.. “Federal Agency Valuations of Human Life,” A Report to the Administrative Conference of the U.S., p. 28, April 1988.
14.
BroderJ. M., Big Social Changes Revive the False God of Numbers, The New York Times, Section 4, Page 1, August 17, 1997.
15.
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Wonder Tool or Mirage? Report Together with Minority Views by the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, p. 20, 1980.
16.
CommonerB., The Closing Circle, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, pp. 205, 206, 1971.
17.
StevensW. K., How Much Is Nature Worth? For You, $33 Trillion, The New York Times, p. C1, May 20, 1997.
18.
GilletteC. P. and HopkinsT. D., “Federal Agency Valuations of Human Life,” A Report to the Administrative Conference of the U.S., p. 38, April 1988.
19.
StallworthH., The Cost-Benefit Paradigm for Environmental Protection: An Economist's Perspective on Methodological, Theoretical, and Ethical Problems, New Solutions, 6(1), p. 14, 1996.
20.
StallworthH., The Economics of Environmental Decision-Making, New Solutions, 7(1), p. 12, 1997.
21.
Congressional Budget Office, Regulatory Impact Analysis: Costs at Selected Agencies and Implications for the Legislative Process, Washington, D.C., pp. 13, 14, 1997.
22.
Congressional Budget Office, Regulatory Impact Analysis: Costs at Selected Agencies and Implications for the Legislative Process, Washington, D.C., pp. 39–46, 1997.
23.
AshfordN. and CaldartC. C., Technology, Law and the Working Environment (Revised Edition), Island Press, Washington, D.C., p. 256, 1996.
24.
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Health/Pac Bulletin, 11(6), p. 12, July/August 1980, Health Policy Advisory Center.
