This quantitative study compared 19 cohort and 27 non-cohort graduate students' perceptions of the ethical climate of an educational administration program at a midwestern metropolitan university using the Ethical Climate Index (ECI). In addition, the study investigated graduate student perceptions of the importance of the ethical climate in the retention of students within academic programs. The results of the study indicated that cohort students rated the ethical climate significantly more positive than non-cohort students on two of the three ECI subscales: student to faculty and student to student. Both cohort and non-cohort students perceived the ethical climate as an important factor in the retention of students within academic programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchillesC. M. (1994). Searching for the golden fleece: The epic struggle continues. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30 (1), 6–26.
2.
BarnettB. G.BasomM. R.YerkesD. M., & NorrisC. J. (2000). Cohorts in educational leadership programs: Benefits, difficulties, and the potential for developing school leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36 (2), 255–282.
3.
BarnettB. G., & MuseI. D. (1993). Cohort groups in educational administration: Promises and challenges. Journal of School Leadership, 3, 400–415.
4.
BratlienM. J.GenzerS. M.HoyleJ. R., & OatesA. D. (1992). The professional studies doctorate: Leaders for learning. Journal of School Leadership, 2, 75–89.
5.
BrownR. D., & KragerL. (1985). Ethical issues in graduate education: Faculty and student responsibilities. Journal of Higher Education, 56 (4), 403–418.
6.
BurnettP. C. (1999). The supervision of doctoral dissertations using a collaborative cohort model. Counselor Education and Supervision, 39 (1), 46–52.
7.
CunninghamP. (1996). Ideological space makers: The need in graduate programs in adult education. International Adult & Continuing Education Conference. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 401 415.)
8.
HillM. S. (1995). Educational leadership cohort models: Changing the talk to change the walk. Planning and Changing, 26 (3/4), 179–189.
9.
KastenK. L. (1992, October). Students' perceptions of the cohort model of instructional delivery. Paper presented at the annual convention of the University Council for Educational Administration, Minneapolis, MN.
10.
KipnisD. (1976). The powerholders. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
11.
KitchenerK. S. (1984). Intuition, critical evaluation and ethical principles: The foundation for ethical decisions in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 12 (3), 43–55.
12.
KitchenerK.S. (1985). Ethical principles and ethical decisions in student affairs. In CanonH. J. & BrownR. D. (Eds.), New directions for student services: Applied ethics in student services (pp. 17–29). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
NorrisC.BarnettB.BasomM., & YerkesD. (1996). The cohort: A vehicle for building transformational leadership skills. Planning and Changing, 27 (3/4), 145–164.
14.
SchulteL. E. (2001). Graduate education faculty and student perceptions of the ethical climate and its importance in the retention of students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, and Practice, 3 (2), 119–136.
15.
SchulteL. E.BrownR. D., & WiseS. L. (1991). The development and validation of the ethical climate index for graduate and professional school programs. Research in Higher Education, 32 (4), 479–498.
16.
TeitelL. (1997). Understanding and harnessing the power of the cohort model in preparing educational leaders. Peabody Journal of Education, 72 (2), 66–85.
17.
WehlageG. G.RutterR. A.SmithG. A.LeskoN., & FernandezR. R. (1989). Reducing the risk: Schools as communities of support. New York: Falmer Press.
18.
WitteJ. E., & JamesW. B. (1998). Cohort partnerships: A pragmatic approach to doctoral research. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 79, 53–62.
