While Locus of Control is typically operationalized as a single dispositional trait that generalizes across settings, it has also been conceptualized as two weakly related factors; Domain-Specific State Locus of Control and a generalized Trait Locus of Control. Malleability of these two factors was tested for recently widowed older adults in self-help support groups (n = 17) and a waiting-list control condition (n = 6). Domain-Specific State Locus of Control—Desire for Control subscale increased over the course of the three-week six-session intervention for support group participants. These group participants also showed decreased psychological distress from pre to post intervention. The change in Domain-Specific State Locus of Control—Desire for Control did not relate to this reduction in distress. As expected, Trait Locus of Control remained stable with greater Trait Internality related to less psychological symptomatology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FolkmanS., Personal Control and Stress and Coping Process: A Theoretical Analysis, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, pp. 839–852, 1984.
2.
LangerE. J. and RodinJ., The Effects of Choice and Enhanced Personal Responsibility for the Aged: A Field Experiment in an Institutional Setting, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, pp. 191–198, 1976.
3.
LefcourtH. M., Locus of Control: Current Trends in Theory and Research (2nd Edition), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1982.
4.
LefcourtH. M., Durability and Impact of the Locus of Control Construct, Psychological Bulletin, 112, pp. 411–414, 1992.
5.
RotterJ. B., Some Problems and Misconceptions Related to the Construct of Internal versus External Control of Reinforcement, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, pp. 56–67, 1966.
6.
WeisenbergM., Pain and Pain Control, Psychological Review, 84, pp. 1008–1044, 1977.
7.
Haas-HawkingsG.SangsterS.ZieglerM., and ReidD., A Study of Relatively Immediate Adjustment to Widow-Hood in Later Life, International Journal of Women's Studies, 8, pp. 158–166, 1985.
8.
MartinD. J.AbramsonL. Y., and AlloyL. B., Illusion of Control for Self and Others in Depressed and Nondepressed College Students, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, pp. 125–136, 1984.
9.
AbelB. and HayslipB., Locus of Control and Retirement Preparation, Journal of Gerontology, 42, pp. 165–167, 1987.
10.
LachmanM. E., Locus of Control in Aging Research: A Case for Multidimensional and Domain-Specific Assessment, Psychology and Aging, 1, pp. 34–40, 1986.
11.
RobertsM. L. and NesselroadeJ. R., Intraindividual Variability in Perceived Locus of Control in Adults: P-Technique Factor Analyses of Short-Term Change, Journal of Research in Personality, 20, pp. 529–545, 1986.
12.
ThompsonS. C. and SpacapanS., Perceptions of Control in Vulnerable Populations, Journal of Social Issues, 47, pp. 1–21, 1991.
13.
ZieglerM. and ReidD., Correlates of Locus of Desired Control in Two Samples of Elderly Persons: Community Residents and Hospitalized Patients, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, pp. 977–979, 1979.
14.
KrauseN., Stress and Coping: Reconceptualizing the Role of Locus of Control Belief, Journal of Gerontology, 41, pp. 617–622, 1986.
15.
ReichJ. W. and ZautraA. J., Dispositional Control Beliefs and the Consequences of a Control-Enhancing Intervention, Journal of Gerontology, 45, pp. P46–P51, 1990.
16.
Janoff-BulmanR. and FriezeI. H., A Theoretical Perspective for Understanding Reactions to Victimization, Journal of Social Issues, 39, pp. 1–17, 1983.
17.
KohnM. L. and SchoolerC., Job Conditions and Personality: A Longitudinal Assessment of their Reciprocal Effects, American Journal of Sociology, 87, pp. 1257–1287, 1982.
18.
LarsonR., Is Feeling “In Control” Related to Happiness in Daily Life?Psychological Reports, 64, pp. 775–784, 1989.
19.
ReidD. and ZieglerM., Validity and Stability of a New Desired Control Measure Pertaining to Psychological Adjustment of the Elderly, Journal of Gerontology, 35, pp. 395–402, 1980.
20.
StroebeW.StroebeM. S., and DomittnerG., Individual and Situational Differences in Recovery from Bereavement: A Risk Group Identified, Journal of Social Issues, 44, pp. 143–158, 1988.
21.
GeorgeL. K., Role Transitions in Later Life, Brooks Cole, Monterey, California, 1980.
22.
ReichJ. W. and ZautraA. J., A Perceived Control Intervention for At-Risk Older Adults, Psychology and Aging, 4, pp. 415–424, 1989.
23.
LachmanM. E., Perceived Control over Memory Aging: Developmental and Intervention Perspectives, Journal of Social Issues, 47, pp. 157–175, 1991.
24.
SchulzR.HeckhausenJ., and LocherJ. L., Adult Development, Control and Adaptive Functioning, Journal of Social Issues, 47, pp. 177–196, 1991.
25.
GuarnacciaC. A. and ZautraA. J., The Impact of Ordinary Major and Small Negative Life Events on Older Adults, in Aging and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, RuskinP. E. and TalbottJ. A. (eds.), American Psychiatric Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 139–161, 1996.
26.
GuarnacciaC. A. and HayslipB., Use of Clinical Training and Supervision in Community Based Self-Help Groups for Widowed Older Adults, Faculty Research Grant, University of North Texas, Denton, 1992.
27.
McDonaldP. A. and HaneyM., Counseling the Older Adult: A Training Manual in Clinical Gerontology (2nd Edition), Lexington, New York, 1988.
28.
CollinsB. E., Four Components of the Rotter Internal-External Scale: Belief in a Difficult World, A Just World, A Predictable World, and A Politically Responsive World, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, pp. 381–391, 1974.
29.
DerogatisL. R. and SpencerP. M., The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI): Administration & Procedures Manual—I, Clinical Psychometric Research, Towson, Maryland, 1982.
30.
KrauseN. and StrykerS., Stress and Well-Being: The Buffering Role of Locus of Control Beliefs, Social Science and Medicine, 18, pp. 783–790, 1984.
