Do Welfare Regimes Mediate the Effect of Socioeconomic Position on Health in Adolescence? A Cross-National Comparison in Europe,North America,and Israel
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2006
Do Welfare Regimes Mediate the Effect of Socioeconomic Position on Health in Adolescence? A Cross-National Comparison in Europe,North America,and Israel
This article examines whether different types of welfare states mediate the effect of socioeconomic position on adolescents' health. The authors' main hypothesis is that countries with stronger redistributive policies will be more effective in weakening the association between socioeconomic position and health, thus reducing health inequalities. Analyses were carried out for Israel and 32 countries of Europe and North America. Data in the 2001–2002 Health Behavior in School-aged Children survey were collected through self-administered questionnaires distributed in schools to boys and girls 11, 13, and 15 years old. Socioeconomic position was measured with the Family Affluence Scale, based on reported consumption in the family. Health indicators were perceived health, general well-being, symptom load, and health behaviors. Social welfare regimes were classified using an expanded Esping-Andersen classification. The analysis supports the authors' hypothesis, at least partially. Social democratic and conservative welfare regimes rank lowest in the strength of association between low socioeconomic position and poor health, followed by liberal and other regime types, but it is more difficult to interpret data from Mediterranean and post-communist countries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KawachiI., and KennedyB. P.Health and social cohesion: Why care about income distribution. BMJ314: 1037–1040, 1997.
2.
KawachiI.Social capital, income and inequality. Am. J. Public Health87: 1491–1498, 1997.
3.
NavarroV. (ed.). The Political Economy of Social Inequalities: Consequences for Health and Quality of Life. Baywood, Amityville, NY, 2002.
4.
WaldmannR.Income distribution and infant mortality. Q. J. Econ.107: 1283–1302, 1992.
5.
KennedyB. P.KawachiI., and Prothrow-StithD.Income distribution and mortality: A cross sectional ecological study of the Robin Hood index in the United States. BMJ312: 1004–1007, 1998.
6.
Mackenbach J., and the E.U.Working Group on Socio-economic Inequalities in Health. Socio-economic inequalities in morbidity in western Europe. Lancet349: 1655–1659, 1997.
7.
AdelsteinA. M.Life-style in occupational cancer. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health.6: 953–962, 1980.
8.
MarmotM. G.Health inequalities among British civil servants: The Whitehall II study. Lancet337: 1387–1393, 1991.
9.
BoyceW., and DallagoL.Socioeconomic inequalities. In Young People's Health in Context, ed. CurrieC.World Health Organization, Copenhagen, 2004.
10.
AtkinsonA. B.RainwaterL., and SmeedingT. M.Income Distribution in OECD Countries. Social Policy Studies No. 18. OECD, Paris, 1995.
11.
NotburgaO., and WagnerG. G. (eds.). Income Inequality and Poverty in Eastern and Western Europe. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1997.
12.
OffeC.Varieties of Transition: The East European and East German Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1997.
13.
BorrellC.Social class and self-reported health status among men and women: What is the role of work organisation, household material standards and household labour?Soc. Sci. Med.98: 1869–1887, 2004.
14.
NavarroV.The world health situation. Int. J. Health Serv. 34: 1–10, 2004.
15.
WadeR. H.Is globalization reducing poverty and inequality?Int. J. Health Serv. 34: 381–414, 2004.
16.
GoodmanE.The role of socioeconomic status gradients in explaining differences in US adolescents' health. Am. J. Public Health89: 1522–1528, 1999.
17.
HalldorssonM.Socio-economic inequalities in the health of children and adolescents—A comparative study of the five Nordic Countries. Eur. J. Public Health10: 281–288, 2000.
18.
BarreraM.Pathways from family economic conditions to adolescents' distress: Supportive parenting, stressors outside the family, and deviant peers. Community Psychol. 30: 135–152, 2002.
19.
MacIntyreS., and WestP.Lack of class variation in health in adolescence: An artefact of an occupational measure of social class?Soc. Sci. Med.32: 385–402, 1991.
20.
WestP.Health inequalities in the early years: Is there equalisation in youth?Soc. Sci. Med.40: 1283–1302, 1997.
21.
DuncanG.Brooks-GunnJ., and KlebanovP.Economic deprivation and early childhood development. Child Dev. 65: 296–318, 1994.
22.
JensenB., and JensenB. B.Adolescents' Views on Health, Inequality in Health and Action for Health. Ministry of Interior and Health of Denmark, Copenhagen, 2002.
23.
Backett-MilburnK.Cunningham-BurleyS., and DavisJ.Contrasting lives, contrasting views? Understandings of health inequalities from children in differing social circumstances. Soc. Sci. Med.57: 613–623, 2003.
24.
EllisonG. T.Letting Gini out of the bottle? Challenges facing the relative income hypothesis. Soc. Sci. Med.54: 561–576, 2002.
25.
World Health Organization.The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Geneva, 1986.
26.
ShiL.Primary care, self-rated health, and reductions in social disparities in health. Health Serv. Res.37: 529–550, 2002.
27.
MaCinkoJ. A.ShiL., and StarfieldB.Wage inequality, the health system, and infant mortality in wealthy industrialized countries, 1970–1996. Soc. Sci. Med.58: 279–292, 2004.
28.
ShiL.Primary care, income inequality, and stroke mortality in the United States: A longitudinal analysis, 1985–1995. Stroke34: 1958–1964, 2003.
29.
MaCkenbachJ. P.An analysis of the role of health care in reducing socioeconomic inequalities in health: The case of the Netherlands. Int. J. Health Serv. 33: 523–541, 2003.
30.
DoranT., and WhiteheadM.Do social policies and political context matter for health in the United Kingdom?Int. J. Health Serv. 33: 495–522, 2003.
31.
YngweM. A.The role of income differences in explaining social inequalities in self rated health in Sweden and Britain. J. Epidemiol. Community Health55: 556–561, 2001.
32.
BurstromB.Inequality in the social consequences of illness: How well do people with long-term illness fare in the British and Swedish labor markets?Int. J. Health Serv. 30: 435–451, 2000.
33.
NavarroV.The importance of the political and the social in explaining mortality differentials among the countries of the OECD, 1950–1998. Int. J. Health Serv. 33: 419–494, 2003.
34.
NavarroV., and ShiL.The political context of social inequalities and health. Soc. Sci. Med.52: 481–491, 2001.
35.
Esping-AndersenG.The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Polity Press, Cambridge, 1990.
36.
LewisJ. (ed.). Gender, Social Care and Welfare State Restructuring in Europe. Ashgate, London, 1998.
37.
SaracenoC.Family change, family policies and the restructuring of welfare. In OECD, Family, Market and Community, pp. 81–100. Social Policy Studies 21. OECD, Paris, 1997.
38.
KorpiW.Faces of inequality: Gender, class, and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states. Soc. Polit.7: 127–191, 2000.
39.
Pfau-EffingerB.Changing welfare states and labour markets in the context of European gender arrangements. In Changing Labour Markets, Welfare Policies and Citizenship. Gender Group Working Paper. Centre for Comparative Welfare State Studies of Aalborg University, Denmark, 2000. www.socsci.auc.dk/cost/gender/workingpapers.html.
40.
OrloffA. S.Gender equality, women's employment: Cross-national patterns of policy and politics. In Acts of the Meeting of the International Sociological Association Research Committee 19, Poverty, Social Welfare and Social Policy “Old and New Social Inequalities: What Challenges for Welfare States?”University of Oviedo, Spain, September 6–9, 2001.
41.
WalbyS.From gendered welfare state to gender regimes: National differences, convergence, or re-structuring? In Acts of the Meeting of the Gender and Society Group. Stockholm University, January 2001.
42.
LeiseringL., and LeibfriedS.Time and Poverty in Western Welfare States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.
43.
GoughI.Social assistance in OECD countries. J. Eur. Soc. Policy.7: 17–43, 1997.
44.
CrouchC.Social Change in Western Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999.
45.
GallieD., and PaugamS. (eds.). Welfare Regimes and the Experience of Unemployment in Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.
46.
FerreraM.Modelli di solidarietà. Il Mulino, Bologna, 1993.
47.
GonzalezM. J.JuradoT., and NaldiniM.Gender Inequalities in Southern Europe: Women, Work and Welfare in the 1990s. Frank Cass, London, 2000.
48.
RhodesM. (ed.). Southern European Welfare States: Between Crisis and Reform. Frank Cass, London, 1997.
49.
CurrieC. (eds.). Young People's Health in Context—Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) Study: International Report from the 2001/2002 Survey. Health Policy for Children and Adolescents, No. 4. World Health Organization, Copenhagen, 2004.
50.
CurrieC. E.Indicators of socioeconomic status for adolescents: The WHO Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Survey. Health Educ. Res.12: 385–397, 1997.
51.
BurstroemB., and FredlundP.Self rated health: Is it as good a predictor of subsequent mortality among adults in lower as well as in higher social classes?Community Health55: 836–840, 2001.
52.
CantrilH.The Pattern of Human Concern. Rutgers, London, 1965.
53.
GalJ.Decommodification and beyond: A comparative analysis of work-injury programmes. J. Eur. Soc. Policy.14: 55–69, 2004.
54.
DoronA.Social welfare policy in Israel: Developments in the 1980s and 1990s (in Israel Affairs). Frank Cass J.7(4), 2001.
55.
EbbinghausB.European Labour Relations and Welfare State Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of Their “Elective Affinities.” Background paper presented at the conference Varieties of Welfare Capitalism in Europe, North America and Japan, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, June 11–13, 1998.
56.
ZborowskiM.People in Pain. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1969.
57.
LetablierM. T.Comparing Family Policies in Europe. Periodic Progress Report No. 1 of the Thematic Network, Working and Mothering: Social Practices and Social Policies, TSER Programme of the European Commission, Area III: Research into Social Integration and Social Exclusion in Europe, 1st TSER Seminar, Lund, November 26–28, 1998.
58.
TrifilettiR.Comments on “Comparing Family Policies in Europe,” Periodic Progress Report No. 1 of the Thematic Network, Working and Mothering: Social Practices and Social Policies, TSER Programme of the European Commission, Area III: Research into Social Integration and Social Exclusion in Europe, 1st TSER Seminar, Lund, November 26–28, 1998.
59.
OrloffA. S.Gender Equality, Women's Employment: Cross-national Patterns of Policy and Politics. Paper presented at the meeting Poverty, Social Welfare and Social Policy, “Old and New Social Inequalities: What Challenges for Welfare States?” International Sociological Association Research Committee 19, University of Oviedo, Spain, September 6–9, 2001.
60.
RoosL. L.Socioeconomic determinants of mortality in two Canadian provinces: Multilevel modelling and neighbourhood context. Soc. Sci. Med.59: 1435–1447, 2004.
61.
Esping-AndersenG.Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999.
62.
NavarroV.Neoliberalism, “globalization,” unemployment, inequalities, and the welfare state. In The Political Economy of Social Inequalities, ed. NavarroV.. Baywood, Amityville, NY, 2002.
63.
NavarroV.SchmittJ., and AstudilloJ.Is globalization undermining the welfare state? The evolution of the welfare state in developed capitalist countries during the 1990s. Int. J. Health Serv. 34: 185–227, 2004.
