The primary purpose of this investigation was to identify the facilitators and inhibitors for the use of computer-assisted instruction (CAI), and to prioritize their relative importance as they were perceived by university faculty. The secondary purpose was to examine differences between the perceptions of education and business faculties and to detect possible interactions among a set of independent variables. For these purposes a survey questionnaire was designed and administered to the faculty of Nanyang Technological University (NTU) in Singapore. The results obtained from sixty-two responding faculty indicated that the two most important facilitators were teachers' knowledge and skills in CAI technology, and the availability of hardware and software. The lack of teachers' time, and the lack of technical support were the two most important inhibitors. Some significant differences were detected between the perceptions of education and business faculties.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MarcinkiewiczH. R., Computer and Teachers: Factors Influencing Computer Use in the Classroom, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26: 2, pp. 220–237, 1993–1994.
2.
National Computer Board [NCB], A Vision of an Intelligent Island: The IT2000, Singapore National Printers, Singapore, 1992.
3.
HuR. and HoonP. M., Student's and Teacher's Workbench, Information Technology—Journal of the Singapore Computer Society, 6: 1, pp. 91–96, 1994.
4.
BarkerP., Computer Assisted Learning in Singapore, British Journal of Educational Technology, 19: 3, pp. 193–201, 1988.
5.
YipS. K. and SimW. K., Evolution of Educational Excellence: 25 Years of Education in the Republic of Singapore, Longman Singapore, Singapore, 1990.
6.
OngS. T. and Lee-LeckM. K., The Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Attitudes and Achievement in Mathematics on Pre-Service Primary School Teachers, in Selected Proceedings of Educomp '86: Impact of Microcomputers in Education—Issues and Techniques, YongY. C.LoyW. S., and LeeC. K. (eds.), Ngee Ann Polytechnic, Singapore, pp. 196–201, 1986.
7.
KowK. G., Investigation of Various Modes of Computer-Based Learning for Secondary Schools, Singapore Journal of Education, 9: 2, pp. 27–32, 1988.
8.
Woo—TanL. B., Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on the Learning of Transformation Geometry, unpublished master's dissertation, National University of Singapore, 1989.
9.
FraserB. J. and FraserG. P. L.The, Effect Sizes Associated with Micro-Prolog-Based Computer-Assisted Learning, Computer Education, 23: 3, pp. 187–196, 1994.
10.
CoxM.RhodesV., and HallJ., The Use of Computer-Assisted Learning in Primary Schools: Some Factors Affecting the Uptake, Computer Education, 12: 1, pp. 173–178, 1988.
11.
PressL., Technotronics Education: Answers on the Cultural Horizon, Communications of the ACM, 36, pp. 17–22, 1993.
12.
TalisayonV. M., Preparing ASEAN for the Information Century: A Comparative Study of Policies and Programs on Computers in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Philippines Press, 1990.
13.
SmithT. W. and YellenR. E., Factors Inhibiting the Introduction of Computer-Assisted Instruction, COLLEGIATE MICROCOMPUTER, 9: 2, pp. 117–122, 1991.
14.
WildP., The Effectiveness of Inset in CAL and IT: An Evaluation of the Work of an Advisory Teacher, Computer Education, 17: 4, pp. 289–300.
15.
BraithwaiteB. A., Computer Education for Teachers: A Maze of Realities, Microcomputer Applications in Education and Training for Developing Countries: Proceedings of a Meeting on the Use of Microcomputers for Developing Countries, Westview Press, London, 1987.
16.
D'AmicoJ. J., Three Lessons I Learned from a Year of Computer-Based Instruction, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 17: 3, pp. 103–109, 1990.
17.
DupagneM. and KrendlK., Teachers' Attitudes toward Computers: A Review of the Literature, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24: 3, pp. 420–429, 1992.
18.
ElyD. P., Conditions that Facilitate the Implementation of Education Technology Innovations, Journal for Research on Computers in Education, 23: 2, pp. 298–305.
19.
PosnerB.DanielsonR. L., and PosnerJ. S., Factors in the Adoption and Use of an Electronic Communication System for MBA Students, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 21: 1, pp. 5–19, 1992–1993.
20.
WildP., The Effectiveness of Inset in CAL and IT: An Evaluation of the Work of an Advisory Teacher, Computer Education, 16: 4, pp. 289–300, 1991.
21.
ChinS. S-F. and HortinJ. A., Teachers' Perceptions of Instructional Technology and Staff Development, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 22: 2, pp. 83–98, 1994.
22.
ClarkB. and GrantR., Implementing Computer Technology in Educational Settings, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 19: 4, pp. 313–326, 1990–1991.
23.
LowtherD. and SullivanH., Teacher and Technologist Beliefs about Educational Technology, ETR&D, 42: 4, pp. 73–87, 1994.
24.
HammondN.GardnerN.HeathS.KibbyM.MayesT.McAleeseR.MullingsC., and TrappA., Blocks to the Effective Use of Information Technology in Higher Education, Computer Education, 18: 1, pp. 155–162, 1992.
25.
LeiblumM. D., Implementing CAL at a University, Computer Education, 18: 1–3, pp. 109–118, 1992.
26.
HammondM. F., It's More than Just Computers—Widening the Field, Conference on New Tools and Devices in Education, Mathematics, and Science Center, Ngee Ann Polytechnic, 1989.
27.
CollisB. A.Ji-PingZ., and StanchevI., Investigating Cross-National Educational Software Portability: The Case of Electronic Workbenches, ETTI, 31: 1, pp. 44–58, 1994.
28.
RosenbergR., Debunking Computer Literacy, Technology Review, 94: 1, pp. 58–65, January 1992.
29.
SheingoldK. and HadleyM., Accomplished Teachers: Integrating Computers into Classroom Practice, Bank Street of College Education, Center for Technology in Education, New York, 1990.
30.
AbtanP., It's Time for Technology to Reach the Educational World, Computing Canada, 16: 18, pp. 35–44, 1990.
31.
PlompT.PelgrumW. J., and SteernemanH. M., Influence of Computer Use on Schools' Curriculum: Limited Integration, Computer Education, 14: 2, pp. 159–171, 1990.
32.
DynanM. B., Evaluation of Implementation of Curriculum Innovations, in Educational Evaluation for Program Improvement, RyanA. S. and FraserB. J. (eds.), 1984.
WinnansC. and BrownD. S., Some Factors Affecting Elementary Teachers' Use of the Computer, Computers Education, 18: 4, pp. 301–309, 1992.
35.
NelsonR. B. and ErwinT. D., Examining the Organizational Characteristics of CAI Projects in Institutions of Higher Learning, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 14: 4, pp. 297–305, 1985–86.
36.
BransunD., Educators Used Support to Make Commuting Meaningful, Macworld, pp. 83–88, September 1992.
37.
DunkelP. A., Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) and Computer-Based Language Learning (CALL): Past Dilemmas and Future Prospects for Audible CALL, The Modern Language Journal, 71: 3, pp. 250–260, 1987.
38.
McCarthyR., Making the Future Work: The Road to Curriculum Integration, Electronic Learning, pp. 42–46, September 1988.
39.
SalomonG., The Computer Lab: A Bad Idea Now Sanctified, Educational Technology, 30: 10, pp. 50–52, 1990.
40.
SantiagoR. S., Japan: Meeting the Challenge of Computers in Education, EastmandN. (ed.), ETR&D, 41: 4, pp. 111–118, 1993.
41.
MacKowiakK., The Effects of Faculty Characteristics on Computer Applications in Instruction, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23: 3, pp. 396–410, 1990–1991.
42.
WeiC-L., Instructional Uses of Computers in Boys', Girls', and Coeducational Senior High Schools in Taiwan, the Republic of China, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 20: 1, pp. 15–20, 1993.
43.
McDonoughD.StrivensJ., and RadaR., University Courseware Development: Comparative Views of Computer-Based Teaching by Users and Non-Users, Computers & Education, 23: 3, pp. 211–220, 1994.
44.
Scottish Education Department [SED], Microcomputers and Secondary Teaching: Implications for Teacher Education, a report on an international seminar arranged by the Scottish Education Department in cooperation with the OECD, Paris, 1988.
45.
JohnstonV. M., The Evaluation of Microcomputer Programs: An Area of Debate, Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 13: 1, pp. 8–17, 1987.
46.
KlueverR. C.LamT. C. M.HoffmanE. R.GreenK. E., and SwearingenD. L., The Computer Attitude Scale: Assessing Changes in Teachers' Attitudes toward Computers, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11: 3, pp. 251–261, 1994.
47.
SpottsT. H. and BowmanM. A., Increasing Faculty Use of Instructional Technology: Barriers and Incentives, Educational Media International [EMI], 30: 4, pp. 199–204, 1993.
48.
KirkD., Gender Issues in Information Technology as Found in Schools: Authentic/Synthetic/Fantastic?Educational Technology, pp. 28–31, April 1992.
49.
JuskaA. and ParisA. E., Students Computer Use: Its Organizational Structure and Institutional Support, COLLEGIATE MICROCOMPUTER, 11: 2, pp. 42–50, 1993.
50.
BarkerD. I., A Technological Revolution in Higher Education, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 23: 2, pp. 155–168, 1994–1995.
51.
DavidsonC. and TomicA., Removing Computer Phobia from the Writing Classroom, ELT Journal, 48: 3, pp. 205–336, 1994.
52.
HartleyJ. R., The Innovation of Computer-Assisted Learning, British Journal of Educational Technology, 18: 3, pp. 210–220, 1987.
53.
KingW. R. and TeoT. S. H., Facilitator and Inhibitors for the Strategic Use of Information Technology, Information & Management, 27, pp. 71–87, 1994.
54.
PillerC., Separate Realities, Macworld, 9: 9, pp. 218–231, 1992.
55.
SheldonE. J., CAI/Multimedia Approach to Farm Tractor and Machinery Safety Certification, unpublished doctor's dissertation, Purdue University, Indiana, 1995.
56.
SponderB. and HilgenfeldR. M., Research in Instructional Technology at the National Institute of Education, Singapore, ETR&D, 41: 4, pp. 115–118, 1993.
57.
TinkerR. F., Educational Software Development Strategies for Developing Countries, Proceedings of a Meeting on the Use of Microcomputers for Developing Countries, Westview Press, London, 1987.
58.
WildavskyA., Education in the Computer Age: Issues of Policy, Practice and Reform, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills/London/New Delhi, 1983.
