Partial results from a larger Finnish-Polish study on the relations between grandchildren, parents, and grandparents are presented here. The results are based on a content analysis of essays written by 731 Finnish and Polish adolescents between eleven and twenty-one. Older children used more abstract descriptions, girls mentioned more personality features and feelings than boys, and grandmothers, especially maternal grandmothers were described in the most positive terms. The central new finding was that there are highly significant cross-cultural differences in the descriptions of grandparents: the Poles describe them in more abstract terms even after controlling for age and gender. Polish adolescents make more mention of their feelings, their personality, and their skills as well as of emotional/intellectual input from them; they use more positive terms than do the Finns, but make less mention of activities and appearance. These differences between the two cultures are mediated by contact frequency, which through its working on the proximal level enables co-construction of the relationship and the transmission of interactional styles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
EisenbergA. R., Grandchildren's Perspectives on Relationships with Grandparents: The Influence of Gender Across Generations, Sex Roles, 19:3/4, pp. 205–217, 1983.
2.
RobertoK. A. and StroesJ., Grandchildren and Grandparents: Roles, Influences, and Relationships, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 34:4, pp. 227–239, 1992.
3.
HurmeH. E., Isoäiti kaksitoistavuotiaan kuvaamana (The Grandmother in Descriptions of 12-Year-Olds), Reports from the Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, 285, 1986.
4.
HurmeH. E., Children's Conceptions of Old People, Rocznik socjologii rodziny (Annual of Family Psychology, Poland), IV, pp. 161–170, 1992.
5.
HodgsonL., Adult Grandchildren and Their Grandparents: The Enduring Bond, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 34:3, pp. 209–225, 1992.
6.
KennedyG. E., Quality in Grandparent-Grandchild Relationships, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 35:2, pp. 83–98, 1992.
7.
CherlinA. and FurstenbergF. F., Styles and Strategies of Grandparenting, in Grandparenthood, BengtsonV. L. and RobertsonJ. F. (eds.), Sage, Beverly Hills, 1985.
8.
DelestreA., Grands-Parents et Petits-Enfants Ajourd—Hui, Presses Universitaires de Nancy, Nancy, 1991.
9.
KennedyG. E., College Students' Expectations of Grandparent and Grandchild Role Behaviors, The Gerontologist, 30:1, pp. 43–48, 1990.
10.
SpreyJ. and MatthewsS. H., Contemporary Grandparenthood. A Systemic Transition, Annals of the American Academy of Social Sciences, 464, pp. 91–103, November 1982.
11.
RossiA. S., A Life-Course Approach to Gender, Aging, and Intergenerational Relations, in Social Structure and Aging: Psychological Processes, SchaieK. W. and SchoolerC. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1989.
12.
RossiA. S. and RossiP., Of Human Bonding. Parent-Child Relations across the Life Course, Aldine de Gruyter, New York, 1990.
13.
JohnsonC. L., Grandparenting Options in Divorcing Families: An Anthropological Perspective, in Grandparenthood, BengtsonV. and RobertsonJ. F. (eds.), Sage, Beverly Hills, 1985.
14.
KahanaB. and KahanaE., Grandparenthood from the Perspective of the Developing Grandchild, Developmental Psychology, 3:1, pp. 98–105, 1970.
15.
HartshorneT. S. and ManasterG. J., The Relationship with Grandparents: Contact, Importance, Role Conception, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 15:3, pp. 233–245.
16.
NahemowN. R., Grandparenthood in Transition, in Life-Span Developmental Psychology. Historical and Developmental Effects, McCluskeyK. A. and ReeseH. W. (eds.), Academic Press, New York, 1984.
17.
LangerN., Grandparents and Adult Grandchildren: What Do They Do for One Another?International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 31:2, pp. 101–110, 1990.
18.
LeekM. and SmithP. K., Cooperation and Conflict in Three-Generation Families, in The Psychology of Grandparenthood, SmithP. K. (ed.), Routledge, London, 1991.
19.
HurmeH. E., Child, Mother and Grandmother. Intergenerational Interaction in Finnish Families, Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research, 64, 1988.
20.
HurmeH., Grandchild-Grandparent Relations in Finland and Poland, Rocznik Socjologii Rodziny (Annual of Family Psychology), VI, Poland, pp. 67–99, 1994.
21.
AppleD., The Social Structure of Grandparenthood, American Anthropologist, 58, pp. 656–663, 1956.
22.
McCreadyW., Styles of Grandparenting among White Ethnics, in Grandparenthood, BengtsonV. C. and RobertsonJ. F. (eds.), Sage, Beverly Hills, 1985.
23.
van den HeuvelH.TellegenG., and KoomenW., Cultural Differences in the Use of Psychological and Social Characteristics in Children's Self-Understanding, European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, pp. 353–362, 1992.
24.
RobertsonJ. F., Grandmotherhood: A Study of Role Conceptions, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, pp. 165–174, February 1977.
25.
HoffmanE., Young Adults' Relations with Their Grandparents: An Exploratory Study, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 10:3, pp. 299–309, 1978/79.
26.
MatthewsS. H. and SpreyJ., Adolescent's Relationships with Grandparents: An Empirical Contribution to Conceptual Clarification, Journal of Gerontology, 40:5, pp. 621–626, 1985.
27.
BattistelliP. and FarnetiA., Grandchildren's Images of Their Grandparents; A Psychodynamic Perspective, in The Psychology of Grandparenthood, SmithP. K. (ed.), Routledge, London, 1991.
28.
ClingempelW. G.ColyarJ. J.BrandE., and HetheringtonE. M., Children's Relationships with Maternal Grandparents: A Longitudinal Study of Family Structure and Pubertal Status Effects, Child Development, 63, pp. 1404–1422, 1992.
29.
CollinsworthP.StromR.StromS., and YoungD., The Grandparents Strengths and Needs Inventory: Development and Factorial Validation, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, pp. 785–792, 1991.
30.
NeugartenB. L. and WeinsteinK. K., The Changing American Grandparent, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 26:2, pp. 199–204, 1964.
31.
CohlerB. J. and GrunbaumH. U., Mothers, Grandmothers, and Daughters. Personality and Child-Care in Three-Generation Families, Wiley, New York, 1981.
32.
KivnickM., The Meaning of Grandparenthood, UMI Research Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1982.
33.
BaranowskiM. C., The Grandfather-Grandchild Relationship: Meaning and Exchange, Family Perspectives, 24:3, pp. 201–214, 1990.
34.
FisherL. R., Transition to Grandmotherhood, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 16:1, pp. 67–78, 1983.
35.
AhronsC. R. and BowmanM. E., Changes in Family Relationships following Divorce of Adult Child: Grandmother's Perceptions, Journal of Divorce, 5:1–2, pp. 49–68, 1981.
36.
OysermanD.RadinN., and BennR., Dynamics in a Three-Generational Family: Teens, Grandparents, and Babies, Developmental Psychology, 29:3, pp. 564–572, 1993.
37.
KornhaberA. and WoodwardK., Grandparents/Grandchildren. The Vital Connection, Transaction Books, Oxford, 1985.
38.
HickeyT.HickeyL., and KalishR., Children's Perceptions of the Elderly, Journal of Genetic Psychology, 112, pp. 227–235, 1985.
39.
ThomasE. C. and YamamotoK., Attitudes toward Age: An Exploration in School-Age Children, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 6:2, pp. 17–129, 1975.
40.
SchultzN., A Cognitive-Developmental Study of the Grandchild-Grandparent Bond, Child Study Journal, 10:1, pp. 7–26, 1980.
41.
HurmeH. E., Dimensions of the Grandmother Role, in The Psychology of Grandparenthood, SmithP. K. (ed.), Routledge, London, 1991.
42.
ReykowskiJ. and SmolenskaZ., Collectivism, Individualism, and Interpretation of Social Change: Limitations of a Simplistic Model, Polish Psychological Bulletin, 24:2, pp. 89–107, 1993.
43.
TyszkaZ., Contemporary Polish Families in the Light of Sociological and Multidisciplinary Studies, Rocznik Socjologii Rodziny, tom IV, UAM, Poznan, Poland, 1992.
44.
SimicA., Aging, World View, and Intergenerational Relations in America and Yugoslavia, in The Cultural Context of Aging. Worldwide Perspectives, SokolovskyJ. (ed.), Bergin and Garvey, New York, 1990.
45.
HofstedeG., Culture's Consequences. International Differences in Work-Related Values, Abridged edition, Sage, Beverly Hills, 1984.
46.
HofstedeG., Cultures and Organizations, Harper & Collins, London, 1991.
47.
LivesleyW. and BromleyD. B., Studies in the Developmental Psychology of Person Perception, Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 20, 67, 21A, 1971.
48.
LivesleyW. and BromleyD. B., Person Perception in Childhood and Adolescence, Wiley, New York, 1973.
49.
CaspiA. and ElderG., Emergent Family Patterns: The Intergenerational Construction of Problem Behavior and Relationships, in Relationships within Families. Mutual Influences, HindeR. and Stevenson-HindeJ. (eds.), Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1988.
50.
BronfenbrennerJ., Distancing Theory from a Distance, The Development and Meaning of Psychological Distance, CockingR. T. and RenningerK. A. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1993.
51.
ValsinerJ., Culture and the Development of Children's Action, Wiley, New York, 1987.
52.
SynakB. and TaylorR., The Current State of Social Gerontology in Poland, Ageing and Society, 4:2, pp. 219–228, 1984.
53.
GlinskiP., Economic Aspects of Styles of Life in Polish Urban Families, in Ways of Life in Finland and Poland. Comparative Studies on Urban Populations, RoosJ.-P. and SicinskiA. (eds.), Gower, Aldershot, 1987.
54.
RoosJ.-P. and SicinskiA., Ways and Styles of Life in Finland and Poland: An Introduction, in Ways of Life in Finland and Poland. Comparative Studies on Urban Populations, RoosP. and SicinskiA. (eds.), Gower, Aldershot, 1987.
