Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

An experiment on preference for pure tone pairs varying in intensity and dissonance was conducted in order to test predictions derived from Berlyne's theory of aesthetic preference. According to the theory, preference is an inverted-U function of arousal potential; the determinants of arousal potential are summed, so that an increase in the amount of one determinant leads to a decrease in the maximally preferred level of other determinants; and collative properties, such as dissonance, are the most important predictors of preference. The experiment supported none of these predictions. Preference was related to intensity and dissonance by monotonic or U-shaped functions. The trade-off between intensity and dissonance was not present. Intensity rather than dissonance was the most important determinant of preference. As compared with intensity, the effect of dissonance on preference was negligible. The results are explained in terms of a connectionist theory of aesthetic preference.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berlyne

D. E.

, Arousal and Reinforcement, in Nebraska Symposium on Motivation Levine

(ed.), 15, pp. 1–110, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, 1967.

Berlyne

D. E.

, Aesthetics and Psychobiology, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1971.

Berlyne

D. E.

(ed.), Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics, Hemisphere, Washington, D.C., 1974.

Martindale

Moore

, and Borkum

, Aesthetic Preference: Anomalous Findings for Berlyne's Psychobiological Theory, American Journal of Psychology, 103, pp. 53–80, 1990.

van de Geer

J. P.

Levelt

W. J.

, and Plomp

, The Connotation of Musical Intervals, Acta Psychologia, 20, pp. 308–319, 1962.

Crozier

J. B.

, Verbal and Exploratory Responses to Sound Sequences Varying in Uncertainty Level, in Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics, Berlyne

D. E.

(ed.), pp. 27–90, Hemisphere, Washington, D.C., 1974.

Martindale

and Moore

, Relationship of Musical Preference to Collative, Ecological, and Psychophysical Variables, Music Perception, 6, pp. 431–446, 1989.

Wundt

, Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie, Englemann, Leipzig, 1874.

Vitz

P. C.

, Preference for Tones as a Function of Frequency (Hertz) and Intensity (Decibels), Perception and Psychophysics, 11, pp. 84–88, 1971.

10.

Guilford

J. P.

, System in the Relationship of Affective Value to Frequency and Intensity of Auditory Stimuli, American Journal of Psychology, 67, pp. 691–695, 1954.

11.

Berlyne

D. E.

McDonnell

Nicki

R. M.

, and Parham

L. C. C.

, Effects of Auditory Pitch and Complexity on EEG Desynchronization and on Verbally Expressed Judgments, Canadian Journal of Psychology, 21, pp. 346–367, 1967.

12.

Rosch

, The Nature of Mental Codes for Color Categories, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, pp. 302–322, 1975.

13.

Whitfield

T. W. A.

and Slatter

P. E.

, The Effects of Categorization and Prototypicality on Aesthetic Choice in a Furniture Selection Task, British Journal of Psychology, 70, pp. 65–75, 1979.

14.

Light

L. L.

Hollander

, and Kayra-Stuart

, Why Attractive People are Harder to Remember, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, pp. 269–271, 1981.

15.

Purcell

A. T.

, The Aesthetic Experience and Mundane Reality, in Cognitive Processes in the Perception of Art, Crozier

W. R.

and Chapman

A. J.

, (eds.), pp. 189–210, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984.

16.

Martindale

and Moore

, Priming, Prototypicality, and Preference, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, pp. 661–670, 1988.

17.

Martindale

Moore

, and West

, Relationship of Preference Judgments to Typicality, Novelty, and Mere Exposure, Empirical Studies of the Arts, 6, pp. 79–96, 1988.

18.

Brunswik

, Systematic and Representative Design of Psychological Experiments, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1947.

19.

Apel

, Harvard Dictionary of Music, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1945.

20.

Kameoka

and Kuriyagawa

, Consonance Theory Part I: Consonance of Dyads, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 45, pp. 1451–1459, 1969.

21.

Martindale

, The Pleasures of Thought: A Theory of Cognitive Hedonics, Journal of Mind and Behavior, 5, pp. 49–80, 1984.

22.

Martindale

, Cognition, Psychobiology, and Aesthetics, in The Foundations of Aesthetics, Art, and Art Education, Farley

and Neperud

, (eds.), pp. 7–42, Praeger, New York, 1988.

23.

Martindale

, Cognition and Consciousness, Dorsey, Homewood, IL, 1981.

24.

Martindale

, Cognitive Psychology: A Neural-Network Approach, Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA, 1990.

25.

McClelland

J. L.

and Rumelhart

D. E.

, (eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing, Vol. 2, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1986.

26.

Bharucha

J. J.

, Music Cognition and Perceptual Facilitation: A Connectionist Framework, Music Perception, 5, pp. 1–30, 1987.

27.

Deutsch

, Music Recognition, Psychological Review, 76, pp. 300–307, 1969.

Intensity,Dissonance,and Preference for Pure Tones

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References