In a recent article Erik Olin Wright argues that the U.S. underclass is a drain on the socially available surplus and thus a hindrance to capital accumulation. Wright's argument is not supported by available evidence from the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom on the state's distributive activities. This evidence suggests that the social welfare necessary to sustain the underclass is provided by transfers from wage and salary earners rather than from profit.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WrightE. O.The class analysis of poverty. Int. J. Health Serv. 25(1): 85–100, 1995.
2.
WrightE. O.The class analysis of poverty: A response to Tony Novak. Int. J. Health Serv. 26(2): 371–379, 1996.
3.
GoughI.The Political Economy of the Welfare State. London, Macmillan, 1979.
4.
TonakE.The U.S. welfare state and the working class, 1952–1980. Rev. Radical Polit. Econ.19(1): 47–72, 1987.
5.
ShaikhA.TonakE.The welfare state and the myth of social wage. In The Imperiled Economy: Macroeconomics from a Left Perspective, edited by CherryR.The Union for Radical Political Economics, New York, 1987.
6.
SepehriA.ChernomasR.Who paid for the Canadian welfare state between 1955–1988?Rev. Radical Polit. Econ.24(1): 71–88, 1992.
7.
Akram-LodhiH. A.The public finances of the United Kingdom: A re-interpretation. Int. Rev. Appl. Econ.10(2): 173–193, 1996.
