In 1994, the Chicago Tribune announced in a blaring page-one story that fraud had been discovered in an important nine-year-old medical study which compared two treatments for early-stage breast cancer. The study had assured women that lumpectomy plus radiation was as safe as the more invasive mastectomy procedure for early-stage breast cancer; however, the revelation of fraud called these results into question. We examine the reactions of two professional medical journals to demonstrate how negotiations for upholding ethical norms in science took place within the pages of these publications. Then, we analyze the public discourse surrounding the fraud and show that much of the coverage was devoted to scandal. Both forums missed opportunities: professional journals ignored a chance to explore the blurry boundary between “writing up” and “making up” results that all scientists must negotiate in interpreting and publicizing data, while public discourse neglected women affected by the fraud.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Fraud in Breast Cancer Study: Doctor Lied on Data for Decade, Chicago Tribune, pp. 1 and 16, March 13, 1994.
2.
KosaryC. L.RiesL. A. G.MillerB. A. (eds.), SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1992, Tables and Graphs, National Cancer Institute, NIH Publication 96–2789, Bethesda, Maryland, 1995.
3.
KuhnT., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 35 and 23–24, 1970.
4.
FahnestockJ., Accommodating Science: The Rhetorical Life of Scientific Facts, Written Communication, 3, pp. 275–296, 1986.
5.
ReevesC., Language, Rhetoric, and AIDS: The Attitudes and Strategies of Key AIDS Medical Scientists and Physicians, Written Communication, 13, pp. 130–157, 1996.
6.
ThackerB. and StratmanJ. F., Transmuting Common Substances: The Cold Fusion Controversy and the Rhetoric of Science, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 9, pp. 389–424, 1995.
7.
HerndlC. G.FennellB. A., and MillerC. R., Understanding Failures in Organizational Discourse: The Accident at Three Mile Island and the Shuttle Challenger Disaster, in Textual Dynamics of the Professions: Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities, BazermanC. and ParadisJ. (eds.), University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp. 279–305, 1991.
8.
FisherB.BauerM.MargoleseR., Five-Year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy and Segmental Mastectomy with or without Radiation in the Treatment of Breast Cancer, New England Journal of Medicine, 312, pp. 665–673, 1985.
9.
FisherB.RedmondC.PoissonR., Eight-Year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy and Lumpectomy With or Without Irradiation in the Treatment of Breast Cancer, New England Journal of Medicine, 320, pp. 822–828, 1989.
10.
AngellM. and KassirerJ., Setting the Record Straight in Breast Cancer Trials, New England Journal of Medicine, 330, pp. 1448–1449, 1994.
11.
HuetP.-M., Correspondence, New England Journal of Medicine, 330, p. 1462, 1994.
12.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 86:7, p. 527, 1994.
13.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 86:9, p. 722, 1994.
14.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 87:1, p. 4, 1995.
15.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 87:7, p. 540, 1995.
16.
PoissonR., Correspondence, New England Journal of Medicine, 330, p. 1460, 1994.
17.
HalloranS. M., Technical Writing and the Rhetoric of Science, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 8:2, pp. 77–88, 1978.
18.
NCITakes Steps to Strengthen Clinical Trials Management, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 86:9, p. 667, 1994.
19.
BroderS., Correspondence, New England Journal of Medicine, 330, pp. 1460–1461, 1994.
20.
BazermanC., Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1988.
21.
BlakesleeA., Acquiring Disciplinary Identity: Connections between Learning and Social Context, 4S Conference, West Lafayette, Indiana, November 1993.
22.
GrossA. G., The Rhetoric of Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1990.
23.
MyersG., Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1990.
24.
AronowitzS., Science as Power: Discourse and Ideology in Modern Society, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, p. 262, 1988.
25.
MillerC. R., Special Review Essay: Some Perspectives on Rhetoric, Science, and History, Rhetorica, 7, pp. 101–114, 1989.
26.
FoucaultM., The Foucault Reader, RabinowP. (ed.), Pantheon, New York, p. 109, 1984.
27.
LincolnY. S. and GubaE. G., Naturalistic Inquiry, Sage, Newbury Park, California, p. 37, 1985.
28.
PolanyiM., Science, Faith, and Society, Phoenix, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 15 and 54, 1996.
29.
PopperK., In Search of a Better World: Lectures and Essays from Thirty Years, BennettL. J. (trans.), Routledge, London, United Kingdom, p. 74, 1992.
30.
D. M. Stablein and Staff of The Emmes Corporation, B-06: The Final Report, Bethesda, Maryland, CancerNet from the National Cancer Institute, identification number cn-400028, April 1994, modified November 1995.
31.
DobrinD., What's Technical About Technical Writing? in New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication: Research, Theory, Practice, AndersonP. V.BrockmanR. J., and MillerC. R. (eds.), Baywood, Amityville, New York, p. 242, 1983.
32.
Safety of Lumpectomy Confirmed, Chicago Tribune, p. 4, April 20, 1994.
33.
Flawed Cancer Study Haunts Many Women, New York Times, pp. B6–B9, March 16, 1994.
34.
How Safe is Lumpectomy, Newsweek, p. 57, March 28, 1994.
35.
Breast Cancer: A Diagnosis of Deceit, Time, pp. 52–53, March 28, 1994.
36.
NelkinD., The Press on the Technological Frontier, in Science and Technology Today, MacKenzieN. R. (ed.), St. Martin's Press, New York, pp. 222–231, 1997.
37.
HardingS., Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 5 and 75, 1991.
38.
ParkerL. S., Breast Cancer Screening and Critical Bioethics' Gaze, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 3, pp. 313–337, 1995.
39.
TilghmanS. M., Science Versus the Female Scientist, in Science and Technology Today, MacKenzieN. R. (ed.), St. Martin's Press, New York, pp. 51–54, 1997.
40.
Data on Risks Create Debate about Drugs to Prevent Breast Cancer, New York Times, pp. B6–B9, March 16, 1994.
41.
DuffieldJ., Correspondence, Chronicle of Higher Education, 43:45, p. B-11, July 16, 1997.
42.
LopezE. S. and NagelhoutE., Building a Model for Distance Collaboration in the Computer-Assisted Business Communication Classroom, Business Communication Quarterly, 58, pp. 15–20, 1995.
