As diverse student populations expand in colleges and universities in the United States, attention must be given to preserving students' cultural integrity. Dominant theories of student persistence contend that integration, not cultural preservation is necessary to student success. This qualitative study examines the experiences of one group of diverse students who had low retention and graduation rates. International students in their senior year at a private, religiously-affiliated university were interviewed to determine if they had integrated into the mainstream campus culture to be successful. Three areas of change were identified: those that most students make when transitioning to college, those required by the religious environment of the institution, and those related to students' home cultures. The study demonstrates that one group of diverse students, international students, saw integration as positive. They did not view their integration as assimilation and felt that they had preserved their cultural integrity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArthurN. (2003). Preparing international students for the re-entry transition. Canadian Journal of Counseling, 37(3), 173–185.
2.
AstinA. (1975). Preventing students from dropping out. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
AstinA. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297–308.
4.
AstinA. (1993). What matters in college: Four critical years. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
AstinA. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518–537.
6.
AttinasiL. C. (1992). Rethinking the study of the outcomes of college attendance. Journal of College Student Development, 33(1), 61–70.
7.
BeanJ. P., & EatonS. B. (2002). The psychology underlying successful retention practices. Journal of College Student Development, 3(1), 73–89.
8.
BeanJ. P., & MetzerB. S. (1985). A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition. Review of Educational Research, 55, 485–540.
9.
BergerJ. B., & MilemJ. F. (1999). The role of student involvement and perceptions of integration in a causal model of student persistence. Research in Higher Education, 40(6), 641–664.
10.
BowenW. G.BokD, & BurkhartG. (1999). A report card on diversity: Lessons for business from higher education. Harvard Business Review, 77(1), 38–49.
11.
CarnevaleA. P., & FryR. A. (2000). Crossing the great divide: Can we achieve equity when Generation Y goes to college? (Leadership 2000 Series, No. 107). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
12.
ChinH. K. K. (2002). Open doors: Report on international educational exchange. New York: Institute of International Education.
13.
CoreilC., & HaberS. (2000). ESL students and native speakers: A comparative study of academic performance. The Academic Forum, 9(1), 8–12.
14.
CreswellJ. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
DeyE., & HurtadoS. (1994). College students in changing contexts. In AltbachP. G.BendahlR. O., & GumportP. J. (Eds.), Higher education in American society (3rd ed.). New York: Prometheus Books.
16.
DurkheimE. (1951). Suicide (SpauldingJ. A. & SimpsonG., Trans.). Glencoe: The Free Press.
17.
ElkinsS.BraxtonJ. M., & JamesG. W. (2000). Tinto's separation and its influence on first-semester college student persistence. Research in Higher Education, 41(2), 251–268.
18.
EvansN. (2001). “In their own words: Polynesian students' perspectives on persistence in an American university.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.
19.
GeertzC. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In GeertzC. (Ed.), The interpretation of culture: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). New York: Basic Books.
20.
GlesneC. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
21.
Hechanova-AlampayR.BeehrT. A.ChristiansenN. D., & van HornR. K. (2002). Adjustment and strain among domestic and international student sojourners: A longitudinal study. School Psychology International, 23(4), 458–474.
22.
HornL. J., & CarrollC. D. (1997). Confronting the odds: Students at risk and the pipeline to higher education (NELS:88/94). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
23.
HurtadoS., & CarterD. F. (1997). Effects of college transition and perceptions of the campus racial climate on Latino college students' sense of belonging. Sociology of Education, 70(October), 324–345.
24.
KruegerR. A., & CaseyM. (2000). Focus groups (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
KvaleS. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
LacinaJ. G. (2002). Preparing international students for a successful social experience in higher education. New Directions for Higher Education, 117, 21–27.
27.
LaddP. D., & RubyR.Jr. (1999). Learning style and adjustment issues of international students. Journal of Education for Business, 74(6), 363–367.
28.
LeeD. S. (1997). What teachers can do to relieve problems identified by international students. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 70, 93–100.
29.
LevineA., & CuretonJ. (1998). Generation without a name. In When hope and fear collide: A portrait of today's student (pp. 1–17). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
30.
LinJ. G., & YiJ. K. (1997). Asian international students' adjustment: Issues and program suggestions. College Student Journal, 31(4), 473–479.
31.
LincolnY. S., & GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
32.
LincolnY. S., & GubaE. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 163–188). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
McNultyM. (1995). Campus leadership and American pluralism. Liberal Education, 81(1), 44–47.
35.
MonteroJ. (1995). Safe spaces or separation? Mediating the tension. Educational Record, 76(2–3), 37–40.
36.
MoreyA. I. (2000). Changing higher education curricula for a global and multicultural world. Higher Education in Europe, 25(1), 25–39.
37.
MoriS. (2000). Addressing the mental health concerns of international students. Journal of Counseling & Development, 78(2), 137–144.
38.
MurpheyC.HawkesL., & LawJ. (2002). How international students can benefit from a web-based college orientation. New Directions for Higher Education, 117, 37–43.
39.
National Collegiate Athletic Association. (2003, August 1). 2003 NCAA graduation-rates report. Retrieved March 18, 2004 from http://www.ncaa.org/grad_rates/2003/.
40.
NoraA. (2002). The depiction of significant others in Tinto's “Rites of Passage”: A reconceptualization of the influence of family and community in the persistence process. Journal of College Student Retention, 31(1), 41–56.
41.
NoraA., & CabreraA. F. (1996). The role of perceptions of prejudice and discrimination on the adjustment of minority students to college. Journal of Higher Education, 37(4), 427–452.
42.
ParrG.BradleyL., & BingiR. (1992). Concerns and feelings of international students. Journal of College Student Development, 33(1), 20–25.
43.
PattonM. Q. (1982). Practical evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44.
RajapaksaS., & DundesL. (2003). It's a long way home: International student adjustment to living in the United States. Journal of College Student Retention, 4(10), 15–28.
45.
ReyesN. (1997). Holding on to what they've got: A look at programs designed to keep college students in college. Black Issues in Higher Education, 13(26), 36–41.
46.
RobertsonM.LineM.JonesS., & ThomasS. (2000). International students, learning environments and perceptions: A case study using the Delphi technique. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(1), 89–101.
47.
Sarkodie-MensahK. (1998). International students in the U.S.: Trends, cultural adjustments, and solutions for a better experience. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 39(3), 214–222.
48.
SpadyW. G. (1971). Dropouts from higher education: Toward an empirical model. Interchange, 2, 38–62.
49.
StageF. K., & RushkinP. W. (1993). A combined model of student predisposition to college and persistence in college. Journal of College Student Development, 34, 276–281.
50.
StoynoffS. (1997). Factors associated with international students' academic achievement. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 24(1), 56–68.
51.
TatumB. D.CalhounW. R.BrownS. C., & AyvazianA. (2000). Implementation strategies for creating an environment of achievement. Liberal Education, 86(2), 18–25.
52.
TeschR. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York: Falmer.
53.
TierneyW. G. (1991). Utilizing ethnographic interview to enhance academic decision making. New Directions for Institutional Research, 72, 7–22.
54.
TierneyW. G. (1992). An anthropological analysis of student participation in college. Journal of Higher Education, 63(6), 603–618.
55.
TingS. M. R. (1998). Predicting first-year grades and academic progress of college students of first-generation and low-income families. Journal of College Admission, 158(Winter), 14–23.
56.
TintoV. (1975). Dropouts from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.
57.
TintoV. (1986). Theories of student departure revisited. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. II, pp. 359–384). New York: Agathon Press.
58.
TintoV. (1987, 1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59.
Van GennepA. (1960). The rites of passage (VizedonM. & CaffeeG., Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60.
WanG. (2001). The learning experience of Chinese students in American universities: A cross-cultural perspective. College Student Journal, 35(1), 28–44.
