Abstract
The passage of the National Health Planning and Resources Development Act in the United States in 1974 is used to set the context for a new assessment of health planning as a change agent. In reviewing the record of health planning the most striking conclusion is that even its friends have been unable to establish that it has had any quantifiable impact. The authors suggest, however, that comprehensive health planning may have stimulated the belief that changes in medical care organization are crucial to improving the health care system.
The authors next consider the role of health planning inferred from three widely espoused “models” of the health care system: professional, central planning, and market. Although market advocates generally deemphasize health planning as contrasted to those supporting a centrally planned system, none of the models is sufficiently developed to indicate specific roles and functions for health planning.
Basing their argument on goals for health care reform generally espoused by students of medical care organization, the authors assert that health planning agencies will be most effective if they are organizationally linked to general-purpose governments, encourage the formation of Health Maintenance Organizations, consciously involve themselves in health system reorganization, and design their policies so they can be effectively evaluated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.